Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl Inc. Just Sold Over US$2 Billion in Assets: What Now?

Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl Inc. (TSX:VRX)(NYSE:VRX) is finally selling assets, but the proceeds don’t cover enough of the mountain of debt it carries.

| More on:

Joe Papa said his plan was to sell non-core assets, and sell non-core assets he has. According to ReutersValeant Pharmaceuticals Intl Inc. (TSX:VRX)(NYSE:VRX) has sold US$2.12 billion worth of assets in its bid to pay down its gigantic +US$30 billion debt. And looking at the details of the acquisition, the deals appear to be quite lucrative.

The first sale is for its Dendreon cancer business, which it sold to China’s Sanpower Group Co Ltd. for US$819.9 million. This deal might not seem all that significant, except for the fact that it bought it out of bankruptcy in 2015 for roughly US$300 million. Losing revenue always hurts a little, but being able to more than double your money in two years is significant, especially when it comes to paying down debt.

The other sale is three skincare brands that it is selling to L’Oreal, a French cosmetics group. All told, it sold CeraVe, AcneFree, and Ambi for roughly US$1.3 billion in cash. Again, this deal was lucrative because the three brands only generated about US$168 million in yearly revenue, so Valeant definitely is the winner in this deal.

While skincare is a rapidly expanding business, paying down debt is more important. Besides, Valeant’s not too upset about this. As Reuters wrote, “Valeant said its lotion for plaque psoriases, IDP-118 … was more effective and reduced irritation in patients in a key study.” So, it sold lotions that might not have been as effective for eight times its yearly revenue.

The company is also reported to have made 95 different price increases across more than 50 products, which is quite daring considering how much scrutiny the company has been under due to the controversies of the past year and a half.

According to Wells Fargo analyst David Maris, “In our opinion, this is an example of Valeant’s continued reliance on price as a means of growth and may also signal that Valeant’s prescription volumes continue to remain challenged.” In other words, the business might have no choice but to increase prices, even if it means that it draws the ire of regulators.

Nevertheless, Valeant is making moves, and as investors, we have to decide if we want to buy the stock. My stance is rather simple.

When management is incentivized to make a company a success, I’m more inclined to like the company. And Valeant has incentivized Joe Papa to make the company a success. If the stock returns to US$150 a share, he receives US$100 million in performance-based stock units. And if he can get it back to US$270, he’ll receive US$500 million in performance-based stock units. Obviously, he wants to succeed, which will make shareholders succeed.

But the negative thing is that Valeant is still carrying a tonne of debt. While the proceeds from these sales will help it pay off some of its debt, the reality is, the company is still carrying far too much. If the company can’t find buyers for its other non-core assets, it could be in trouble.

However, an analyst from Mizuho Security USA believes that Valeant will look to sell its dental business, which will help pay down the debt. And based on how strong these deals were for the company, perhaps it has more negotiating power than we originally thought.

I’m still not a buyer of Valeant, but now that it is executing its strategy to sell its non-core assets, it has certainly gained a little more intrigue from me. But I remain on the sidelines and will stay there until it announces a few more deals.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Jacob Donnelly has no position in any stocks mentioned. Tom Gardner owns shares of Valeant Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool owns shares of Valeant Pharmaceuticals.

More on Investing

worry concern
Investing

Is it Safe to Own U.S. Stocks These Days?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) is a robust value bet, even after soaring 11% on the back of its quantum computing chip news.

Read more »

A worker drinks out of a mug in an office.
Dividend Stocks

A Dividend Giant I’d Buy Over BCE Stock Right Now

The largest telecom company in Canada is brutally discounted, and the dividend yield is naturally up, but it's too risky…

Read more »

a man celebrates his good fortune with a disco ball and confetti
Dividend Stocks

Get Ready to Invest $7,000 in This Dividend Stock for New Year Passive Income

This is the year you get ahead, and maxing out your TFSA contribution is the best way to start.

Read more »

ways to boost income
Dividend Stocks

Buy 2,653 Shares of This Top Dividend Stock for $10K in Annual Passive Income

Enbridge is a blue-chip TSX dividend stock that offers shareholders a forward yield of 6%. Is it still a good…

Read more »

tsx today
Stock Market

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Friday, December 13

Down 1.1% week to date, the TSX Composite Index seems on track to end its five-week winning streak.

Read more »

ETF stands for Exchange Traded Fund
Bank Stocks

A Canadian Bank ETF I’d Buy With $1,000 and Hold Forever

This unique Hamilton ETF gives you 1.25x leveraged exposure to Canada's Big Six bank stocks.

Read more »

a person looks out a window into a cityscape
Dividend Stocks

1 Marvellous Canadian Dividend Stock Down 11% to Buy and Hold Immediately

Buying up this dividend stock while it's down isn't just a smart move, it could make you even more passive…

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing the Registered Retirement Savings Plan
Dividend Stocks

CPP at 70: Is it Enough if Invested in an RRSP?

Even if you wait to take out CPP at 70, it's simply not going to cut it during retirement. Which…

Read more »