Here’s What’s Wrong With Barrick Gold

Make sure management’s incentives are aligned with investors or pay the price.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) represents everything that went wrong in the gold mining industry.

The past several years have been marked by a long list of expensive mistakes. The company purchased asset after asset at ridiculously high prices that blew up when commodity prices imploded. Its attempt to diversify outside of its precious-metals business into copper mining resulted in nearly $4 billion in write-offs. And development at the company’s flagship Pascua Lama was billions of dollars overbudget before being shut down.

Shareholders have paid dearly for these missteps. Today, the company is saddled with over $13 billion in debt and the stock trades at a discount to peers on most valuation metrics. But if I had one chart to sum up everything that’s wrong with Barrick, it would be this one.

Screenshot 2014-03-30 at 8.43.34 PM.png

Source: Two Fish Asset Management

Since 2003, Barrick has spent over $40 billion on capital expenditures and acquisitions. Shareholders have actually paid an additional $4 billion into the business. And in exchange for this, gold production per share actually declined 30% between 2003 and 2012.

Sure, on many metrics — such as revenue, EBITDA, and employees — Barrick is a larger company. But through the lens of the investor, all of this expansion has done nothing to grow shareholder wealth. In essence, shareholders have sacrificed billions of dollars in potential dividends and share buybacks in order to finance management’s empire ambitions.

How did this happen? The board tied its compensation structure primarily to growth benchmarks — namely adjusted free cash flow and adjusted EBITDA — without taking into account the capital required to grow those metrics.

The board has a misguided view that growing production, cash flow, and reserves is what drives investment returns. They have placed no emphasis on any per share measures of these criteria. Building a compensation scheme around EBITDA and free cash flow measures without accounting for shares outstanding or capital employed is flawed.

How can this be fixed? Fortunately the company is starting to address this issue. At Barrick’s annual general meeting later this month, the board plans to announce a new executive compensation plan in order to better align the interests of management with shareholders.

What metrics should be used to grade management? Once again, everything must be considered from the perspective of shareholders. The board should not use operating cash flow, but operating cash flow per share. The board should not use not gold production, but gold production per share. The board should not use not reserve replacement, but reserve replacement per share.

In addition, management should also be forced to hold more stock. According to Barrick’s 2013 proxy circular, the company’s board of directors owns only 0.3% of outstanding shares combined. No wonder management presided over this massive destruction of shareholder value; it wasn’t their money on the line. By forcing management to hold a larger stake in the company, they’re incentivized to think like business owners rather than high-paid managers.

Foolish bottom line

Does management play alongside shareholders? Is their motivation to win big if the company succeeds? Or is it their own paycheck? Barrick shareholders have learned a valuable lesson: Make sure the incentives of management of investors or pay the price.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Robert Baillieul has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article.

More on Investing

grow dividends
Dividend Stocks

2 Unloved TSX Dividend Stocks That Could Soar in 2024

These top TSX dividend stocks look cheap right now.

Read more »

TFSA and coins
Dividend Stocks

3 TFSA Stocks I’m Eyeing for My 2024 Contribution

In 2024, I'll be adding dividend stocks like Brookfield to my account.

Read more »

Dice engraved with the words buy and sell
Bank Stocks

TD Bank Stock: Buy, Sell, or Hold?

TD Bank has been hit with negative earnings momentum and rising provision for credit losses, making TD Bank stock a…

Read more »

TFSA and coins
Dividend Stocks

Canada Revenue Agency: 1 Crucial TFSA Change You Need to Be Aware Of

The TFSA contribution limit is out for 2024 and has increased to $7,000, raising the cumulative contribution room to $95,000.

Read more »

money cash dividends

Sitting on Cash? These 3 TSX Stocks Are Great Buys

Got some cash left over from the Black Friday sales? Here are three TSX stocks that could have long-term upside!

Read more »

tsx today
Tech Stocks

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Tuesday, November 28

Canadian bank earnings and the U.S. consumer confidence data could give further direction to TSX stocks today.

Read more »

money cash dividends
Dividend Stocks

3 Passive-Income Streams That Will Take You to the Next Level

These passive-income streams do not take a second more of your time. Focus on your day job and look forward…

Read more »

A worker uses the cloud for paperless work. tech
Tech Stocks

Alibaba Just Became a Dividend Stock… Could This TSX Stock be Next?

Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) recently became a dividend stock. Could Kinaxis Inc (TSX:KXS) be next?

Read more »