Air Canada (TSX:AC): Are the Sky-High Rewards Worth the Risk?

Air Canada (TSX:AC) could be a potential multi-bagger in a bull-case scenario, but are the downside risks too high for most to bear amid this crisis?

| More on:

Air Canada (TSX:AC) and the broader airline industry are navigating through arguably the worst environment they’ve ever been in. While Air Canada may be a far more resilient company than it was prior to the 2007-08 Financial Crisis, it sure doesn’t feel like it given that the airlines are at ground zero of this coronavirus crisis.

Airline stocks: A speculative bet that may be worth making

If the cause of this recession was anything other than a pandemic, I’m sure Air Canada would have pulled through on its own. The business of the airlines is now far more economical this time around, and Air Canada has done an exceptional job of improving upon its company-specific fundamentals.

Unfortunately, none of this progress matters in the coronavirus era. Government-mandated travel restrictions put the airlines at the mercy of exogenous events, and for investors like Warren Buffett, the uncertainties that accompany an airline investment are far too high.

Heck, you could argue that the coronavirus-related uncertainties have turned the airlines from a sound, profitable investment into a complete speculation.

For long-term investors seeking to nab stocks at discounts to their intrinsic value, the airlines are becoming unworthy bets, as it’s virtually impossible to gauge their intrinsic value with the headwinds that lie ahead. The true value of the airlines ultimately depends on what’s going to happen next with this horrific pandemic and the vaccine timeline.

So, how does one justify an investment in Air Canada?

Acknowledge the uncertainties the fact that you’ll be speculating and not investing in what’s shaping up to be an all-or-nothing type of bet. Until a working vaccine is created, it’s highly unlikely that the passenger volumes will make an abrupt return to pre-pandemic levels, even if travel restrictions are lifted as the risk of contracting COVID-19 is reduced.

Boeing CEO David Calhoun noted that he sees it taking two or three years for air travel to recover and that the odds of a U.S. airline going under in 2020 are quite high. If a COVID-19 vaccine takes far longer than anyone on the Street is expecting, though, the road to recovery for the airline industry could be even longer.

Who knows? It could take the airlines a full decade to turn to their 2019 heights if a worst-case scenario ends up unfolding, and the pandemic lasts as long, if not longer, than the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic. In such a scenario, investors could stand to lose a majority of their investment with a bet on Air Canada, even though shares have already been cut in half twice.

Foolish takeaway on the risk/reward involved with Air Canada

For the airlines that do survive this coronavirus typhoon, the returns could be astronomical for shareholders willing to hang in there.

If you’re a young investor who’s okay with an “all-or-nothing” type bet, Air Canada, I believe, is a speculation well worth taking. It stands out as the best bet in the space thanks to its favourable liquidity position, which makes it among the best positioned to survive this crisis, as cash reserves look to dry up.

It’s worth noting, however, that such a superior relative degree of financial flexibility can only go so far. As such, investors shouldn’t seek to bet the farm and should look to scale into a position in Air Canada stock only with disposable income they’re willing to lose.

“Air Canada raised $1 billion in debt in March and $1.6 billion in April while cutting capacity and doing everything in its power to conserve cash amid this liquidity crunch.” I wrote in a prior piece. “The Canadian airline may have a pretty decent balance sheet on a relative basis, but that’s still not saying much, as Air Canada looks akin to the best player on a sports team that stinks.”

Fool contributor Joey Frenette has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Stocks for Beginners

Concept of multiple streams of income
Dividend Stocks

How to Use Your TFSA to Double Your Annual Contribution

Find out how a TFSA offers unlimited wealth generation and investment income potential even when contributions are limited.

Read more »

shopper buys items in bulk
Stocks for Beginners

A Perfect TFSA Stock: A 6.9% Yield With Constant Paycheques

This TFSA stock offers a 6.9% yield, monthly payouts, and exposure to grocery-anchored real estate.

Read more »

drinker sniffs wine in a glass
Dividend Stocks

How Much Does a Typical 45-Year-Old Alberta Resident Have Saved in a TFSA?

A “small” TFSA at 45 is more normal than most Canadians think, and Manulife can help turn steady contributions into…

Read more »

middle-aged couple work together on laptop
Retirement

What the Average Canadian TFSA Looks Like at Age 50

See what the average Canadian TFSA at age 50 could look like, and how the right investments can build long-term…

Read more »

resting in a hammock with eyes closed
Stocks for Beginners

5 TSX Stocks to Buy for a Calm, Boring, Winning Portfolio

Learn why boring stocks can be your best investment. Discover how steady companies can enhance your portfolio's performance.

Read more »

the word REIT is an acronym for real estate investment trust
Dividend Stocks

3 Dividend Stocks Yielding X% Canadians Can Own Even When Growth Falls Out of Favour

When growth stocks wobble, Granite, SmartCentres, and BMO offer a simple 4.3% average yield mix built for steadier cash flow.

Read more »

financial chart graphs and oil pumps on a field
Energy Stocks

Create the Perfect June TFSA With a 6.3% Monthly Payout

Freehold Royalties could turn idle TFSA cash into tax-free monthly income, using a royalty model that collects energy cash flow…

Read more »

you're never too young or old to start investing in stocks
Dividend Stocks

Generational Wealth: 2 Canadian Stocks to Get You There

Generational wealth can start with two long-term compounders like Brookfield and Constellation Software that think in decades, not headlines.

Read more »