The 1 Canadian Energy Metric That Matters Most to Investors

In the Canadian oil sands, this metric is the key to lower emissions, lower extraction costs, and higher profit margins.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

In Canada’s oil sands region, there’s one metric that matters more than any other to energy investors. It’s called the steam-to-oil ratio, or SOR. Companies like ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE: CVE)(TSX: CVE) lead the pack when it comes to this important metric, which will yield more profits to investors over the long run.

Drilling down into the SOR

There are two ways to extract oil from the oil sands. In some areas it can be mined at the surface, but everywhere else it’s produced using an in situ process called steam-assisted gravity drainage, or SAGD. For example, Suncor Energy (TSX: SU)(NYSE: SU) produces a lot of oil by mining it at its Base Mine operation.

Furthermore, the company has a steady stream of oil sands mining projects in the future, including its Fort Hills project. Producers like Suncor Energy undertake projects to mine the oil sands because they can recover nearly 90% of the original oil in place, which is substantially more than the 35% that’s recovered from a conventional oil well. However, these mining projects can be really expensive to develop, which is why Suncor recently put its Joslyn oil sands mine project on hold.

Only about 20% of the oil sands can be mined, which is why producers use in situ SAGD processes to extract the rest of the oil. This process uses steam to melt the bitumen and make it viscous enough to flow up a well bore. However, some companies are much better at using less steam to produce this oil, which is where the SOR becomes an important metric. The reason it’s important is because the less steam needed to extract each barrel of oil, the cheaper the extraction costs of the oil, the lower the carbon emissions, and the higher the profit margins.

Cenovus Energy really leads in this key ratio. It has the top four oil sands projects in the industry, three of which are part of a 50% joint venture with ConocoPhillips. Because of this, the company can produce oil for an average supply cost of between $35 to $65 per barrel. That’s as much as half of what it costs its peers, as the global average supply cost of oil is $70 per barrel. This makes Cenovus Energy’s projects among the most profitable in the industry.

The secret to lowering the SOR

One of the secrets companies like ConocoPhillips and Cenovus Energy have found to keeping the SOR low is to use solvents to aid the process. These increase the production rates per well, which lower the SOR and emissions. Peers like Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN) are catching on and testing solvents as well. The company sees solvents decreasing its SOR 15%-50%, which will have a big impact on the economics of its oil sands projects.

In addition to solvents, oil sands producers are investing in technology to reduce the SOR. For example, Suncor Energy invests over $175 million per year in research and development. One of its current targets is to reduce the SOR at its own in situ projects. Meanwhile, Husky Energy (TSX: HSE) is evaluating more than 75 technologies to drive down costs at its Sunrise Energy Project in the oil sands, which delivers first oil this year. Sunrise is just in the first phase of a multi-phase project that’s expected to deliver oil production growth for Husky Energy over the next decade. These technologies that Husky Energy is testing could be the key to turning its next phases into even more profitable projects for the company.

For many oil sands projects the steam-to-oil ratio is the key to developing a profitable project. Right now ConocoPhillips and Cenovus Energy lead the way with the best SORs in the business. However, peers like Devon Energy, Suncor Energy, and Husky Energy are using solvents, as well as investing in new technologies, to improve their own SORs and better compete with the low-cost suppliers. These investments could really pay off for investors, as dropping the SOR will improve profitability.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo owns shares of ConocoPhillips.

More on Investing

A microchip in a circuit board powers artificial intelligence.
Tech Stocks

The Tech Stock I’d Most Want to Buy If I Were Investing Today

Discover why Celestica is a leading tech stock. Learn about its impressive growth and strategic adaptations in the AI landscape.

Read more »

Trans Alaska Pipeline with Autumn Colors
Energy Stocks

Here’s the TFSA Strategy I’d Be Following Heading Into the Rest of 2026

TC Energy (TSX:TRP) could be a great dividend and value buy for 2026.

Read more »

shoppers in an indoor mall
Dividend Stocks

This Monthly TFSA Stock Pays a 5.4% Dividend – and It’s Worth Considering Now

Discover effective ways to secure a monthly income through rental properties, expenses, and real-estate investment trusts.

Read more »

ETFs can contain investments such as stocks
Dividend Stocks

The 2 ETFs I’d Be Most Excited to Own Heading Through the Rest of 2026

Here's why these two ETFs offering a combination of value, income and growth potential are two of the best picks…

Read more »

some REITs give investors exposure to commercial real estate
Dividend Stocks

Dreaming of a TFSA Million? Here’s How Much You’d Need to Set Aside Each Month

A million-dollar TFSA in 10 years takes serious monthly saving, and Altus Group could be one TSX stock to help.

Read more »

stock chart
Stocks for Beginners

3 Stocks I’m Continuing to Buy Despite the Market Sell-Off

These three TSX stocks look built for rough markets because they keep earning money and don’t rely on hype.

Read more »

Person holds banknotes of Canadian dollars
Dividend Stocks

How to Turn Your 2026 TFSA Contribution Into $70,000 or More

If you invest your $7,000 of TFSA cash at a 15% average rate of return for 20 years, your investment…

Read more »

dividend stocks are a good way to earn passive income
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks Worth a Spot in Nearly Any Canadian Portfolio

These five dividend stocks combine consistent income with long-term growth potential.

Read more »