Compensation consultant Gallagher McDowell Associates released its 2016 Canadian Chief Executive Officer Compensation report April 18; it examines the total compensation of the CEOs of Canada’s five largest banks. To no one’s surprise, compensation is heading higher. Shareholders of all five of these banks should be extremely concerned about this trend given all the high-pressure sales tactics the banks employ — Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD)(NYSE:TD) is at the top of the list — to take as much of our hard-earned wages as is humanly possible. In recent years, corporate governance experts have touted say-on-pay (SOP) initiatives as the road to…
To keep reading, enter your email address or login below.
Compensation consultant Gallagher McDowell Associates released its 2016 Canadian Chief Executive Officer Compensation report April 18; it examines the total compensation of the CEOs of Canada’s five largest banks.
To no one’s surprise, compensation is heading higher.
Shareholders of all five of these banks should be extremely concerned about this trend given all the high-pressure sales tactics the banks employ — Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD)(NYSE:TD) is at the top of the list — to take as much of our hard-earned wages as is humanly possible.
In recent years, corporate governance experts have touted say-on-pay (SOP) initiatives as the road to the promised land when it comes to curbing excessive executive compensation. A new report from U.S. compensation expert Pay Governance LLC suggests these efforts aren’t working.
“We found that CEO pay continued to increase after SOP — possibly at a slower rate than historical CEO pay increases — and that CEO pay distribution was narrower after SOP than it was before shareholder voting on executive compensation was implemented,” stated the opening paragraph of Pay Governance’s conclusion to its report, “Did Say-on-Pay Reduce and/or “Compress” CEO Pay?”
Translation: SOP votes became part of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2011. Since then, CEO pay has continued to increase in the following five years.
Interestingly, since SOP votes came to exist, CEOs at the highest-paying S&P 500 companies have seen very little in the way of pay increases, while those in the lowest-paying companies have seen significant increases as they try to compete for talented CEOs.
At least, that’s the theory.
Pay Governance found that total shareholder returns were the same for companies that haven’t increased CEO pay since 2011 as the businesses that have upped the pay of their top executives.
So, if the numbers suggest higher pay does little to influence total shareholder returns, why do companies on both sides of the border continue to do it? They do it because to admit this reality would hinder the revenue growth of executive recruitment firms and all those that benefit from higher compensation.
You’ve got to keep feeding the beast.
The most shocking part of Gallagher McDowell Associates’s report on bank CEO compensation can be found on page eight, in which it highlight’s the total financial stakes of the five CEOs.
Included in the figures are three things: (a) the value of the common shares held by each CEO; (b) the value of the unrealized equity compensation; and (c) the actuarial value of their accrued pension benefits.
Total CEO financial stakes as of October 31, 2016
|Company||Total Value at Stake|
|Bank of Montreal
|Bank of Nova Scotia
|Royal Bank of Canada
|Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Source: McDowell Associates report, page eight, table seven
These five CEOs have a combined $320 million at stake through the end of fiscal 2016, which apparently won’t have any effect on how each of their respective bank stocks performs in the next few years.
Here’s how CEOs should be paid
My grandfather was president of the Famous Players theatre chain — now owned by Cineplex — in the 1960s. I have his 1959 compensation report performed by Price Waterhouse on behalf of Famous Players. At the time of that report, he was vice president and controller of the business.
His compensation consisted of two things:
1. $400-per-week salary.
2. 2.5% of the company’s first $250,000 in adjusted earnings and 1.66% of everything above $250,000.
In 1959, he received $19,550 in salary and $24,168.76 in additional compensation based on a percentage of adjusted earnings. Also, he was reimbursed for expenses incurred on behalf of the company.
That’s it; that’s all.
If he wanted to own Famous Players stock, he had to buy it on the open market like every other investor. Millions of dollars of stock options weren’t dangled in front of him like a giant carrot, yet he managed to grow the bottom line just the same — and was grateful for the additional compensation as a result.
Today, despite having SOP rules in place, CEOs of large companies, including the banks, continue to reap rewards most of their customers can only hope for.
It’s just plain wrong.
Iain Butler, Lead Adviser of Stock Advisor Canada, recommended this little tech darling to thousands of loyal members last March... and those that followed his advice are up 127.7% (they’ve already made 2X their money!).
Not to mention this tiny Eastern Ontario company has already been recommended by both Motley Fool co-founders, David and Tom Gardner, because of its amazing similarity to an “early stage” Amazon.
Find out why Tom Gardner was recently on BNN’s Money Talk raving about this company, and how you can read all about it inside Stock Advisor Canada. Click here to unlock all the details about his Canadian rule breaker!
Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned.