Why Do Dividend Stocks Drop on Their Ex-Dividend Dates? Should You Even Care?

Get dividends by owning dividend stocks before their ex-dividend dates, but analyze business prospects and stock valuations before buying.

| More on:

Yesterday was Algonquin Power & Utilities’s (TSX:AQN)(NYSE:AQN) latest ex-dividend date. You’ll notice that dividend stocks tend to drop on their ex-dividend date. Indeed, Algonquin stock dipped about 1.2% on the TSX during the early market trading hours. Why is that and should you, as a buyer or seller of a stock, care? First, let me explain the ex-dividend date.

think thought consider

Image source: Getty Images

The ex-dividend date explained

Dividend stocks aim to pay out dividends regularly. The payments are scheduled commonly for every quarter or every month, but dividend payments made once a year or every half a year also exist.

Common stock shares exchange hands on the stock market during days the market is open. Dividend-paying companies set an ex-dividend date for each declared dividend to determine investors that they would pay to. Therefore, you must have bought shares before this date to receive the dividend.

AQN stock dipped about 1.2% in early market trading on March 30, on its latest ex-dividend date, which is roughly the quarterly dividend payment amount. (The dividend stock yields about 4.5%. Divide this yield by four, and you get about 1.1%.) The dividend stock is paying out cold, hard cash, which was a piece of its asset, for the dividend. So, the corresponding stock drop makes sense.

To be clear, if you started a new position of 100 shares in Algonquin stock on January 1, 2022, and bought another 100 shares on March 30, 2022, you would only receive a dividend payment for the first 100 shares for this quarterly dividend.

Should you trade around ex-dividend dates of dividend stocks?

Some new investors try to trade around the ex-dividend dates of dividend stocks. They try to grab the dividend by buying a dividend stock a short period before the ex-dividend date and sell soon after. However, in the grander scheme of things, investors should ignore the stock drop.

Although you could jump around different dividend stocks to aim to buy before their ex-dividend dates to grab their dividends, it would be a lot of work to do so. Importantly, short-term stock volatility is highly unpredictable. It would be a risky strategy to buy and sell stocks quickly, as you could lose money from stock price depreciation. Instead, investors should focus on the prospects of the underlying business and the long-term total-returns potential.

Dividend stocks’ prospects

Ask questions about the dividend stock that you plan to buy. What’s most valuable about dividend stocks is their durable dividend payments. I should add that you need to determine if the stock in question pays a durable dividend that is sustainable and ideally growing.

Only dividends that are declared must be paid. Most dividend stocks declare only the dividend that’s coming up, which means that after declaring the first quarterly dividend of a year, the management of a dividend stock can choose to cease dividend payments for the rest of the year — and after that, for that matter. Most dividend stocks want to maintain their dividends to attract long-term shareholders.

News has been swirling that Algonquin’s growth is slowing, which could lead to its upcoming dividend hike to be slower than in the past. However, that’s not necessarily a reason for shareholders to sell the stock, as utilities like Algonquin are meant for long-term holding to collect dividend payments. Interested investors should focus on buying the stock when it trades at a good valuation.

Allow me to close off with Brian Madden’s commentary on Algonquin stock from last week:

“Algonquin is good for income and growth with a history of dividend growth. There is a need to strengthen the grid in generation, transmission, and distribution so this makes for a good opportunity for the utility companies. There is a real opportunity in utilities in renewable generators of power. An opportunity of the decade. Algonquin is a lower beta company.”

Brian Madden, chief investment officer at First Avenue Investment Counsel

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Fool contributor Kay Ng owns shares of Algonquin.

More on Dividend Stocks

Investor wonders if it's safe to buy stocks now
Dividend Stocks

What’s Going on With goeasy’s Dividend?

Goeasy (TSX:GSY) has suspended its dividend.

Read more »

dividends can compound over time
Dividend Stocks

3 Worry-Free High-Yield Dividend Plays for 2026

These three worry‑free, high‑yield dividend stocks can offer investors a stable recurring income stream backed by reliable performance.

Read more »

Asset Management
Top TSX Stocks

2 Top Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Long Term

Two industry heavyweights with renewed growth stories are the top stocks to buy and hold for the long term.

Read more »

Hourglass and stock price chart
Dividend Stocks

A Deeply Undervalued TSX Stock Down 17.5% Worth Holding Long Term

Beyond the Iran war panic, here's why Magna International (TSX:MG) stock’s 17.5% drop is a 10-year gift for patient investors

Read more »

Utility, wind power
Dividend Stocks

2 Canadian Dividend Giants I’d Buy With Rates on Hold

These top Canadian dividend stocks could be just what your portfolio ordered in this current economic backdrop. Here's why.

Read more »

diversification is an important part of building a stable portfolio
Dividend Stocks

A Top-Performing U.S. Stock That Canadian Investors Really Should Own

NVIDIA (NVDA) is hot, but one other U.S. stock is built to last.

Read more »

man shops in a drugstore
Dividend Stocks

2 Top TSX Stocks to Buy Today With Long-Term Growth in Mind

These two top TSX stocks are some of the best and most reliable long-term growth names that you can buy…

Read more »

people stand in a line to wait at an airport
Dividend Stocks

The Bank of Canada Just Held Rates at 2.25%. These 3 Dividend Stocks Are Built for the Wait.

Dividend investors who had been hoping for a rate cut should now pivot to "what pays me while I wait?"

Read more »