3 Reasons Why a Barrick-Newmont Merger Makes Sense

The deal is off for now, but may soon be back on. Why should Barrick’s shareholders be hopeful?

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn more

Study after study has shown that large acquisitions tend to destroy shareholder value. They are often the result of a company just wanting to bet bigger (“empire building”), which can lead to overpaying for sought-after targets. And over the last few years, there’s been no better poster-child than Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX). The company’s $7.7 billion takeover of Equinox in 2011 is a perfect example.

Now it looks like Barrick may merge with Newmont Mining (NYSE: NEM). Although the two companies broke off talks recently, they had agreed on everything except which Australian and New Zealand-based mines to divest. Barrick and Newmont could very well resume talks after their annual general meetings at the end of April.

So Barrick’s shareholders should be worried, right? Not necessarily. Here are three reasons why Barrick shareholders should applaud such a merger.

1. Reduced costs

So-called synergies are always a rationale used to justify large mergers, but often fail to materialize. In this situation however, there are plenty of opportunities for cost savings. The two companies operate neighbouring mines in Peru, Australia, and (most importantly) Nevada. The larger company would also have more bargaining power with labour, suppliers, and governments.

Barrick and Newmont have identified $1 billion in cost saving opportunities. Since the two companies together produced 12 million ounces of gold last year, the cost savings work out to about $85 per ounce, just based on that rough math. This is not a small amount at all.

A fresh start

The past couple of years have not been kind to any of the gold miners, especially Barrick. Not only has the company had to deal with falling gold prices, but has also had to deal with operational and governance issues.

The new company would install Gary Goldberg, who currently heads Newmont, as CEO. The chairman of the board would be John Thornton, current co-chairman of Barrick. Peter Munk is retiring.

Overall, there would be a mixture of executives and directors from both companies. This could provide the company a chance to start over, which would be a welcome relief to tired and frustrated Barrick shareholders.

As an added bonus, the new company could even adopt a new name. Barrick shareholders would probably support that.

Timing

A year ago, Barrick had just announced the deferral of its Pascua Lama project, leaving its shares in ruins. But since then, the stock price has been flat. Meanwhile, Newmont’s shares have continued dropping, falling 24% over the past year. Since this is an all-stock merger proposal, Barrick shareholders get a much better deal now than they would have a year ago.

Based on current share prices, Barrick shareholders would own about 60% of the combined company. If this same deal had been done the year before, Barrick shareholders would own less than half.

If this deal goes through and gold prices recover, Barrick’s executives will be commended for picking up Newmont while it was cheap.

Foolish bottom line

Even though this deal is officially off for now, that does not mean it is dead. And if it eventually goes through, it wouldn’t be such bad news for Barrick’s shareholders. In fact it might even provide some much-needed relief.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article.

More on Investing

Hands holding trophy cup on sky background
Investing

3 Growth Stocks That Could Be Huge Winners in the Next Decade and Beyond

Here are three top TSX growth stocks that may be worth a look, given the significant valuation declines these stocks…

Read more »

edit Back view of hugging couple standing with real estate agent in front of house for sale
Dividend Stocks

Why Real Estate Stocks Are a No-Brainer Addition to Your Portfolio

Real estate stocks, especially REITs, offer some distinct advantages over other types of stocks, making them must-have additions to most…

Read more »

Man data analyze
Stocks for Beginners

Beginners: 2 Market-Beating Stocks Just Getting Started

Brookfield Asset Management (TSX:BAM.A)(NYSE:BAM) and Constellation Software (TSX:CSU) are proven market beaters that could continue their ways.

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

Small OPEC+ Oil-Output Hike: Buy More Energy Stocks?

Energy stocks could soar higher, because oil markets will remain tight due to the small production increase by OPEC+.

Read more »

Various Canadian dollars in gray pants pocket
Dividend Stocks

3 Top TSX Dividend Stocks to Buy for Monthly Passive Income

Top TSX stocks with monthly dividends now trade at cheap prices for investors seeking passive income.

Read more »

edit Person using calculator next to charts and graphs
Investing

Where to Invest $500 in the TSX Right Now

Long-term investors can look to buy stocks, including Suncor Energy and Shopify, as they are poised to outpace the broader…

Read more »

Canadian Dollars
Dividend Stocks

Create Free Passive Income and Turn it Into Thousands With 1 TSX Stock

If you can't afford to invest, you can certainly create passive income another way and use that to invest in…

Read more »

falling red arrow and lifting
Investing

2 Oversold TSX Stocks That Should Bounce Back

Stocks that are oversold without an external catalyst like a market crash or a weak sector might be risky buys,…

Read more »