The New Merger Strategy Won’t Help Canadian Pacific Railway Limited

Because of strict regulatory hurdles and an unmoved executive team, I don’t imagine that Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX:CP)(NYSE:CP) will be able to merge with Norfolk Southern Corp. (NYSE:NSC).

The Motley Fool

Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX: CP)(NYSE: CP) is in the news again because it is not giving up on its attempt to merge with Norfolk Southern Corp. (NYSE: NSC), one of the main railroads in the United States. Its first offer was for Norfolk Southern investors to receive $46.72 in cash and an additional 0.348 shares of the new railroad. When that was rejected, Canadian Pacific went back to the drawing board.

Its second offer is one that will have Norfolk investors rewarded sooner, but with less cash. The new offer is for $32.86 in cash plus 0.451 shares of stock in the new company. The reason investors might like this is because they would get the cash in May 2016 rather than at the end of 2017. This is through a tactic known as a “voting trust.”

In essence, one of the railroads (most likely Canadian Pacific) will be held in this voting trust, which will result in the two companies remaining independent, but Norfolk investors get their money early.

Canadian Pacific hopes that the early money will encourage investors to push the executive team to make a deal. If the deal were to happen, Canadian Pacific would gain access to 20,000 miles of Norfolk Southern track across 22 states. It would have access to the entire eastern United States. But most importantly, it would connect with Norfolk track in Chicago and Kansas City, allowing the railroad to continue operating rather than switching trains.

Right now, Canadian Pacific has to pull into Chicago, unload all of the goods that it is carrying, and then have them loaded on to a competitor railroad to go the rest of the way. If this merger occurs, there will be no delay in Chicago.

Regulators won’t let it happen

While the voting trust is an interesting way to expedite the deal process, it’s incredibly unlikely that the Surface Transportation Board (STB) of the United States is going to allow the merger to take place. What the STB looks for with mergers is whether or not the merger will help the “public interest.” The STB said in a ruling that if two Class I railroads were to merge, it would require a demonstration that competition would be preserved.

How does taking two of the largest railroads in North America and combining them together result in more competition? It doesn’t. And the STB is serious about preventing these sorts of anti-competitive mergers. On December 20, 1999, BNSF Railway (which Warren Buffett now owns) and Canadian National Railway Company announced that the two railroads would be forming North American Railways, a company with 50,000 miles of track.

The STB intervened and put a 15-month moratorium on the merger. The two companies sued, but after a while, they gave up and called off the merger. I anticipate that the same thing will occur with Norfolk Southern and Canadian Pacific if the latter can convince the former that a merger is a good idea.

My recommendation is to wait. First Canadian Pacific will need to convince Norfolk Southern that this is a good deal. Once that is done, the STB will get involved and look to prevent the merger if competition is not preserved. If the momentum changes and it appears that the merger could happen, owning shares of that large railroad may be a smart move. But right now, there remains too much uncertainty for me to act.

Fool contributor Jacob Donnelly has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Canadian National Railway. The Motley Fool owns shares of Canadian National Railway. Canadian National Railway is a recommendation of Stock Advisor Canada.

More on Investing

young adult uses credit card to shop online
Tech Stocks

Is Shopify Stock Too Expensive? A Great Quarter Meets a Sky-High Valuation

Shopify's latest quarter was impressive, but its expensive valuation could make investors think twice before buying.

Read more »

Person holding a smartphone with a stock chart on screen
Dividend Stocks

For BCE vs. Enbridge, a 5.7% Yield vs. 5.9% (And the One I’d Prefer for Income)

Both BCE and Enbridge offer attractive income, but BCE is a higher-risk turnaround opportunity, whereas Enbridge offers a more predictable…

Read more »

man shops in a drugstore
Dividend Stocks

How Much to Invest in RioCan for $300 a Month in Dividends

How much should you invest in RioCan for $300 a month in dividends? Explore its retail business, monthly payout and…

Read more »

A close up color image of a small green plant sprouting out of a pile of Canadian dollar coins "loonies."
Dividend Stocks

Telus Dividend Safety: Is the Stock Still Worth Buying for Income?

Explore the latest insights on Telus dividend amid a challenging earnings report and management's new Transformation Strategy.

Read more »

Quality Control Inspectors at Waste Management Facility
Stocks for Beginners

Would I Buy Waste Connections for a 10-Year TFSA? Here’s My Case

Waste Connections earns my interest for a 10-year TFSA, with recurring demand and cash generation balanced against a demanding valuation.

Read more »

AI image of a face with chips
Tech Stocks

Thomson Reuters Sells the Majority of Its Print Business as It Bets on AI: Can the Suffering Stock Bounce Back?

Learn how Thomson Reuters recovered from a 62% dip and what the future holds for its major revenue segments.

Read more »

voice-recognition-talking-to-a-smartphone
Dividend Stocks

BCE Just Reported: What $10,000 Could Earn You in Dividends Today

BCE is yielding a very generous 5.2%, as the company's telecom business improves and long-term investments drive growth.

Read more »

Transparent umbrella under heavy rain against water drops splash background. Rainy weather concept.
Dividend Stocks

Is Intact’s Rough Quarter a Blip or the New Normal for Canadian Insurers?

Intact reported $660 million in pre-tax catastrophe losses during the quarter, which dragged its net operating income per share lower.

Read more »