At 135-Times Sales, Cannabis Valuations Make No Sense Whatsoever

Let’s put into perspective what Aurora Cannabis Inc.’s (TSX:ACB) trailing twelve month price to sales ratio actually means.

The claim that businesses introducing innovative and disruptive technologies or those in industries that are still in their infancy with impressive long-term potential for explosive growth should have valuation multiples ascribed to their stock prices is not up for debate. From Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) to Shopify Inc. (TSX: SHOP)(NYSE:SHOP), investors are used to paying extremely high valuation multiples over extended periods in disruptive high-margin companies.

The Canadian cannabis sector has begun to exhibit emerging-tech valuation multiples – valuations that, as I have previously stated, are “exhibiting concrete signs of overvaluation, creeping into bubble territory.”

Case in point: let’s take a look at the trailing twelve-month (TTM) price-to-sales ratios for four of Canada’s largest (publicly traded) cannabis producers:

Company Market Capitalization Price/Sales Ratio
Aurora Cannabis Inc. $3.15 billion 135.6
Aphria Inc. $2.04 billion 92.1
Canopy Growth Corp. $3.71 billion 76.0
Medreleaf Corp. $1.46 billion 35.5

As the chart above shows, Aurora Cannabis Inc. (TSX: ACB) emerges as the clear winner, with a price to TTM sales of 136 taking the cake, while Medreleaf Corp. (TSX:LEAF) comes in at a “measly” 36 times sales, making this $1.5 billion company the “best value” of the bunch using this metric. Aphria Inc. (TSX:APH) and Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX: WEED) round out the group with price/sales multiples of 92 and 76, respectively.

A healthy price-to-sales ratio in most industries tends to be below 1.5. A number of high-profile analysts and academics have pointed to the dangers of investing in companies with price-to sales-ratios above 1.5, given the reality of what a price-to-sales ratio actually means.

In layman’s terms, a price-to-sales ratio of 136 means is that Aurora would need to pay its investors 136 years’ worth of the company’s trailing twelve-month revenue in order for investors to get their money back. This implies a zero cost of goods, 100% profit margin, and stable revenue over time.

As we know, a great deal of growth is forecasted into Aurora’s valuation, and the company is expected to grow at a triple-digit pace for some time to come. That said, the math uses crazy assumptions that bear no resemblance to reality.

I’ve run a financial model on Aurora and extended its 168.6% year-over-year growth rate out five years (the typical length most analysts forecast out to). Assuming investors would pay $7.00 per share in Q4 2022, the valuation still doesn’t make sense.

Do the math, it’s an interesting exercise.

Looking at a price/sales ratio that is currently nearly 100x – considered the top end of the spectrum for investment-grade companies – Aurora’s current valuation doesn’t provide much in the way of room for error.

Valuations for projected market size make no sense, either

Looking at the four aforementioned companies, we can see that the total combined market capitalizations of these firms at the time of writing sits at $10.36 billion, with a total (disputed) estimated market size upon legalization of between $4.2 billion and $6.2 billion in 2018 from the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office. Taking a mid-point of the range at $5.2 billion, and ignoring all the other cannabis producers currently, we can see that four of the largest publicly traded cannabis producers in Canada currently have market capitalizations that are approximately equal to twice the projected 2018 market size for both recreational and medicinal marijuana in Canada (numbers which I believe to be higher than what reality could show).

Again, the market capitalizations of only four companies already amounts to almost exactly twice the projected sales for 2018.

As I’ve mentioned in a previous article, I have many issues with the report from the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office; however, the issues with projected market size aside, it is clear to me that cannabis valuations make no sense.

I invite long-term, value-oriented investors to get a spreadsheet out and try to make the numbers work. I dare you. Just try.

Stay Foolish, my friends.

 

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. David Gardner owns shares of Amazon. Tom Gardner owns shares of Shopify. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon, Shopify, and SHOPIFY INC.

More on Investing

woman holding steering wheel is nervous about the future
Stocks for Beginners

Can You Still Catch Up on Retirement at 55? Here’s What’s Possible

Starting at 55 still leaves room for meaningful progress, with regular contributions and a realistic retirement date improving the numbers.

Read more »

Warning sign with the text "Trade war" in front of container ship
Dividend Stocks

The Canada-U.S. Trade War Drags On: 1 Stock I’d Buy and 1 I’d Avoid

Delve into the trade war that escalated after the USMCA expiration, impacting tariffs and trade dynamics between Canada and the…

Read more »

diversification and asset allocation are crucial investing concepts
Stocks for Beginners

Buying Your First Canadian Stock: A Step-by-Step Walk Through

This step-by-step guide will help you focus on companies with proven track records of solid financial and operational performance over…

Read more »

Happy golf player walks the course
Dividend Stocks

A Top-Notch 5.6% Dividend Stock to Fuel Your Retirement Income Every Month

A high-yield dividend stock with 20 years of consistent monthly payouts can fuel retirement income.

Read more »

A family watches tv using Roku at home.
Dividend Stocks

Rogers vs. BCE: Which Telecom Belongs in Your TFSA?

Rogers and BCE both offer attractive dividend yields, but their different cash flow trends and growth strategies could make one…

Read more »

person with spyglass looks at ocean horizon
Energy Stocks

A 10-Year Look at Building Dividend Income From Monthly Contributions

Ten years of $500 monthly contributions can build meaningful dividend income, with Emera illustrating the role of yield and gradual…

Read more »

dividends grow over time
Stocks for Beginners

Boosting Your Income is Only Half the Battle: What You Do Next Matters More

As you increase your income, also increase the amount you invest for the long term.

Read more »

woman relaxes with phone
Dividend Stocks

TELUS Stock in 3 Years: What $5,000 Invested Today Could Look Like

TELUS cut its dividend 55% and reset its plan. Here is what $5,000 in TELUS stock could be worth by…

Read more »