Which Should You Buy: Thomson Reuters Corporation or BlackBerry Ltd?

Thomson Reuters Corporation (TSX:TRI)(NYSE:TRI) and BlackBerry Ltd (TSX:BB)(NASDAQ:BBRY) have some interesting similarities and differences. Which one should you add to your portfolio?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

It may seem like an odd comparison to make. But BlackBerry Ltd (TSX: BB)(NASDAQ: BBRY) and Thomson Reuters Corporation (TSX: TRI)(NYSE: TRI) have much in common.

Back in 2007, both were Canadian technology darlings. Then came the financial crisis, which didn’t help. Botched product releases didn’t help either. Each company had poor corporate cultures (Thomson’s problems with culture came as a result of its merger with Reuters). And competitors have stepped in and stolen market share from both of these companies.

Yet the two firms have one notable difference: their share price performances. Since late June 2008, BlackBerry shares have fallen by more than 90%, while Thomson’s shares have increased by 18%. So what makes the two companies so different? And does this give any hints as to which company you should buy today?

First difference: diversification

Thomson has received a lot of flak for the subpar performance of its Financial & Risk (F&R) division. But F&R consists of many different segments, most of which are performing just fine. And F&R only accounts for about half of revenue overall. Other divisions, such as Legal, are managed separately, and are not affected by any of F&R’s difficulties.

By contrast, BlackBerry’s success pre-2008 was entirely due to one thing: an ability to make and sell smartphones that were preferable to competing products. That advantage has of course disappeared.

So there’s a lesson here: it’s not about how many stocks you own. Because if all your holdings are betting their future on one market, you may not be as diversified as you think.

Formidable competitors

It’s true that Bloomberg is a very strong competitor to Thomson Reuters. But in most F&I markets, Thomson Reuters competes against few others. And in other divisions such as Legal, competition is even weaker.

Compare that to BlackBerry, which competes against the likes of Apple Inc., Google Inc, and Samsung Group. And this is a problem the company continues to face. So even as CEO John Chen talks about the company’s advantages, such as security, who thinks these giants can’t close the gap? This is certainly something you should think about before buying BlackBerry shares.

Subscription vs. new technology

This may be the biggest difference between the two companies. BlackBerry must continually evolve, and come up with ever-improving products, just to maintain its existing sales. Meanwhile, Thomson sells products based on subscriptions, and its products can be a pain to switch away from.

So while BlackBerry was bleeding market share, Thomson shares only eroded by about five percentage points (from 35% to 30%). And this only occurred in its F&R division.

So what should you do?

I know what you’re thinking: hindsight is 20/20, and this does not help anyone decide what to buy today.

But then again, BlackBerry still faces these same headwinds. It is still under pressure to constantly innovate. It is competing with some serious heavyweights. And it is going all-in on this one turnaround strategy. If it doesn’t work out, there could be some (more) painful losses.

Meanwhile, Thomson still enjoys the same benefits that have helped the company persevere. Even better, the company is starting to perform better again. So even though the shares may not seem as cheap, Thomson shares are still a safer bet than BlackBerry’s.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Apple, Google (A shares), and Google (C shares). Tom Gardner owns shares of Google (A shares) and Google (C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A shares), and Google (C shares).

More on Investing

question marks written reminders tickets
Dividend Stocks

Dividend Investors: Is BCE Stock a Buy Now?

BCE now offers a 7.9% dividend yield.

Read more »

A bull outlined against a field
Tech Stocks

Is a Bull Market Here? 4 Reasons to Buy Celestica Stock Like There’s No Tomorrow 

Celestica (TSX:CLS) stock has been a huge winner for investors this year, but there could be even more in the…

Read more »

Retirement plan

1 Retirement Savings Hack That Has Created Many Millionaires

Investors can retirement with $1 million in savings by investing in index funds such as the S&P 500.

Read more »

edit Taxes CRA
Dividend Stocks

CRA Money: 2 More Days to Boost Your Tax Refund!

Dividend stocks like Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD) can be great RRSP holdings.

Read more »

close-up photo of investor Warren Buffett
Stocks for Beginners

The Best Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy With $300 Right Now

These Warren Buffett stocks have long histories of growth, each offering their own reasons for why investors need them today.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Dividend Stocks

3 TSX Dividend Stocks With Yields Above 7% (But Are They Safe?)

These three dividend stocks all have ultra-high yields, making them some of the best to buy if you're looking to…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

3 Energy Stocks Already Worth Your While

TSX energy stocks could shine for much longer. Here's why Canadian Natural Resources (TSX:CNQ), Parex Resources (TSX:PXT), and another oil…

Read more »

Light bulb with jester hat perched on top
Dividend Stocks

3 Canadian Dividend Stocks With Payouts That Are No Joke 

Here are three top Canadian dividend stocks long-term investors would be remiss to ignore, particularly at these current valuations.

Read more »