Manulife Financial Corp.  (TSX:MFC)(NYSE:MFC) has a reputation as a stable, blue-chip Canadian financial corporation, but as shareholders during the recession of 2008 know, this can be dangerous assumption.

Due to Manulife’s excessive exposure to equity markets through its large segregated funds business, Manulife realized a $3.7 billion charge on net income due to equity market losses, resulting in a net income of $517 million, down from $4.3 million in 2007. Shares declined 65% alongside earnings, and Manulife was required to obtain a $3 billion bank loan to shore up its reserves and maintain capital requirements.

Although Manulife has made huge improvements with regards to risk management, the company still has a fairly large exposure to equity markets. Is it still a risky play?

Why Manulife was at risk                            

Manulife’s risk can be traced back to its very large variable annuity business. Variable annuities are often described as “mutual funds with an insurance wrapper,” and this is due to the fact that these products allow policy holders to benefit from the upside of an equity investment, while retaining certain guarantees.

For example, a policyholder may contribute premiums to a variable annuity 10 years, and after the period is up, they receive a guaranteed minimum income for life based on the highest value of the account during the 10-year accumulation period.

The insurance company is required to pay out these guarantees, regardless of the underlying value of the fund which the premiums were invested in. These funds are also invested in fixed-income instruments, exposing them to interest rate risk, and as a result, when equity markets and interest rates drop (as they did in 2008), the value of Manulife’s guarantees exceed its account values.

In 2008 Manulife’s total funds for variable annuities were $76 billion, which was $26 billion less than the guarantees it had made, and this difference is attributed to falling equity markets and falling interest rates (which increased the value of Manulife’s liabilities relative to its assets).

Although these products were hugely profitable for Manulife leading up to the 2008 crash, the long-term guaranteed nature of these products, and the fact that Manulife had largely opted not to hedge its risk, made the company highly exposed to an equity market decline.

Manulife has reduced its risk

Fortunately, Manulife has made several moves to reduce its overall exposure to interest rates and equity markets. In 2009 the company began a hedging program, which offsets losses from downward movements in equity markets, and Manulife currently hedges all new variable annuity policies and is progressing towards a goal of ensuring two thirds of its variable annuity business is hedged.

These hedges are costly and reduce upside, meaning that Manulife will not benefit as much from rising equity markets or interest rates. This is a worthwhile trade-off for investors, since it prevents them from the type of catastrophic losses observed in 2008.

In addition, Manulife is also working to match the duration of its assets with its liabilities, which reduces the impact of low interest rates. Insurers’ liabilities are often long-term in nature, and when assets like bonds do not match the duration of the liabilities, it is possible that short-term bonds can mature, and the insurance company may need to purchase new bonds at a lower interest rate.

As a result of these activities, Manulife has reduced its interest rate and equity market risk. In 2014 a 10% decline in equity markets reduced Manulife’s earnings by $480 million, or about 13% of net income, compared with a $1.3 billion reduction in net income in 2011, which represented over 100% of net income.

Manulife has made significant progress in reducing its risk, and although it is still one of the riskier insurance plays in Canada, its strong growth profile makes it a worthwhile buy.

While insurance companies are one way to play the Canadian financial sector, it's important not to forget Canadian banks.

Canadian banks are considered must-have investments. After all, they're very stable, well-capitalized, and face limited competition. That said, there are concerns for the banks and their investors. In this FREE report, we cover everything you need to know about Canada's big five--whether you're already an investor or are considering buying shares. Simply click here to receive your special FREE report, "What Every Bank Shareholder MUST Know."


Let’s not beat around the bush – energy companies performed miserably in 2015. Yet, even though the carnage was widespread, not all energy-related businesses were equally affected.

We've identified an energy company we think offers one of the best growth opportunities around. While this company is largely tied to the production of natural gas, it doesn't actually produce the gas. Instead, it provides the equipment required to get natural gas from the ground to the end user. With diversified operations around the globe, we think it's a rare find in the industry.

We like it so much, we’ve named it as 1 Top Stock for 2016 and Beyond. To find out why, simply enter your email address below to claim your FREE copy of this brand new report, "1 Top Stock for 2016 and Beyond"!

Fool contributor Adam Mancini has no position in any stocks mentioned.