Which 2 Canadian Blue-Chip Companies Offer +15% Compounded Returns?

As a result of a short-sighted approach, the market appears to have soured on Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (TSX:POT)(NYSE:POT) and Cameco Corp. (TSX:CCO)(NYSE:CCJ). Looking to the future, do these two companies still offer the same promise they once did?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Five years ago, if you’d asked a room full of financial experts what would be the one stock they would recommend to clients for a long-term buy-and-hold investment, chances are that Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (TSX:POT)(NYSE:POT) and Cameco Corp. (TSX:CCO)(NYSE:CCJ) would have come up more than a couple of times and may even have been the consensus picks among the group.

Potash and Cameco have long been heralded as blue-chip investments by the investment community at least partially owing to the outlook for the industries they operate in. Potash, a manufacturer of fertilizers, is positioned to benefit from a growing population in combination with a finite and diminishing supply of arable land. Cameco is pointed to as a viable source of clean energy by way of its uranium deposits used to power nuclear power facilities.

Beyond a favourable industry outlook, both Potash and Cameco are as seen as blue chips because within their industries, they own world-class assets. Potash’s Saskatchewan mines and Cameco’s MacArthur River and Cigar Lake uranium deposits are estimated to have several decades of useful life remaining; further to this, they are among the most cost-efficient operations in their respective markets.

However, a combination of low commodity prices and other external market factors have raised all of this into question of late. Commodity behemoths such as BHP Billiton Limited and Vale SA are planning big moves into the potash market, and Cameco is still reeling from the after-effects of the Japanese Fukushima disaster.

Potash’s sales have fallen $3.6 billion, or 45%, since 2012, and net profits are 84% lower as a result. Cameco, meanwhile, has seen sales decline in three of the last five years and ended 2016 with a $62 million net loss.

Potash has been forced to cut its dividend on two separate occasions over the past 18 months. While Cameco has not cut its dividend, it also has not increased the distribution since 2011 and now has a payout ratio in negative territory.

To be truthful, most of the aforementioned factors are completely out of management’s control and are part of the inherent risk of investing in commodity-related stocks. Management of both companies have done their best to weather the storm by cutting costs where appropriate and scaling back on investments and capital expenditures.

Owing to this, both companies have still been able to generate positive free cash flow (FCF), despite a challenging market environment. Potash is expected to produce $1.22 of FCF per share on earnings of $0.84 in 2017. Meanwhile, on earnings of $0.35 per share, Cameco is expected to yield FCF of $1.27 per share.

Which should you buy?

The outlook for both companies is, for the most part, the same. Short-term risks lay ahead for both, although the long-term stories, which many investors appear to have forgotten, remain intact. Both companies should expect to benefit from ongoing production increases, modest commodity price appreciation, and demographic factors.

Based on current estimates, Cameco appears to offer the better prospective returns for investors. At today’s price of $13, and assuming the company can sustain a pace of 10% earnings growth over the long term, investors should expect to earn a tidy 20% annual compounded return on their investment.

Potash, while not offering quite the same level of returns, is also not a bad investment by most standards. Assuming the same 10% growth rate, Potash would be expected to return 16% compounded annually over a long-term investment horizon.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Jason Phillips has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

financial freedom sign
Dividend Stocks

RRSP Secrets: 3 Millionaire Strategies Revealed

The RRSP helps Canadians save for retirement and proper utilization can make you a millionaire over time or when you…

Read more »

dividends grow over time
Dividend Stocks

3 Fabulous Dividend Stocks to Buy in April

If you're looking to boost your passive income while interest rates are elevated, here are three of the best dividend…

Read more »

calculate and analyze stock
Dividend Stocks

2 Top TSX Dividend Stocks That Still Look Oversold

These top TSX dividend-growth stocks now offer very high yields.

Read more »

Dollar symbol and Canadian flag on keyboard
Dividend Stocks

Beginner Investors: 5 Top Canadian Stocks for 2024

New to the stock market? Here are five Canadian companies to build a portfolio around.

Read more »

Increasing yield
Dividend Stocks

Want to Gain $1,000 in Annual Dividend Income? Invest $16,675 in These 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks

Are you looking for cash right now? These are likely your best options to make over $1,000 in annual dividend…

Read more »

TELECOM TOWERS
Dividend Stocks

Passive-Income Investors: The Best Telecom Bargain to Buy in May

BCE (TSX:BCE) stock may be entering deep-value mode, as the multi-year selloff continues through 2024.

Read more »

edit Safe pig, protect money
Dividend Stocks

3 Safe Dividend Stocks to Own for the Next 10 Years

These Canadian dividend gems could help you earn worry-free passive income over the next decade.

Read more »

A plant grows from coins.
Dividend Stocks

Dividend Stocks: What’s Better? Growth or Consistency?

Are you trying to invest in dividend stocks? What’s better, growth or consistency? Here’s my take.

Read more »