Which Should You Buy: Canadian National Railway Company or Canadian Pacific Railway Limited?

Both Canadian National Railway Company (TSX:CNR)(NYSE:CNI) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX:CP)(NYSE:CP) are great companies. Which should you add to your portfolio?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

If you’re looking for great companies to own in Canada, you may struggle. For all its blessings, Canada’s largest companies tend to be very cyclical and risky. Much of our country’s major stock market index is in financial services, energy, or materials — all sectors where things can go wrong in a hurry.

However, the rails are one area where you can find two top-quality companies: Canadian National Railway Company (TSX: CNR)(NYSE: CNI) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX: CP)(NYSE: CP). These firms face limited competition and enjoy overwhelmingly high barriers to entry.

Which one is better for your portfolio?

The case for Canadian National

There’s a strong case to be made for Canadian National. First of all, it has easily the best track record (no pun intended) of any rail company in North America. Its expenses as a percentage of revenue are the lowest in the industry, at an average of only 63.3% over the past three years.

Better yet, it arguably has the best track network in the industry, which spans across Canada and down to the United States Gulf Coast. In fact, it is the only railway with a track network that reaches all three coasts. Furthermore, thanks to its acquisition of EJ&E Railway in early 2009, the company is able to sidestep the congested Chicago area.

This track network is especially helpful when shipping crude by rail. Because tank cars remain in short supply, energy companies want to use them as efficiently as possible — and nothing can be more efficient than hiring one railway to take tank cars to any coast without any need for switching to another carrier. Also, the ability to sidestep Chicago is a big bonus. Thus, the rail company is very well positioned to take market share in this market.

The only knock on Canadian National is its price, which trades at over 22 times earnings. However, for such a quality company, that may not be too expensive.

The case for Canadian Pacific

Canadian Pacific’s history is a much different story. For years, this railroad was the industry’s worst performer by practically any measure. Expenses were stuck above 80% of revenue. Then, activist investor Bill Ackman stepped in, buying a big stake in the company and then leading a revolt against its board. The most significant result was a new CEO, Hunter Harrison. Mr. Harrison had been instrumental in leading Canadian National to prominence, and was now set to do the same at Canadian Pacific.

Mr. Harrison has dramatically reduced costs at the railway thus far, making it much more efficient. Last year, the expense ratio dropped 7.1 percentage points to 69.9%, a record for the company.

At this point, an investment in Canadian Pacific is really a bet on Mr. Harrison’s continued success at the company. If he can reduce expenses down to its rival’s levels, that would help boost earnings even more — and a bet on Mr. Harrison is usually a winning one.

The verdict

There is a major problem with an investment in Canadian Pacific: the stock price. At $217 per share, it trades at over 30 times earnings. This stock price is well above Mr. Ackman’s initial projections, and he has been selling down his stake.

Thus, at this point, Canadian National is the better option. It has a more consistent history, a better network, and a cheaper stock price.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Canadian National Railway. The Motley Fool owns shares of Canadian National Railway. Canadian National Railway is a recommendation of Stock Advisor Canada.

More on Investing

rail train
Stocks for Beginners

CP Stock: 1 Key Catalyst Investors Should Watch

After a positive surprise in the last quarter, CP stock (TSX:CP) recently made a change that should have investors excited…

Read more »

Payday ringed on a calendar
Dividend Stocks

Cash Kings: 3 TSX Stocks That Pay Monthly

These stocks are rewarding shareholders with regular monthly dividends and high yields, making them compelling investments for monthly cash.

Read more »

grow dividends
Tech Stocks

Celestica Stock Is up 62% in 2024 Alone, and an Earnings Pop Could Bring Even More

Celestica (TSX:CLS) stock is up an incredible 280% in the last year. But more could be coming when the stock…

Read more »

Airport and plane
Stocks for Beginners

Is Air Canada Stock a Good Buy in April 2024?

Despite rallying by over 20% in the last six months, Air Canada stock could be a great buy for the…

Read more »

Businessman holding AI cloud
Tech Stocks

Stealth AI: 1 Unexpected Stock to Win With Artificial Intelligence

Thomson Reuters (TSX:TRI) stock isn't widely-known for its generative AI prowess, but don't count it out quite yet.

Read more »

Shopping and e-commerce
Tech Stocks

Missed Out on Nvidia? My Best AI Stock to Buy and Hold

Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) stock isn't the only wonderful growth stock to hold for the next 10 years and beyond.

Read more »

Human Hand Placing A Coin On Increasing Coin Stacks In Front Of House
Dividend Stocks

Up 13%, Killam REIT Looks Like It Has More Room to Run

Killam REIT (TSX:KMP.UN) has seen shares climb 13% since market bottom, but come down recently after 2023 earnings.

Read more »

crypto, chart, stocks
Energy Stocks

If You Had Invested $10,000 in Enbridge Stock in 2018, This Is How Much You Would Have Today

Enbridge's big dividend yield isn't free money. Here's why.

Read more »