Should Shareholders of Rogers Communications Inc. Worry About the CRTC’s Pick-And-Pay TV Plan?

What does Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) need to charge to keep its TV business profitable in the wake of proposed CRTC changes? Here I do the math.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Late last week, the CRTC released its working discussion document on the future on the television industry. Canadians will have until September 19th, the last public hearing date, to provide feedback and comments to the CRTC.

What do investors need to know?

1. Basic package

Canadians would be able to purchase a basic cable or satellite package between $20 and $30.

The actual impact on telecom companies would most likely be small. Good content remains key. American networks usually have bigger budgets to produce larger shows, thus attracting a larger audience that includes Canadians. Most customers do not watch four to five hours of Canadian content every night. Customers would most likely subscribe to other channels in the pick-and-pay scenario.

2. Pick-and-pay

Canadians would be able to purchase channels on an individual basis.

Based on an analysis from Nielsen, the number of channels that consumers watch consistently stays at around 17. Based on Rogers Communications Inc.’s (TSX: RCI.B)(NYSE: RCI) latest quarterly results, it generated $437 million in television revenue on a base of slightly over two million television subscribers, for an average TV revenue per user of about $70.

Based on this, quick math would show that if Rogers priced each channel individually at $2.65, it would stay revenue-neutral per user ($2.65 x 17 channels + $25 basic package = $70.05). However, some of the 17 channels would probably be consumed as part of the basic package. Thus, Rogers should price each channel higher than $2.65.

How much higher?

There should to be a way to differentiate between premium demand channels like those for sports and less mainstream specialty channels, such as the Food Network. Thus, it would not surprise me if Rogers were to split pick-and-pay options based on a range, for example, between $3.50 for the less in-demand channels and $5.00 for the premium channels — and even higher for some multicultural channels.

For example, say the average Canadian purchases a basic package at $25 and decides to pick 10 additional channels at a mix of $4.25 per channel; the final bill would be $67.50. All of a sudden, pick-and-pay looks acceptable for telecom companies as it’s close to the original $70 target. In addition, there may be the added benefit that fewer TV customers would cancel.

3. Build your own package

Canadians would be able to build their own packages made up of channels of their choosing.

In 2011, Rogers tested such packages in London, Ontario. It started with a “digital starter pack” and allowed customers to add packages of additional channels starting at bundles of 15, 20, and 30 channels. It then tried to upsell customers with additional theme and premium packs such as a “movies pack” for $26.34, which included TMN, HBO, MPIX, U.S Superstations, and Feature Guide Magazine.

For example, if a customer picked a digital starter pack at $20.29 per month, plus 20 channels at $28.41 per month, and added the movies pack for $26.34 per month, the total would have been about $75.

Investors may expect Rogers and other TV providers to price build-your-own packages profitably. While consumers may gain more choice in terms of selecting their own personal TV packages, Rogers already has enough data to price each bundle perfectly so that it averages out to around $70.

Ultimately, as the CRTC changes the rules on content delivery, telecommunications companies will reinvent themselves by being innovative with their business models. Investors should not worry.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Patrick Li has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Redwood trees stretch up to the sunlight.
Dividend Stocks

2 TSX Growth Stocks Set Up for Outsized Gains in 2024

Considering the growth prospects that these two TSX stocks offer, I would keep a very close eye on them as…

Read more »

movies, theatre, popcorn

3 Things You Need to Know if You Own CGX Stock Today

Cineplex stock remains in the doghouse, trading at 2.6 times earnings, but there are clear signs of an upcoming rebound.

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

3 Strong Dividend Stocks I’d Add to My Portfolio Right Now

Given their solid underlying businesses, stable cash flows, and high yields, these three dividend stocks are an excellent addition to…

Read more »

Bank Stocks

1 Dividend Stock Down 20% to Buy Right Now

This dividend stock provides investors with more growth towards all-time highs, as well as a superior dividend yield over 6%.

Read more »

ETF chart stocks
Dividend Stocks

Got $500 to Invest in Stocks? Put It in This Index Fund

This ETF is one of the best options for those with a bit of cash, who don't want to worry…

Read more »

Tech Stocks

Nvidia Stock Is Making History: Will It Make New Investors Any Money?

Nvidia stock (NASDAQ:NVDA) continues to surge past all-time highs, with shares up 265% in the last year alone! But can…

Read more »

data analyze research
Stocks for Beginners

3 Reasons to Buy Dollarama Stock Like There’s No Tomorrow

Dollarama (TSX:DOL) stock has seen massive growth this last year, but more could be on the way -- not just…

Read more »

warning or alert
Dividend Stocks

Help! How Do I Get Rid of My Stock Duds?

Stock duds can prevent you from making really big returns and using that cash to fund future investments. How do…

Read more »