The Oil Sands Crisis Nobody Is Talking About

The major problem in Alberta’s oil sands that nobody is talking about.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Yesterday evening, French energy giant Total told investors that it would be shuttering its upcoming oil sands project.

The project, dubbed Joslyn, is a joint venture between Total and a number of different oil companies. The most notable partner for Canadian investors is Suncor (TSX: SU)(NYSE: SU), which owns 36.75% of the failed project. This was just barely less than Total’s 38.25% interest.

The head of Total’s Canadian division had this to say about why the company is pulling the plug on the project: “Joslyn is facing the same challenge most of the industry world-wide [is], in the sense that costs are continuing to inflate when the oil price and specifically the netbacks for the oil sands are remaining stable at best — squeezing the margins.”

Joslyn has been plagued with problems from the start. Originally, Total planned to use wells instead of trucks and shovels to extract the bitumen. This quite literally blew up in its face when one of the company’s wells exploded.

This isn’t the first time a joint venture between Suncor and Total has ended up badly. In 2013, both companies decided to call it quits on an upgrader project in the same area called Fort Hills. Suncor’s management hasn’t quite closed the book on either of these failed projects, stating it will likely revisit each in a few years.

Of course, Suncor is still a dominant oil sands player. The company’s most recent results showed production of more than 400,000 barrels of oil per day just from the oil sands, a record high. Suncor is by far the largest producer in the region, easily outpacing other producers like Canadian Oil Sands (TSX: COS), Canadian Natural Resources (TSX: CNQ)(NYSE: CNQ), and Imperial Oil (TSX: IMO)(NYSEMKT: IMO).

The bigger issue

This news is important to investors for one main reason: It symbolizes how much of a problem cost overruns are for oil sands producers.

I’m from rural Alberta. I know many people who have spent time working up in the oil sands. At first, most are gung-ho. There’s a certain excitement about working so far away from home, and their employers ensure everything is taken care of. Huge camps not only house the workers, but also feed them and keep them entertained.

And, of course, there’s the money. Oil sands workers are paid two to three times what regular workers are paid for the same job. It’s not uncommon to see ambitious workers make more than $200,000 per year after tax. There are stories about people heading up to the oil sands as 22-year-old fresh graduates and coming back five years later as millionaires.

And yet, even after all those efforts, oil sands producers are still having problems attracting staff. Many workers go in for a few months at a time and then leave, unable to handle any additional time away from their families. Boredom is a common problem in the camps, and both drug and alcohol use are common.

Oil sands producers are stuck in a tough spot. They need to get employees up to northern Alberta, and are willing to offer a huge premium to do so. Once you factor in other fringe benefits received by staff, this becomes an almost prohibitive cost, especially for producers that have already paid a premium just to be in the region.

During the early days of the oil sands, this wasn’t such a big deal. It was so cheap to produce that increased costs were just a minor inconvenience. These days, that easy oil is mostly a thing of the past. New projects have much higher costs than previous generations, and that’s not even including staff.

Production in the oil sands used to be a slam dunk. Now, cost overruns are a major issue. Investors need to be aware of this, and realize that any sustained drop in oil prices could majorly curtail oil sands production. The days of oil sands operations being low-cost are largely over. Look for more of these projects to be suspended in the future.

Fool contributor Nelson Smith has no position in any stock mentioned in this article. 

More on Investing

Canadian investor contemplating U.S. stocks with multiple doors to choose from.
Energy Stocks

Suncor, Enbridge, or Canadian Natural? Here’s Which Oil Stock Makes Sense for Your Portfolio

Let's compare and contrast three of the best energy stocks in the Canadian market, and see which comes out as…

Read more »

social media scrolling on phone networking
Investing

This TFSA Stock Offers a Rock-Solid 5% Yield

BCE (TSX:BCE) stock looks like a great dividend bargain to pursue as things turn around.

Read more »

monthly calendar with clock
Energy Stocks

Today’s Perfect TFSA Stock: 5% Monthly Income

This top monthly dividend stock yielding 5% is worth considering for investors of nearly all time horizons and risk tolerance…

Read more »

ETFs can contain investments such as stocks
Investing

The Canadian ETFs Most Investors Are Overlooking Right Now

Neither of these ETFs holds flashy companies, but they can make sense for contrarian investors.

Read more »

dividend stocks are a good way to earn passive income
Dividend Stocks

How $14,000 Can Become a Steady TFSA Dividend Income Engine

Investors can build a reliable TFSA dividend strategy by turning $14,000 into steady, tax‑free income with Enbridge, Scotiabank, and Emera.

Read more »

Oil industry worker works in oilfield
Energy Stocks

3 Canadian Energy Stocks That Win When Oil Spikes and Hold Up When it Doesn’t

These energy companies’ operating structures reduce downside risk, making them relatively defensive bets during periods of weak prices.

Read more »

Piggy bank and Canadian coins
Dividend Stocks

1 Single Stock That I’d Hold Forever in a TFSA

This stock is an excellent consideration to buy on dips and hold forever in a TFSA.

Read more »

pig shows concept of sustainable investing
Retirement

How Much Canadians Typically Have in a TFSA by Age 50

Here's what the average TFSA balance is for Canadians at age 50, what it should be, and the pitfalls worth…

Read more »