The Secret That Barrick Gold Doesn’t Want You to Know

Barrick, as well as its peers, is obscuring some very valuable information about production costs. So should you just buy a gold ETF instead?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

There is a constant debate raging among gold enthusiasts about which is better: buying gold mining stocks, or buying a gold ETF? To answer that question, one has to answer a few other questions about the miners. How much do they mine? Are their productions growing? What do their balance sheets look like? How much does it cost them to produce an ounce of gold?

This last question is crucial, but very difficult to answer, and this is no accident. Let me explain, using Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) as an example.

How much does it cost?

Just looking at Barrick’s annual report is enough to make someone’s head spin. The company presents no less than three different ways to measure unit costs: adjusted operating costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce.

Here’s what I would like to know instead. One, how much does it cost to find an ounce? Two, how much does it cost to dig it out of the ground? Finding that exact information in Barrick’s numbers is not easy.

What happens if one just uses the final number, “all-in costs” per ounce? After all, production is not growing at Barrick, so every dollar the company spends seems to be in an effort to maintain its current output. Well, that number was about $1,300 last year. This is where the price of gold is today. So there’s a very good chance that gold prices need to rise for Barrick to be profitable at all.

The same at other companies

Looking at other companies tells a similar story. For example, Kinross Gold (TSX: K)(NYSE: KGC) reports a number for “attributable production cost of sales from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold” and “attributable all-in sustaining cost from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold”. Is this confusing enough?

Kinross emphasizes the second number, implying that it is the most important one. However, that number excludes more than half of capital expenditures. Like Barrick, Kinross isn’t growing — so why are so many costs excluded? Unlike Barrick, Kinross doesn’t even present an “all-in costs” number. If it did, it would come in at over $1,350.

So what should you do?

It’s quite simple. If you think the price of gold is going to rise, then buy a gold ETF. Two options are the Claymore Gold Bullion ETF (TSX: CGL) and the iShares Gold Trust (TSX: IGT)(NYSE: IAU). With either of these options, you don’t have to worry about
confusing annual reports or skyrocketing costs.

If you’d rather invest in stocks, you should avoid gold altogether.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

jar with coins and plant
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Stocks to Hold for the Next 20 Years

TD Bank (TSX:TD) and other dividend growers worth owning for decades and decades.

Read more »

cookies stack up for growing profit
Investing

2 TSX Stocks to Help Supercharge Your TFSA Returns

These TSX stocks can supercharge your TFSA returns driven by durable, long-term demand trends and multi-year growth.

Read more »

runner checks her biodata on smartwatch
Dividend Stocks

3 Canadian Dividend Stocks Yielding Up to 4% for When the Market Stops Chasing Growth

When investors tire of hype and want something tangible, reliable dividend cheques can pull money back into steady stocks.

Read more »

Canadian Dollars bills
Dividend Stocks

Invest $45,000 in This Dividend Stock for $250 in Monthly Passive Income

SmartCentres REIT’s high yield makes monthly passive income achievable. Here’s how much you need to generate $250 monthly from this…

Read more »

Business success of growth metaverse finance and investment profit graph concept or development analysis progress chart on financial market achievement strategy background with increase hand diagram
Dividend Stocks

3 Monster Dividend Stocks With Yields of up to 5.2%

Considering their solid fundamentals, long-standing dividend history, and healthy growth prospects, these three dividend stocks offer attractive buying opportunities.

Read more »

investor faces bear market
Investing

If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX:ATD) seems like one of the timlier bets on the market these days.

Read more »

earn passive income by investing in dividend paying stocks
Energy Stocks

The 1 TFSA Stock I’d Set, Forget, and Never Touch Again

If you’re looking for a reliable TFSA stock to hold for decades, this one checks nearly every box.

Read more »

man gives stopping gesture
Dividend Stocks

3 TSX Dividend Stocks for Investors Who Want to Stop Watching the Market

Calm investors don’t chase hype. They buy steady dividend businesses that keep paying through the noise.

Read more »