The Secret That Barrick Gold Doesn’t Want You to Know

Barrick, as well as its peers, is obscuring some very valuable information about production costs. So should you just buy a gold ETF instead?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

There is a constant debate raging among gold enthusiasts about which is better: buying gold mining stocks, or buying a gold ETF? To answer that question, one has to answer a few other questions about the miners. How much do they mine? Are their productions growing? What do their balance sheets look like? How much does it cost them to produce an ounce of gold?

This last question is crucial, but very difficult to answer, and this is no accident. Let me explain, using Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) as an example.

How much does it cost?

Just looking at Barrick’s annual report is enough to make someone’s head spin. The company presents no less than three different ways to measure unit costs: adjusted operating costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce.

Here’s what I would like to know instead. One, how much does it cost to find an ounce? Two, how much does it cost to dig it out of the ground? Finding that exact information in Barrick’s numbers is not easy.

What happens if one just uses the final number, “all-in costs” per ounce? After all, production is not growing at Barrick, so every dollar the company spends seems to be in an effort to maintain its current output. Well, that number was about $1,300 last year. This is where the price of gold is today. So there’s a very good chance that gold prices need to rise for Barrick to be profitable at all.

The same at other companies

Looking at other companies tells a similar story. For example, Kinross Gold (TSX: K)(NYSE: KGC) reports a number for “attributable production cost of sales from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold” and “attributable all-in sustaining cost from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold”. Is this confusing enough?

Kinross emphasizes the second number, implying that it is the most important one. However, that number excludes more than half of capital expenditures. Like Barrick, Kinross isn’t growing — so why are so many costs excluded? Unlike Barrick, Kinross doesn’t even present an “all-in costs” number. If it did, it would come in at over $1,350.

So what should you do?

It’s quite simple. If you think the price of gold is going to rise, then buy a gold ETF. Two options are the Claymore Gold Bullion ETF (TSX: CGL) and the iShares Gold Trust (TSX: IGT)(NYSE: IAU). With either of these options, you don’t have to worry about
confusing annual reports or skyrocketing costs.

If you’d rather invest in stocks, you should avoid gold altogether.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Target. Stand out from the crowd
Investing

Finning International: A Reasonable Buy Here

Finning International is a cyclical dividend stock that offers decent long-term returns potential of north of 10%.

Read more »

Dollar symbol and Canadian flag on keyboard
Stocks for Beginners

TFSA: 4 Canadian Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever

Here are four stocks that you can buy and hold for decades in your TFSA.

Read more »

tsx today
Stock Market

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Tuesday, April 23

Important economic data from the United States could keep TSX stocks volatile this morning as falling metal prices pressure the…

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

Buy 3,000 Shares of This Super Dividend Stock For $3,300/Year in Passive Income

Are you looking for a super dividend stock to buy now and generate a whopping passive-income stream? Here's an option…

Read more »

Question marks in a pile
Dividend Stocks

Where Will Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Stock Be in 5 Years?

BIP (TSX:BIP) stock fell dramatically after year-end earnings, but there could be momentum in the future with more acquisitions on…

Read more »

Utility, wind power
Dividend Stocks

So You Own Algonquin Stock: Is It Still a Good Investment?

Should you buy Algonquin for its big dividend? Looking forward, the utility is making a lot of changes.

Read more »

Big Bitcoin logo.
Investing

2 Cheap Stocks to Add to Your TFSA Before They Get Expensive

If you want to buy the dip and sell the rally, these two TSX stocks are a bargain you don’t…

Read more »

Young adult woman walking up the stairs with sun sport background
Stocks for Beginners

New to Investing? This Step-by-Step Guide Will Get You Started

New to investing? Then follow this guide to help you get started, by paying off your debts and saving towards…

Read more »