Aritzia Inc. vs. Canada Goose Holdings Inc.: Which Will Win?

Comparing companies such as Aritzia Inc. (TSX:ATZ) and Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) can be difficult, but it’s a worthwhile exercise for investors considering investing in either of these upstart IPOs.

| More on:
win

Fashion retail is a difficult sector to analyze and invest in for a number of reasons. Among the various quantitative fundamental drivers of the business, two factors that are hard to measure and often give me headaches when looking at companies such as Aritzia Inc. (TSX:ATZ) and Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) are the following:

  1. Qualitative drivers such as brand perception and consumer sentiment surrounding the brands and products offered by these fashion retailers are often hard to capture, even with qualitative surveys and other forms of information gathering.
  2. The quality/value matrix relating to various brands or businesses in fashion retail often changes. Where the product falls in terms of quality vs. affordability largely depends on the ability of a fashion retailer to convince consumers that a product is of the highest quality or is affordable or has whichever mix of attributes best suits the strategic “box” that management wants to tick to determine pricing.

These qualitative factors are important to take into consideration, as brand equity and positive or negative sentiment with respect to the brands offered by fashion retailers play a pivotal role in each company being able to accurately price their offerings and forecast, budget, and turnover inventory effectively.

To put Aritzia and Canada Goose into perspective, I’m going to take a look at another very successful fashion retailer which was originally founded in Canada: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX:LLL)(NASDAQ:LULU). This company reflects both of the recent Canadian IPOs, albeit in different ways.

Lululemon’s business model relies heavily on brand perception, driving consumers to buy the company’s well-perceived product mix at a significant premium to other low-cost providers of athletic wear. In this respect, Canada Goose has done quite a good job of replicating Lululemon’s success in achieving the brand perception and brand equity necessary to price their parkas at the $1,000-per-jacket level.

Both Lululemon and Canada Goose have traded at significant premiums in the market (currently, Canada Goose’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio far exceeds that of Lululemon at 87 times earnings compared to Lululemon’s 25 times earnings).

Aritzia’s more modest P/E multiple (11 times earnings) is likely indicative of investor hesitation with respect to this brand’s ability to grow as quickly and profitably as its competitors. Lululemon’s shift to try to become more mainstream with its recently launched Ivivva brand has turned out to be a misstep; the company announced it will be restructuring Ivivva stores to its traditional Lululemon banners, converting the Ivivva brand to an e-commerce brand.

The acceptance of e-commerce and the rise of online fashion retail as an effective channel for traditional bricks-and-mortar operations to increase revenue is important. As such, mall-based fashion retailers and those focusing on the “old ways” of doing things may simply get lost in the mix.

I remain far more bullish on Canada Goose’s long-term growth prospects as compared to Aritzia; however, I would take caution with the fashion retail industry in general due to long-term headwinds that are likely to cause even the best brands some pain, as we’ve seen with Lululemon.

Stay Foolish, my friends.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Chris MacDonald has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lululemon Athletica.

More on Investing

Beware of bad investing advice.
Investing

2 No-Brainer Growth Stocks to Buy Right Now for Less Than $500

These no-brainer growth stocks have solid fundamentals and are likely to deliver above-average returns in the long term.

Read more »

oil pump jack under night sky
Energy Stocks

1 Energy ETF to Buy With $1,000 and Hold Forever

This Hamilton energy ETF is diversified across North America and pays a 10% yield.

Read more »

bulb idea thinking
Investing

The Smartest Growth Stocks to Buy With $1,000 Right Now

Here are two stocks to buy with $1,000 right now.

Read more »

Canadian dollars are printed
Dividend Stocks

Transform Your TFSA Into a Cash-Creating Machine With $15,000

If you have a windfall of $15,000, putting it in a TFSA is a great start. But investing it in…

Read more »

protect, safe, trust
Stocks for Beginners

2 Safe Canadian Stocks for Cautious Investors

Without taking unnecessary risks, cautious investors in Canada can still build a resilient portfolio by focusing on safe stocks like…

Read more »

tsx today
Stock Market

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Thursday, December 12

TSX investors will watch U.S. wholesale inflation data today as the Bank of Canada’s recent rate cut is likely to…

Read more »

ETF stands for Exchange Traded Fund
Investing

2 High-Yield Dividend ETFs to Buy to Generate Passive Income

Both of these Hamilton ETFs sport double-digit yields with monthly payouts.

Read more »

engineer at wind farm
Energy Stocks

1 Canadian Utility Stock to Buy for Big Total Returns

Let's dive into why Fortis (TSX:FTS) remains a top utility stock long-term investors may want to consider right now.

Read more »