Is Hudson’s Bay Co. Spread Too Thin? Not by a Long Shot

Hudson’s Bay Co. (TSX:HBC) announced a big fourth-quarter loss, prompting some to speculate the company is trying to do too much at one time. Here’s why that’s nonsense.

The problem with the “old” Hudson’s Bay Co. (TSX:HBC) prior to Executive Chairman Richard Baker taking control in 2008 was that it was wildly out of touch with the modern shopper, refusing to change with the times. Worse still, its stores looked like hell.

Baker entered, strong retail executives like Bonnie Brooks and current CEO Jerry Storch got hired, billions were spent reviving the stores, which lie upon valuable real estate, and yet when the company delivered a $152 million net loss in Q4 2016 — not surprising given the current retail environment — retail experts didn’t hesitate to question Baker’s methods.

“Department stores are one of the softest segments in retail right now,” retail consultant Bruce Winder told The Financial Post. “(HBC) has a lot on the go and as they have been buying and buying, I don’t know if they have fully optimized any of the divisions they acquired.”

Hey, I get where Winder’s coming from, but the reality in retail, or any business, for that matter, is that you’re never fully optimized; there’s always room for improvement. It’s obvious to anyone, including Baker, that HBC isn’t firing on all cylinders, but if you look at its business more closely, you’ll see that it’s actually doing relatively well despite the market conditions and industry competitiveness.

Here are some of the positives I see from its Q4 2016 and full-year report:

  • Its department store group, which includes Hudson’s Bay, Lord & Taylor, and Home Outfitters, saw comparable sales increase 0.6% on a constant-currency basis.
  • Saks Fifth Avenue had a 0.1% increase in comparable sales, better than the full-price stores at both Nordstrom and Neiman Marcus, the latter of which HBC is rumoured to be interested in.
  • Its e-commerce revenues increased by 52.8% in the fourth quarter with comparable sales up 13.3% on a constant currency basis.
  • Its gross profit margin improved 50 basis points to 40.2%; its gross margin for the year was 41.3% — 190 basis points higher than Macy’s, another potential target for Baker and company.
  • The company had gross capital expenditures of $1.1 billion in fiscal 2016 — 77.9% higher than a year earlier with a big chunk of the increase in merchandising, where it spent $786 million in 2016; that’s double what it spent in 2015. It expects its total capital investments in 2017 to be around the same amount with 80% of it allocated for growth initiatives in Europe.
  • It expects net capital expenditures in 2017 to be between $450 million and $550 million, which means landlord incentives are expected to be higher in the coming year — a huge plus.
  • The flagship Lord & Taylor store in New York is valued at US$655 million — $255 million higher than the US$400 million mortgage it took out in the second quarter.
  • It launched its state-of-the-art robotic fulfillment centre in November — a $60 million investment as part of its all-channel business strategy.

The biggest plus from its report and conference call was undoubtedly Richard Baker’s hint that its real estate monetization plans are ready to go ahead. He also admitted that it might have been prudent, in hindsight, to have done so earlier in 2016.

So, in fiscal 2017, HBC is going to start monetizing more of its real estate, continue to improve the customer experience on the store floor through ongoing renovations, continue to expand and improve HBC Europe, and fix whatever is wrong with its off-price business.

Oh, I almost forgot. It will continue to scour the globe for accretive acquisitions.

“We look to do deals that are accretive for our shareholders,” Baker said in HBCs conference call. “In no way would we do an acquisition that affected our debt ratios and impacted our existing business in a material way.”

Is that too much?

Maybe for an ordinary person, but Baker has proven he ain’t that. it’s full-steam ahead for the HBC Express.

 

Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

2 Canadian Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next 5 Years

These two Canadian stocks are compelling choices to buy and hold for the next five years supported by solid business…

Read more »

ETF stands for Exchange Traded Fund
Dividend Stocks

3 Canadian ETFs I’d Snap Up Right Now for My TFSA

These three high-quality Canadian ETFs are perfect for TFSAs, offering instant diversification to top stocks from around the world.

Read more »

how to save money
Dividend Stocks

The Best Stocks to Buy With $10,000 Right Now

Add these two TSX stocks to your self-directed investment portfolio if you’re seeking long-term buying opportunities in the current climate.

Read more »

coins jump into piggy bank
Dividend Stocks

How to Convert $25,000 in TFSA Savings Into Reliable Cash Flow

With $25,000 invested into Fortis (TSX:FTS) stock, you can get some cash flow in your TFSA.

Read more »

rising arrow with flames
Investing

2 Superb Canadian Stocks Set to Surge Into 2026

The durable demand for their products and services, and solid execution make them superb stocks to buy and hold.

Read more »

dividends can compound over time
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Stocks to Lock In Now for Decades of Passive Income

These two Canadian dividend stocks are both defensive and generate tons of cash flow, making them ideal for passive-income seekers.

Read more »

man looks surprised at investment growth
Dividend Stocks

If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be it

Brookfield (TSX:BN) is a very high-quality stock.

Read more »

ETF is short for exchange traded fund, a popular investment choice for Canadians
Dividend Stocks

The ETFs That Canadians Are Sleeping On (But Shouldn’t Be) Right Now

These three high-quality Canadian ETFs are perfect for investors in 2026, especially with increasing uncertainty and volatility in markets.

Read more »