Is TransCanada Corporation Really Worth $55 a Share?

According to analysts, TransCanada Corporation (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) is becoming less cyclical and therefore much more valuable.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

After hitting road blocks to organic growth in nearly every direction, TransCanada Corporation (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) has taken a different route this time by buying growth instead.

It’s a route that analysts at Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C) applauded because not only does it solve the company’s growth problem, but it will make the company’s overall earnings less cyclical because of the assets it plans to shed to pay for its acquisition. Add these changes up, and Citigroup’s analysts believe the stock is now worth $55 a share, well above its current trading price.

A portfolio overhaul

TransCanada’s $13 billion acquisition of U.S. pipeline company Columbia Pipeline Group Inc. (NYSE:CPGX) is a game changer for the company according to Citigroup because it will finally lead to the unloading of TransCanada’s power assets. These are assets that Citigroup has advocated be split apart from TransCanada since 2014 in order for investors to have complete exposure to the company’s pipeline assets.

The reason TransCanada is now planning to sell its power assets is because it offered to pay all cash for Colombia Pipeline Group as opposed to using stock to fund some or all of the deal. However, instead of borrowing vast sums of cash to pay for the deal, TransCanada chose to undertake a record $4.42 billion equity offering and sell its U.S. power assets and its Mexican pipeline joint venture.

According to Citigroup, TransCanada should be able to fetch $4 billion for the power assets and another $2 billion for its 49% stake in the Mexican natural gas pipelines, which should more than cover the cost of the deal once we include the assumption of debt.

A foundation for growth

In basically trading those two businesses for Columbia Pipeline Group, TransCanada will be shedding low growth cyclical assets for Columbia Pipeline Group’s high-growth opportunities. That’s because the company has US$7.3 billion in projects under construction that are expected to drive significant earnings growth between 2018 and 2020. In fact, Citigroup sees these projects boosting Columbia Pipeline’s EBITDA by 70%.

Given those projections, Citigroup sees TransCanada currently trading at a very attractive 15 times 2018 earnings, which is one of the lower multiples among large-cap pipeline and utility companies. It’s this low-end multiple combined with the fact that TransCanada is expected to deliver robust 10% annual earnings and dividend growth through 2022 that’s driving its $55 a share price target.

That upside to its current trading price also convinced Citigroup to upgrade TransCanada to a buy from its prior hold rating.

Investor takeaway

Citigroup loves TransCanada’s decisions to buy the fast-growing Columbia Pipeline Group and jettison its cyclical U.S. power assets. That’s because the deal provides a lot more certainty to long-term growth, which had been weighing the stock down. With that uncertainly and cyclicality removed, Citigroup sees a cheap stock that’s a pretty compelling long-term buy in its book.

All that being said, TransCanada still has to not only close the Colombia Pipeline Group deal, but also sell both its power assets and its Mexican pipeline joint venture at or above the values that analysts have placed on those assets. Not to mention that the growth projects need to deliver as promised.

If TransCanada misses on one or more of these initiatives, then it is quite possible that Citigroup’s estimates could prove to be too optimistic. It’s a real risk given that TransCanada has had execution issues in the past, which is why it had to buy growth instead of build it. So, don’t go banking on a quick profit, because that $55 upside is no sure bet.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

Beat the TSX With This Cash-Gushing Dividend Stock

Canadian Natural Resources stock is well set up to beat the TSX as it continues to generate strong cash flows…

Read more »

energy industry
Energy Stocks

2 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist Now

These two rallying TSX energy stocks can continue delivering robust returns to investors in the long term.

Read more »

green energy
Energy Stocks

1 Magnificent TSX Dividend Stock Down 37% to Buy and Hold Forever

This dividend stock has fallen significantly from poor results, but zoom in and there are some major improvements happening.

Read more »

oil tank at night
Energy Stocks

3 Energy Stocks Already Worth Your While

Here's why blue-chip TSX energy stocks such as Enbridge should be part of your equity portfolio in 2024.

Read more »

Solar panels and windmills
Energy Stocks

1 Beaten-Down Stock That Could Be the Best Bet in the TSX

This renewable energy stock could be one of the best buys you make this year, as the company starts to…

Read more »

Dice engraved with the words buy and sell
Energy Stocks

Is Enbridge Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?

Here's why Enbridge (TSX:ENB) remains a top dividend stock long-term investors may want to consider, despite current risks.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

If You Had Invested $5,000 in Enbridge Stock in 2018, This Is How Much You Would Have Today

Enbridge's high dividend yield hasn't made up for its dismal total returns.

Read more »

Bad apple with good apples
Energy Stocks

Avoid at All Costs: This Stock Is Portfolio Poison

A mid-cap stock commits to return more to shareholders, but some investors remember the suspension of dividends a few years…

Read more »