Why a Subscription Model May Be Inevitable for Facebook

One option that could solve a lot of the social media site’s problems: charging users a nominal fee every month.

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn more

Ads are what keep Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) going and what allow users to avoid paying a fee to use the social media site, but there’s always a chance that this could change in the future.

Privacy issues have been rising over the years. Whether they have involved data breaches or users’ personal information, consumers are more aware than ever of what’s at stake online: their data. That data allows advertisers to place ads to users based on their interests and any other information Facebook may have obtained from a user. Providing that information to advertisers becomes an issue, especially if it’s not adequately safeguarded. It’s a concern that regulators have been paying attention to.

Fines are starting to mount

In July, Facebook was fined $5 billion by the FTC for the Cambridge Analytica scandal. And Alphabet‘s (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google faces a more modest punishment of $170 million for YouTube’s attempts at marketing to children.

However, there could be more to come for the popular search engine. According to Forbes, some allegations suggest Google is in violation of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) laws in the European Union, which could cost the company as much as $5.4 billion. Tech companies as a whole are drawing the attention of regulators due to privacy and whether it’s Google or Facebook, the fines could become more severe in order to ensure that companies are taking the issues seriously.

Facebook’s fine and Google’s unconfirmed fine are sure to draw the attention of investors and could lead to pressure for the companies to ensure that user information is more adequately protected. Although Facebook’s $22 billion in 2018 profit easily handles the fine, $5 billion is large enough to put a dent in annual profitability.

Why a pay model makes so much sense

Facebook’s operating expenses have been rising more rapidly in recent years. Costs totaling $30.9 billion in fiscal 2018 were a 51% increase from the prior year’s operating expenses of $20.5 billion. And those numbers were up 34% from 2016. Costs have been rising and that’s likely to continue happening. In the company’s most recent earnings results, it said that it had “agreed to implement a comprehensive expansion of our privacy program, including substantial management and board of directors oversight, stringent operational requirements and reporting obligations, and a process to regularly certify our compliance with the privacy program to the FTC.” However, no specific dollar amount was provided as to the potential cost of all those governance changes.

Rising costs are going to be make things more challenging for the company’s bottom line as well, especially since its high growth rate has started to slide in recent years. Revenues of $55.8 billion in 2018 were up 37%, which is well shy of 2017’s growth rate of 47% or the 54% rise in sales that 2016 saw. It’s likely that the company won’t be able to combat rising costs by relying on a high growth rate, and that’s why it’s going to have to take the issues surrounding privacy more seriously. Many advertisers have been upset with the company’s practices and although it’s unclear how many have actually left, Facebook does admit that some have pushed ‘pause.’

Depending less on ad revenue and more on subscription fees from users could not only reduce Facebook’s costs (by decreasing the need to monitor ads) but also grow its sales. With 1.59 billion active users on its website, a price of $3 per month would produce more than $57 billion in sales for a year, which is more than the company made in 2018. That’s much less than the cost of a Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) subscription, and in turn, users could enjoy an ad-free Facebook experience and not have to worry about whether they’re seeing fake ads. Even a hybrid approach that allows some users to pay for ad-free accounts could help minimize the site’s dependence on ads and its need to utilize user data.

Takeaway for investors

Facebook may be in a bit of trouble when it comes to privacy issues, but the company has some flexibility. Whether for movies, video games, news sites, or even Porsches, people have shown a willingness to pay recurring subscription fees. While a subscription model might not be on the horizon today, it’s certainly an option for the tech company to explore should profits start to get squeezed. There are many ways the company can grow its revenues, and that includes offering users the option to pay to not see ads. While a subscription won’t appeal to all of its users, even if some are willing to pay a fee for an ad-free experience, that will help lessen the company’s reliance on advertisers and help strengthen its business by having another segment that can contribute to its top line.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Facebook, and Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

More on Tech Stocks

clock time
Tech Stocks

Now’s the Time to Load Up the TFSA With These 2 Top TSX Stocks

Here are two top TSX stocks that long-term growth investors may not want to give up on, especially at these…

Read more »

shopping online, e-commerce
Tech Stocks

Shopify (TSX:SHOP) Stock Recovers 30% From its 3-Year Lows: Should You Buy?

Shopify stock: Should you buy the dip or wait for more weakness?

Read more »

Businessman holding tablet and showing a growing virtual hologram of statistics, graph and chart with arrow up on dark background. Stock market. Business growth, planning and strategy concept
Tech Stocks

What Market Correction? 2 High-Growth Tech Stocks That Are on the Rise

I don’t think it will be long before these two Canadian tech stocks are back to delivering market-crushing returns.

Read more »

grow dividends
Tech Stocks

Why Kinaxis (TSX:KXS) Stock Jumped 14% Last Week

Kinaxis Inc. (TSX:KXS) stock popped over the past week after adding yet another big company to its impressive stable.

Read more »

potted green plant grows up in arrow shape
Tech Stocks

TFSA Investors: Double Your Investments With These 3 Top Growth Stocks

Despite the volatility, I am bullish on these three stocks, given their solid growth potential.

Read more »

Arrow descending on a graph
Tech Stocks

2 Industries That Saw the Worst Decline Last Month

The TSX has been declining at a sharp angle since the beginning of June. And two industries (crypto and cannabis)…

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: Turn $1,000 Into $10,000 in 10 Years

10-fold growth within a decade is rare but not unheard of. You can capture this growth either by predicting a…

Read more »

Growth from coins
Tech Stocks

Got $1,000? Buy These 3 Under-$20 Growth Stocks to Earn Higher Returns

These under-$20 growth stocks can deliver solid returns in the long run.

Read more »