Suncor Energy Inc. Just Spent $105 Million on a Dry Hole

Suncor Energy Inc.’s (TSX:SU)(NYSE:SU) non-commercial exploration well reminds investors of the risks of offshore drilling.

The Motley Fool

Suncor Energy Inc. (TSX: SU)(NYSE: SU) is the clear leader in the oil sands with a commanding position in that critical energy-producing region. However, the company is also looking to expand its horizons beyond the oil sands via investments to bolster its offshore oil production. Unfortunately, offshore investments don’t always pay off. That was certainly the case of its latest venture after Suncor announced that the first exploratory well at its Shelburne Basin joint venture came up dry.

Drilling into the Shelburne Basin

In 2012 and 2013, global energy giant Royal Dutch Shell plc (ADR) (NYSE:RDS.A)(NYSE:RDS.B) acquired six exploration licenses about 300 km offshore Nova Scotia for $918 million, giving it the right to explore for oil and gas over the next six years. The company thought there might be oil in the region because of the gas production already coming from the shallower waters of Nova Scotia. That said, while the Shelburne Basin is prospective for oil, it is classified as risky because these really are uncharted waters for the industry.

To mitigate some of that risk, Shell brought on Suncor Energy and leading American independent oil company ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) as partners just before prices collapsed in 2014. Dubbed the Deepwater Shelburne Basin Venture Exploration Program, Shell retained a 50% stake with Suncor Energy and ConocoPhillips acquiring 20% and 30% stakes, respectively.

Despite the subsequent worldwide slump in oil prices, the partners agreed to move forward with two exploration wells in hopes of finding oil. Unfortunately, the partners recently completed the first exploration well and deemed it to be non-commercial. While they still hold out hope that the other well will encounter viable hydrocarbons, the odds of success certainly decreased after the first well came up dry.

Wading into deeper risks

Due to the differences in geology, oil sands are less risky to develop than offshore locations. That is largely because the oil is much closer to the surface and is in fairly contagious deposits. It is because of those differences that offshore exploration is a much riskier; the industry’s success rate is roughly 50%.

ConocoPhillips has experienced the risks of deepwater exploration first hand in recent years. In April 2015, the company announced that an exploration well in Angola and one in the Gulf of Mexico were plugged and abandoned due to the lack of commercial hydrocarbons, costing the company US$142 million. Meanwhile, last quarter the company recorded two more dry hole impairments for prospects in the Gulf of Mexico. With its dry holes adding up, ConocoPhillips opted to exit deepwater exploration altogether.

That is the opposite approach of Suncor Energy, which recently said that it wanted to start diversifying away from the oil sands after wildfires impacted production this spring. As a result, it is turning more of its attention toward offshore projects both in the Canadian Atlantic and the North Sea, recently spending $50 million for a stake in the Rosebank project in the North Sea.

While that project is less risky because it is a confirmed discovery, Suncor Energy remains interested in acquiring additional offshore exploration licenses. Those explorations licenses are riskier investments and could mean that there will be a lot more dry holes in Suncor’s future.

Investor takeaway

Suncor Energy wants to make sure it has more than enough oil resources to keep its production flowing and growing for decades to come. That requires the company to take risks, which don’t always pay off. The hope, however, is that enough do pay off to more than offset the dry holes it drills along the way.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo owns shares of ConocoPhillips.

More on Energy Stocks

oil pumps at sunset
Energy Stocks

How a $25,000 TFSA Could Fund Your Retirement

Canadians can turn to the TFSA to help provide a meaningful income stream in retirement.

Read more »

coins jump into piggy bank
Energy Stocks

Canadian Natural Resources vs. Enbridge: The Better Dividend Stock to Buy Today

Both CNQ and ENB have impressive payout records, consistently paying and increasing their dividends for decades.

Read more »

person with spyglass looks at ocean horizon
Energy Stocks

TFSA Passive Income: 2 Anchor Stocks to Own for Decades

These energy industry giants have long track records of dividend growth.

Read more »

middle-aged couple work together on laptop
Dividend Stocks

Dividend Income Outside a TFSA? The OAS Math I’d Check Before Buying More

A $1,000 dividend can add $1,380 to the income used to calculate your Old Age Security recovery tax.

Read more »

Senior uses a laptop computer
Energy Stocks

Enbridge vs. TC Energy: Which Pipeline Stock Fits a Retirement Portfolio?

Enbridge gives me the bigger cheque today. TC Energy makes a case for investors who want more exposure to growing…

Read more »

financial chart graphs and oil pumps on a field
Energy Stocks

Invest $10,000 in This Dividend Stock for $660 in Annual Passive Income

Freehold Royalties offers an attractive 6.6% dividend yield, backed by stronger cash flow, declining debt, and promising growth opportunities.

Read more »

electrical cord plugs into wall socket for more energy
Energy Stocks

What $10,000 in Fortis Could Pay Now After Years of Dividend Growth

A $10,000 Fortis purchase could start with about $311 in annual dividends. Future raises are where the numbers get more…

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Forget GICs: This Dividend Stock Pays Solid Income

Why settle for fixed GIC returns? This Canadian dividend stock offers an attractive 5.7% yield, solid earnings growth, and promising…

Read more »