Head to Head: BCE Inc. vs. Telus Corporation

Between BCE Inc (TSX:BCE)(NYSE:BCE) and Telus Corporation (TSX:T)(NYSE:TU), who is leading so far this year?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

BCE Inc. (TSX: BCE)(NYSE: BCE) and Telus Corporation (TSX: T)(NYSE: TU) both announced solid third-quarter results, again highlighting their growth potential and attraction as a reliable investments for income seeking investors.

Let’s compare the results of the two companies so far this year in order to determine which one is better positioned to reward investors in future.

Telus leads on operational performance

The main trends were similar for both companies – wireless, high speed internet connections, and television connections increased while landline connections continued to decline. Although BCE has the higher number of total connections, Telus managed to increase connections at a faster pace in the growth categories of wireless, high speed internet, and television and experienced fewer losses in the landline category.

In the highly profitable wireless mobile category, Telus again managed to extract considerably higher average revenue per user of $62.73 compared to $59.71 for BCE, had a lower cost per user acquired and experienced a lower customer turnover rate. On the other hand, BCE managed to increase the average revenue per user by almost 5% in the first nine months of the year, demonstrating the additional growth potential should it be able to reach the levels achieved by Telus.

A draw on financial performance

Revenue and EBITDA growth at Telus was a little better than for BCE while BCE retained its leadership in terms of EBITDA profit margin at 40.5% versus 36.8% at Telus. As a result of an active share repurchase program, Telus managed to increase its earnings per share in the first nine months by 15.4% compared to 7.4% at BCE.

BCE stronger on cash flow generation

Both companies continued to generate considerable amounts of cash with operating cash flow generation at BCE 1.6% higher so far in 2014 and with a cash conversion ratio (sales converted into cash) of 30.4%. Telus lagged on both counts with a slight decline in operating cash flow generation and a lower conversion ratio.

Free cash flow (that is operating cash flow minus capital expenditure) at both companies remained robust covering the dividend payments. However, both companies also incurred substantial capital outlays outside of the normal maintenance capital expenditures.

BCE spent $3.95 billion on the acquisition of the minority owned shares in Bell Aliant, partly financed with BCE shares and partly with $1 billion of cash. In addition BCE spent $566 million on the acquisition of 700 MHz wireless spectrum assets resulting in an increase in net debt to $21 billion (4%) since the start of the year. The debt-to-capital ratio at 58% is relatively high but should decline over time as a result of the increased cash flow from the Bell Aliant acquisition.

Telus also spent $1.1 billion on the acquisition of spectrum assets earlier this year and completed the acquisition of 2.1% of the outstanding shares valued at $500 million resulting in an increase of the net debt to $9.3 billion. The debt-to-capital ratio is now fairly high at 53% compared to 50% last year.

In conclusion, both companies are performing well with no clear leader so far this year. Both also seem to be investing prudently to further enhance growth prospects and investor returns.

The main attraction is in the dividend

The main attraction for many investors in these companies is the consistent and growing dividend payments as well as the attractive yields currently available. Telus increased its dividend payment this year by 12% and by 58% over the past five years while BCE has increased its dividend by 6% this year and has grown the dividend by 56% over the past five years. BCE currently has the higher yield at 4.7% while Telus has a dividend yield of 3.5%.

Both companies are excellent investment candidates for income investors with the potential for further single-digit annual growth in the dividend over the medium term.

Fool contributor Deon Vernooy, CFA holds shares in BCE and Telus.

More on Dividend Stocks

Muscles Drawn On Black board
Dividend Stocks

Canadian Defensive Stocks to Buy Now for Stability

Looking for a mix of stability, growth, and income? These two quality Canadian stocks are top defensive stocks to own.

Read more »

The sun sets behind a power source
Dividend Stocks

The Utilities Play: Boring, Reliable, and Suddenly Profitable

Quality utilities like Fortis stock is good for accumulation, especially on market corrections, for long-term, reliable wealth creation.

Read more »

TFSA (Tax free savings account) acronym on wooden cubes on the background of stacks of coins
Dividend Stocks

The Canadian Dividend Stocks I’d Be Most Comfortable Holding in a TFSA Forever

These three Canadian dividend stocks could be ideal long-term TFSA holdings.

Read more »

Woman in private jet airplane
Dividend Stocks

A Dependable Monthly Dividend Stock With a 6.6% Yield

This monthly dividend stock offers steady income backed by a diversified business model.

Read more »

money goes up and down in balance
Dividend Stocks

4 TSX Stocks Worth Considering as the Market Shifts Back Toward Value

Value investing is making a comeback in 2026 – and these TSX stocks fit the trend.

Read more »

woman checks off all the boxes
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks That Could Deserve a Spot in Nearly Any Portfolio

Are you wondering how to build a portfolio that generates stable, growing passive income? These five top dividend stocks should…

Read more »

workers walk through an office building
Dividend Stocks

3 Undervalued TSX Stocks to Buy Before the Crowd Catches On

These three “undervalued” TSX names all look imperfect today, which is exactly why their valuations may be offering opportunity.

Read more »

bank of canada governor tiff macklem
Dividend Stocks

3 Canadian Stocks I’d Buy Before the Next Bank of Canada Move

With the Bank of Canada on hold, these three TSX names offer earnings power that doesn’t require perfect rate cuts.

Read more »