Why Home Capital Group Inc.’s Large Cash Balance Is a Massive Liability

Why the $1.2 billion of cash sitting on Home Capital Group Inc.’s (TSX:HCG) balance sheet is a massive liability, symptomatic of larger issues within the business.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

In this article, I’ll attempt to shed some light on the banking industry for new investors and those who are interested in learning how to read the balance sheets of lending institutions at a basic level.

First of all, the financial statements of many firms, including Home Capital Group Inc. (TSX:HCG), are very difficult to fully understand. Securitization of mortgages through the Canada Mortgage Bond program, mortgage-backed securities, and the company’s off-balance sheet activities are all topics for another day.

What I will talk about, however, is how cash is viewed from a financial institution’s point of view and how analysts tend to treat cash reserves on lenders’ balance sheets.

Assets minus liabilities equals equity

This is the most fundamental equation in accounting.

Let’s look first at what “cash” really is for a bank.

For a non-financial institution, cash is generated through some value-added activity that results in a sale of a product or service at a markup from its cost base. For a bank, however, cash is generated through deposits via locked-in guaranteed investment certificates (GICs) or through demand deposits (what would amount to a typical personal or business chequing account).

These deposits cost money. When looking at Home Bank’s list of deposit rates on the Home Trust website (the operating subsidiary of Home Capital), we can see that a five-year locked-in GIC pays out a rate of 2.1%. Compared to other financial institutions, these rates are very attractive for depositors, but they also represent a significant cost to Home Capital for borrowing money.

Over 80% of Home Capital’s deposits are locked in, and of those, the vast majority have terms less than five years. In fact, 59.6% of Home Capital’s borrowings (or cash) from deposits have terms of less than one year, meaning they could be called by depositors in the short term and would be considered current liabilities.

The majority of the deposits (cash) borrowed from depositors at a rate of interest have been reinvested in mortgage assets; however, a large chunk of the money ($1.2 billion) is still sitting on the company’s balance sheet unused. This money could be used to generate new mortgages at higher rates of interest; the average interest rate of a residential mortgage for Home Capital is 4.63%, meaning that excess cash sitting on Home Capital’s balance sheet is a massive liability, costing the company money and lowering its overall returns.

A specific amount of cash needs to be kept on hand to meet the regulatory burdens placed on lenders, including the newly introduced Basel III capital requirements. As it stands, Home Capital currently carries approximately double the required cash on its balance sheet to meet these reserve requirements, meaning that a combination of two likely scenarios is at play here.

First, Home Capital has been having difficulty originating new loans due to various scandals of late. This cash may represent a lack of deal flow coming in. Second, management may realize that the high-risk non-prime loans given to immigrants and those with low or no credit may require more cash in case of a loss, leading to the cash pile up.

Other Fool contributors, such as Ryan Goldsman, have talked at length about Home Capital’s large cash balance as a source of balance sheet strength; however, I view it as a massive liability.

Stay Foolish, my friends.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Chris MacDonald has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC.

More on Stocks for Beginners

A glass jar resting on its side with Canadian banknotes and change inside.
Stocks for Beginners

How to Grow Your TFSA Well Past the Average

Need to catch up quick with your TFSA? Consider some regular contributions to this top bank stock, as well as…

Read more »

An investor uses a tablet
Stocks for Beginners

Prediction: Here Are the Most Promising Canadian Stocks for 2025

Here are three top Canadian stocks that could deliver solid returns on your investments in 2025.

Read more »

Top TSX Stocks

A 6 Percent Dividend Yield Today! But Here’s Why I’m Buying This TSX Stock for the Long Term

Want a great stock to buy? You will regret not buying this TSX stock and its decades of growth and…

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Dividend Stocks

TELUS Stock Has a Nice Yield, But This Dividend Stock Looks Safer

TELUS stock certainly has a shiny dividend, but the dividend stock simply doesn't look as stable as this other high-yielding…

Read more »

sale discount best price
Stocks for Beginners

Have $2,000? These 2 Stocks Could Be Bargain Buys for 2025 and Beyond

Fairfax Financial Holdings (TSX:FFH) and another bargain buy are fit for new Canadian investors.

Read more »

Rocket lift off through the clouds
Stocks for Beginners

2 Canadian Growth Stocks Set to Skyrocket in the Next 12 Months

Despite delivering disappointing performance in 2024, these two cheap Canadian growth stocks could offer massive upside in 2025.

Read more »

A train passes Morant's curve in Banff National Park in the Canadian Rockies.
Dividend Stocks

1 Magnificent Canadian Stock Down 12% to Buy and Hold Forever

This top stock may be down 12% right now, but don't see that as a problem. See it as a…

Read more »

woman looks at iPhone
Dividend Stocks

Retirees: Is TELUS Stock a Risky Buy?

TELUS stock has long been a strong dividend provider, but what should investors consider now after recent earnings?

Read more »