Chaos in the Boardroom: Avoid These 2 Telco Stocks

Investors might have to steer clear of two telco stocks because of a nasty development that has reached the Supreme Court.

| More on:

Unfavourable publicity could hurt shares of publicly-listed companies more than the inherent market volatility. Investors in Rogers Communications (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) could be anxious because their year-to-date gain has shrunk to only 1.04%.

Canada’s third-largest telco is in the news lately because of a family feud that has created boardroom chaos. The Rogers family controls the $29.7 billion communications and media company but members are locked in a battle over who should take charge. A real-life corporate drama is ongoing, and the warring parties are heading to court.

Shaw Communications (TSX:SJR.B)(NYSE:SJR) could be collateral damage in the family infighting. Rogers’ bid to acquire the fourth-largest in the telco sector is pending and under review by industry regulators. If you want exposure to the space, especially the 5G network, steer clear of the two telco stocks until the smoke clears.

Stock performance

Thus far, in 2021, Shaw displays better performance on the TSX. It outperforms Rogers and the broader index with its 63.97% year to date. Likewise, BCE (+23.02%) and Telus (+16.47%) are underperformers if you compare the industry leaders with Shaw.

Rogers hasn’t shown much in the last 12 months to attract investors. At $58.44 per share, the trailing one-year price return is 7.47%. On the other hand, Shaw trades at $35.47 per share, or 69% higher than a year ago. Both are income stocks, with Rogers paying a 3.42% dividend and Shaw offering 3.34%.

Business combination

The proposed business combination between Rogers and Shaw would unseat Telus as the country’s second-largest telco. Rogers’ bid price is around $26 billion, although the deal is far from completion. Many parties, including BCE, Telus, and Corus Entertainment, oppose the merger.

BCE, through Bell Canada, wrote to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) saying that Rogers’ takeover of Shaw would allow for an unprecedented level of market power. If approved, Rogers will gain 47% control of the English-language broadcasting distribution market.

The Competition Bureau is conducting a probe on whether the merger will reduce or prevent competition. Shaw’s management won’t comment on the fight among members of the Rogers family. However, its CEO Brad Shaw said the $17.73 billion communications firm is committed to closing the transaction.

Court battle

The tussle for board control between Edward Rogers, son of the late Rogers founder Ted Rogers, and his mother with his sisters could be uglier than now during the court battle. The fight started with the failed plan by Edward to oust CEO Joe Natale and replace him with the company’s CFO. He lost confidence in the current CEO.

Now, Edward Rogers wants the Supreme Court of British Columbia to declare the newly constituted board legitimate. The faction of the mother-sisters backs Natale and believes he is the right CEO to lead and complete the Shaw deal. Also, Edward Rogers and fellow board member John MacDonald claim to be Rogers’ Chairman in their respective boards.

Is a freefall next?

I’m not sure if the court battle will trigger the freefall of Rogers’ shares. The stock price has dropped 5% since October 20, 2021. Meanwhile, Shaw looks safe for now. After three quarters in 2021, management reported 43.1% and 31.3% growths in net income and free cash flow compared to the same period in 2020.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Christopher Liew has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. CL B NV and TELUS CORPORATION.

More on Dividend Stocks

money goes up and down in balance
Dividend Stocks

This 6% Dividend Stock Is My Top Pick for Immediate Income

This Canadian stock has resilient business model, solid dividend payment and growth history, and a well-protected yield of over 6%.

Read more »

ways to boost income
Dividend Stocks

1 Excellent TSX Dividend Stock, Down 25%, to Buy and Hold for the Long Term

Down 25% from all-time highs, Tourmaline Oil is a TSX dividend stock that offers you a tasty yield of 5%…

Read more »

Start line on the highway
Dividend Stocks

1 Incredibly Cheap Canadian Dividend-Growth Stock to Buy Now and Hold for Decades

CN Rail (TSX:CNR) stock is incredibly cheap, but should investors join insiders by buying the dip?

Read more »

bulb idea thinking
Dividend Stocks

Down 13%, This Magnificent Dividend Stock Is a Screaming Buy

Sometimes, a moderately discounted, safe dividend stock is better than heavily discounted stock, offering an unsustainably high yield.

Read more »

Canadian Dollars bills
Dividend Stocks

Invest $15,000 in This Dividend Stock, Create $5,710.08 in Passive Income

This dividend stock is the perfect option if you're an investor looking for growth, as well as passive income through…

Read more »

A Canada Pension Plan Statement of Contributions with a 100 dollar banknote and dollar coins.
Dividend Stocks

3 Compelling Reasons to Delay Taking CPP Benefits Until Age 70

You don't need to take CPP early if you are receiving large dividend payments from Fortis Inc (TSX:FTS) stock.

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Dividend Stocks

Better Dividend Stock: TC Energy vs. Enbridge

TC Energy and Enbridge have enjoyed big rallies in 2024. Is one stock still cheap?

Read more »

Concept of multiple streams of income
Dividend Stocks

Got $10,000? Buy This Dividend Stock for $4,992.40 in Total Passive Income

Want almost $5,000 in annual passive income? Then you need a company bound for even more growth, with a dividend…

Read more »