At 135-Times Sales, Cannabis Valuations Make No Sense Whatsoever

Let’s put into perspective what Aurora Cannabis Inc.’s (TSX:ACB) trailing twelve month price to sales ratio actually means.

The claim that businesses introducing innovative and disruptive technologies or those in industries that are still in their infancy with impressive long-term potential for explosive growth should have valuation multiples ascribed to their stock prices is not up for debate. From Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) to Shopify Inc. (TSX:SHOP)(NYSE:SHOP), investors are used to paying extremely high valuation multiples over extended periods in disruptive high-margin companies.

The Canadian cannabis sector has begun to exhibit emerging-tech valuation multiples – valuations that, as I have previously stated, are “exhibiting concrete signs of overvaluation, creeping into bubble territory.

Case in point: let’s take a look at the trailing twelve-month (TTM) price-to-sales ratios for four of Canada’s largest (publicly traded) cannabis producers:

Company Market Capitalization Price/Sales Ratio
Aurora Cannabis Inc. $3.15 billion 135.6
Aphria Inc. $2.04 billion 92.1
Canopy Growth Corp. $3.71 billion 76.0
Medreleaf Corp. $1.46 billion 35.5

As the chart above shows, Aurora Cannabis Inc. (TSX:ACB) emerges as the clear winner, with a price to TTM sales of 136 taking the cake, while Medreleaf Corp. (TSX:LEAF) comes in at a “measly” 36 times sales, making this $1.5 billion company the “best value” of the bunch using this metric. Aphria Inc. (TSX:APH) and Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX:WEED) round out the group with price/sales multiples of 92 and 76, respectively.

A healthy price-to-sales ratio in most industries tends to be below 1.5. A number of high-profile analysts and academics have pointed to the dangers of investing in companies with price-to sales-ratios above 1.5, given the reality of what a price-to-sales ratio actually means.

In layman’s terms, a price-to-sales ratio of 136 means is that Aurora would need to pay its investors 136 years’ worth of the company’s trailing twelve-month revenue in order for investors to get their money back. This implies a zero cost of goods, 100% profit margin, and stable revenue over time.

As we know, a great deal of growth is forecasted into Aurora’s valuation, and the company is expected to grow at a triple-digit pace for some time to come. That said, the math uses crazy assumptions that bear no resemblance to reality.

I’ve run a financial model on Aurora and extended its 168.6% year-over-year growth rate out five years (the typical length most analysts forecast out to). Assuming investors would pay $7.00 per share in Q4 2022, the valuation still doesn’t make sense.

Do the math, it’s an interesting exercise.

Looking at a price/sales ratio that is currently nearly 100x – considered the top end of the spectrum for investment-grade companies – Aurora’s current valuation doesn’t provide much in the way of room for error.

Valuations for projected market size make no sense, either

Looking at the four aforementioned companies, we can see that the total combined market capitalizations of these firms at the time of writing sits at $10.36 billion, with a total (disputed) estimated market size upon legalization of between $4.2 billion and $6.2 billion in 2018 from the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office. Taking a mid-point of the range at $5.2 billion, and ignoring all the other cannabis producers currently, we can see that four of the largest publicly traded cannabis producers in Canada currently have market capitalizations that are approximately equal to twice the projected 2018 market size for both recreational and medicinal marijuana in Canada (numbers which I believe to be higher than what reality could show).

Again, the market capitalizations of only four companies already amounts to almost exactly twice the projected sales for 2018.

As I’ve mentioned in a previous article, I have many issues with the report from the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office; however, the issues with projected market size aside, it is clear to me that cannabis valuations make no sense.

I invite long-term, value-oriented investors to get a spreadsheet out and try to make the numbers work. I dare you. Just try.

Stay Foolish, my friends.

 

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. David Gardner owns shares of Amazon. Tom Gardner owns shares of Shopify. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon, Shopify, and SHOPIFY INC.

More on Investing

woman gazes forward out window to future
Dividend Stocks

Canadians: Here’s How Much You Need Saved in Your TFSA to Retire

Canadians may need roughly $500,000 in a TFSA to generate sufficient retirement income. Here's how to reach that goal.

Read more »

chart reflected in eyeglass lenses
Investing

Undervalued Canadian Stocks to Consider Now

Given their resilient business models, multiple long-term growth drivers, and attractive valuations, these two undervalued Canadian stocks offer attractive buying…

Read more »

Piggy bank on a flying rocket
Tech Stocks

Got $5,000? Top Canadian Stocks to Buy Right Now

Split $5,000 between a dividend-paying Canadian bank and a fast-growing space stock that could benefit from the next wave of…

Read more »

House models and one with REIT real estate investment trust.
Dividend Stocks

The Perfect TFSA Stock: A 5.1% Yield With Monthly Paycheques

This monthly dividend stock offers a 5.1% yield, a resilient real estate portfolio, and steady growth that could make it…

Read more »

runner checks her biodata on smartwatch
Dividend Stocks

Here’s the Average Canadian TFSA at Age 50

If your TFSA balance is below the average for Canadians in their early 50s, these two proven dividend stocks could…

Read more »

Canada Day fireworks over two Adirondack chairs on the wooden dock in Ontario, Canada
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Super-Stars That Look Strong On Pullbacks

These stocks should be attractive to buy on dips.

Read more »

man in suit looks at a computer with an anxious expression
Dividend Stocks

Why I’d Choose This Dividend Stock Over Telus or BCE Any Day

BCE (TSX:BCE) and Telus (TSX:T) are towering dividend payers, but there are less choppy value bets out there.

Read more »

The sun sets behind a power source
Dividend Stocks

One Canadian Dividend Stock Built to Hold in Any Market Condition

Fortis is a North American utility stock that boasts a 52-year track record of rising dividends and resilience in all…

Read more »