Restaurant Brands International Inc.: Troubled Times Ahead?

The latest quarterly report from Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX:QSR)(NYSE:QSR) was a mixed bag. Should shareholders reconsider owning its stock? Absolutely. Here’s why.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX:QSR)(NYSE:QSR) was on a roll until it reported third-quarter earnings October 24. It was a mixed bag, to say the least. The Burger King and Tim Hortons parent saw its stock drop almost 7% in a single week as investors got a major case of indigestion on the news.

While profits were better in the latest quarter, it’s the top line that should have shareholders seriously reconsidering owning QSR stock.

Burger King

QSR’s fast-food burger chain saw its comparable sales increase by 1.7% in Q3–450 basis points fewer than in the same quarter a year earlier. Meanwhile, although system-wide sales increased 7% in the quarter to US$4.8 billion, it was 420 basis points lower than in Q3 2015.

These aren’t terrible numbers, but you’ve got to consider them in the context of its industry and peers. McDonald’s Corporation (NYSE:MCD) had third-quarter global comparable sales that increased by 3.5%, or more than double Burger King’s.

That said, Burger King likely performed better than Wendys Co (NASDAQ:WEN) in the third quarter, although we won’t know for sure until November 9 when Wendys releases its latest results. What we do know is that Burger King’s comparable sales in the first two quarters of the year were 130 basis points (Q2) and 200 basis points (Q1) higher than Wendys’.

So, while Burger King isn’t keeping up with the world’s largest restaurant chain, it is holding its own in a very competitive fast-food environment. But it should be a concern for shareholders.

Tim Hortons

Like Burger King, Tim Hortons’s system-wide sales and comparable sales growth weren’t nearly as robust this year as they were in the third quarter last year. Its comparable store sales growth was 2% in Q3 2016–330 basis points fewer than Q3 2015; its system-wide sales growth was 4.8% in Q3 2016–340 basis points fewer than Q3 2015.

Again, like Burger King, it’s important to take these numbers into context before condemning Restaurant Brands International or QSR stock.

How did Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) and Dunkin Brands Group Inc. (NASDAQ:DNKN) do in the same quarter?

Starbucks reports its fourth-quarter results November 3. However, in its Q3 2016 report it projected that its full-year global comparable store sales growth would be mid-single digits. In the quarter ended June 26, 2016, they were up 4%–130 basis points higher than Tim Hortons in the same three-month period.

Meanwhile, Dunkin Brands, which also includes revenue from its Baskin-Robbins brand, saw Q3 2016 comparable store sales grow 2% in the quarter–30 basis points higher than Tim Hortons.

At least on the coffee front, QSR has some work to do.

Bottom line

In the first nine months of 2016, Restaurant Brands International’s adjusted EBITDA increased 12.4% to US$1.38 billion on a 1.3% increase in revenue. On a net-income basis, the numbers in the first nine months of the year look even better–US$654.5 million or 100% higher than a year earlier–providing hope to shareholders that if its business in the emerging markets continues to prosper and it can figure out how to reignite its North American business, a higher future share price is in the cards.

However, I’d rather pay four times sales for SBUX stock than five times sales for QSR. Especially if both Tim Hortons and Burger King continue to experience sluggish comparable sales growth in upcoming quarters.

But it’s your call.

 

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Starbucks. Tom Gardner owns shares of Starbucks. The Motley Fool owns shares of Starbucks. Starbucks is a recommendation of Stock Advisor Canada.

More on Investing

edit Jars of marijuana
Cannabis Stocks

Is Tilray Stock a Buy in the New Bullish Market?

Canadian cannabis producer Tilray has underperformed the broader markets in the last five years due to its weak fundamentals.

Read more »

Woman has an idea
Investing

3 No-Brainer Stocks to Buy With $200 Right Now

These three stocks are no-brainer buys, given their solid underlying businesses and healthy growth prospects.

Read more »

Investing

2 Stocks I’m Loading Up on in 2024

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX:ATD) and another stock that are getting too cheap after their latest corrections.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Dividend Stocks

1 Top Dividend Stock That Can Handle Any Kind of Market (Even Corrections)

While most dividend aristocrats can maintain their payouts during weak markets, very few can maintain a healthy valuation or bounce…

Read more »

Red siren flashing
Dividend Stocks

Income Alert: These Stocks Just Raised Their Dividends

Three established dividend-payers from different sectors are compelling investment opportunities for income-focused investors.

Read more »

online shopping
Tech Stocks

1 Hidden Catalyst That Could Ignite Shopify Stock

Here's why Shopify (TSX:SHOP) ought to remain a top growth stock investors continue to focus on for the long haul.

Read more »

Oil pumps against sunset
Energy Stocks

Is it Too Late to Buy Enbridge Stock?

Besides its juicy and sustainable dividends, Enbridge’s improving long-term growth prospects make it a reliable stock to hold for the…

Read more »

Man considering whether to sell or buy
Tech Stocks

WELL Stock: Buy, Sell, or Hold?

WELL stock has a lot of upside as the company is likely to continue to grow, posting positive earnings in…

Read more »