3 Canadian Retailers That May Not Be Around in 2016

Investors should stay away from these struggling retailers at all costs.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

When you look at a list of underperforming stocks over the past few years, many retail names pop up. Thanks to a tough market and American chains using Canada as a testing ground for worldwide expansion, many weaker retailers have been plagued by underperformance.

The other problem is the leaders are really good. Walmart is the best retailer in the world, and its Canadian operations are run quite well, even by its lofty standards. Loblaw is the leader in Canada for a reason. It has a presence in every province, and its stores are a testament to good merchandising and solid management.

Because the competition is so great, there are several Canadian retailers that may not survive much longer. Some are actively trying to salvage their struggling stores, while others are just waiting to pull the plug. In any case, investors looking to get into Canada’s retailers would be wise to avoid these three struggling companies.

Target

When I think of Target’s (NYSE: TGT) entry into Canada, one word immediately comes to mind — disaster.

Since opening the bulk of its 140 stores in March of last year, the company has been weighed down by supply chain issues, empty shelves, and lower sales than expected. Since launching, Target’s Canadian operations have lost nearly $1 billion, and it doesn’t look like the losses are close to being finished.

The company’s U.S.-based management is well aware of the quagmire. Canada’s poor performance is one of the reasons why CEO Gregg Steinhafel lost his job earlier this year. Analysts expect the red ink to continue until a minimum of 2016, and possibly longer. Winning back jilted customers is difficult, especially in a market as tough as Canada’s.

Once the company finds a permanent CEO, Canada could very well be on the chopping block, for good.

Sears Canada

Unlike most of Canada’s struggling retailers, Sears Canada (TSX: SCC) has all but thrown in the towel.

After being used for years as a quasi-ATM by its U.S. parent, the company has recently put itself up for sale. It’s already sold off much of its most valuable real estate, as well as the credit card division. There isn’t much left of any value.

There are still nearly 200 corporate locations (as well as a similar number of franchised outlets), a small chain of travel centres, and an appliance repair and maintenance business. There are certainly some assets there, but what company wants to buy up a struggling retailer to try to compete in one of the world’s most competitive retail markets? Sears will be waiting a long time to find a suitor.

Indigo Books and Music

I have a confession to make. Sometimes, I go into Indigo (TSX: IDG) bookstores and just snap pictures of the books I want to read using my smartphone. I’m surprised nobody has kicked me out, to be honest.

It’s just too easy to go into one of the company’s stores and use it as a browsing area to find interesting books to buy at Amazon for 30% cheaper. Sure, Indigo is trying to expand into housewares and music, but these will never replace books as the main driver. Retailers have a pretty poor track record when they try to reinvent themselves.

Indigo is sitting on quite a bit of cash and no debt, but it lost over $1 per share in 2013. The company perhaps has a future as an online only bookseller with a few select retail locations, but if it insists on carrying on in its current form, it’s only a matter of time before the cash runs out.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Nelson Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Amazon.com. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com.

More on Investing

investment research
Dividend Stocks

Better RRSP Buy: BCE or Royal Bank Stock?

BCE and Royal Bank have good track records of dividend growth.

Read more »

Payday ringed on a calendar
Dividend Stocks

Want $500 in Monthly Passive Income? Buy 5,177 Shares of This TSX Stock 

Do you want to earn $500 in monthly passive income? Consider buying 5,177 shares of this stock and also get…

Read more »

Double exposure of a businessman and stairs - Business Success Concept
Tech Stocks

Why Shares of Meta Stock Are Falling This Week

Meta (NASDAQ:META) stock plunged as much as 19%, despite beating first-quarter earnings, so what gives?

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

3 No-Brainer Stocks I’d Buy Right Now Without Hesitation

These three Canadian stocks are some of the best to buy now, from a reliable utility company to a high-potential…

Read more »

Pumps await a car for fueling at a gas and diesel station.
Dividend Stocks

Down by 9%: Is Alimentation Couche-Tard Stock a Buy in April?

Even though a discount alone shouldn't be the primary reason to choose a stock, it can be an important incentive…

Read more »

Credit card, online shopping, retail
Tech Stocks

Nuvei Stock Up 49% As It Goes Private: Is There More Upside?

After almost four years of a rollercoaster ride, Nuvei stock is going off the TSX charts with a private equity…

Read more »

oil tank at night
Energy Stocks

3 Energy Stocks Already Worth Your While

Are you worried about the future of energy stocks? Leave your worries in the past with these three energy stocks…

Read more »

sad concerned deep in thought
Tech Stocks

Is BlackBerry Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?

BlackBerry stock is down in the dumps right now, but the value of its business is potentially very significant, making…

Read more »