The Secret That Barrick Gold Doesn’t Want You to Know

Barrick, as well as its peers, is obscuring some very valuable information about production costs. So should you just buy a gold ETF instead?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

There is a constant debate raging among gold enthusiasts about which is better: buying gold mining stocks, or buying a gold ETF? To answer that question, one has to answer a few other questions about the miners. How much do they mine? Are their productions growing? What do their balance sheets look like? How much does it cost them to produce an ounce of gold?

This last question is crucial, but very difficult to answer, and this is no accident. Let me explain, using Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) as an example.

How much does it cost?

Just looking at Barrick’s annual report is enough to make someone’s head spin. The company presents no less than three different ways to measure unit costs: adjusted operating costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce.

Here’s what I would like to know instead. One, how much does it cost to find an ounce? Two, how much does it cost to dig it out of the ground? Finding that exact information in Barrick’s numbers is not easy.

What happens if one just uses the final number, “all-in costs” per ounce? After all, production is not growing at Barrick, so every dollar the company spends seems to be in an effort to maintain its current output. Well, that number was about $1,300 last year. This is where the price of gold is today. So there’s a very good chance that gold prices need to rise for Barrick to be profitable at all.

The same at other companies

Looking at other companies tells a similar story. For example, Kinross Gold (TSX: K)(NYSE: KGC) reports a number for “attributable production cost of sales from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold” and “attributable all-in sustaining cost from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold”. Is this confusing enough?

Kinross emphasizes the second number, implying that it is the most important one. However, that number excludes more than half of capital expenditures. Like Barrick, Kinross isn’t growing — so why are so many costs excluded? Unlike Barrick, Kinross doesn’t even present an “all-in costs” number. If it did, it would come in at over $1,350.

So what should you do?

It’s quite simple. If you think the price of gold is going to rise, then buy a gold ETF. Two options are the Claymore Gold Bullion ETF (TSX: CGL) and the iShares Gold Trust (TSX: IGT)(NYSE: IAU). With either of these options, you don’t have to worry about
confusing annual reports or skyrocketing costs.

If you’d rather invest in stocks, you should avoid gold altogether.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

data analyze research
Investing

The Canadian Stocks I’d Prioritize If I Had $5,000 to Invest Right Now

These Canadian stocks are operating in these fast-growing markets with the potential to generate substantial returns over time.

Read more »

customer uses bank ATM
Bank Stocks

2 Canadian Dividend Giants to Buy With Rates on Hold

Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS) and other major banks might be a great dividend buy as interest rates stay stuck…

Read more »

Happy golf player walks the course
Investing

How to Structure a $50,000 TFSA for Practically Constant Income

This TSX fund pays a $0.1 per share monthly distribution, which makes passive income planning extremely easy.

Read more »

Aerial view of a wind farm
Energy Stocks

This Canadian Energy Stock Could Have its Biggest Year Yet

Northland Power’s pullback could be setting up a comeback as big offshore wind projects ramp and the dividend reset makes…

Read more »

woman considering the future
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Stocks to Hold Comfortably for the Next 5 Years

These dividend stocks stand out as attractive long-term holdings, backed by resilient businesses and solid dividend-growth.

Read more »

warehouse worker takes inventory in storage room
Tech Stocks

1 Magnificent Canadian Tech Stock Down 33% to Buy and Hold for Decades

Down 33% from all-time highs, this TSX tech stock could deliver market-beating returns over the next four years.

Read more »

Happy shoppers look at a cellphone.
Dividend Stocks

1 Top Dividend Stock to Buy and Hold for 10 Years

Considering its proven track record of monthly distributions and high-yielding returns, this dividend stock is too attractive to ignore.

Read more »

Senior uses a laptop computer
Investing

2 Growth Stocks Set to Skyrocket in 2026 and Beyond

Here are the top two picks to consider if you want to inject high-growth potential into your self-directed investment portfolio.

Read more »