Cameco Corporation Is Seeing Green as Japan Returns to Nuclear Power

Is a nuclear awakening in the land of the rising sun enough to lure investors back to Cameco Corporation (TSX: CCO)(NYSE: CCJ)?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

It has been four years since the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Japan. Part of the fallout was the shutdown of all 48 of the country’s nuclear reactors, a move that sent shock waves through the uranium sector, with companies such as Cameco Corporation (TSX: CCO)(NYSE: CCJ) seeing an unpredictable drop in demand.

However, things appear to be changing in the island nation, as news has emerged that two nuclear reactors located in the city of Satsuma Sendai would be reopened. Not only does this begin to open the doors to uranium imports, but it also eases fears of the Japanese unloading their reserves back onto the market — a move that would have degraded the already low price of uranium and added to the current oversupply of the radioactive metal.

But is this enough to restore investor confidence in Cameco, or is this just a ray of sunshine during an ongoing storm?

This quarter for Cameco has divided most investors into two camps: those who see a devalued stock with an eventual upside, and those who see too much trouble to touch the stock.

In Q3 2014, Cameco saw a drop in revenue, with only $587 million hitting the books, compared to $597 million in the prior year’s quarter. This is far below the $628 million projected by analysts. Gross profit was almost cut in half, totaling $143 million this quarter, down from $228 million.

Worst of all was a net loss of $146 million ($0.37 per share) compared to net earnings of $211 million ($0.53 per share) in Q3 2013.

Write-downs

A large portion of the net loss has been attributed to a pair of write-downs. The first one is a $184 million charge stemming from Cameco’s part in GE-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment in North Carolina following the news that the project’s majority partner was drastically reducing its funding.

Cameco also suffered a $12 million charge from its investment in GoviEx Uranium Inc. following its debut on the Canadian Securities Exchange. Cameco stated that there was a “significant decline in the fair value of our investment in GoviEx.”

The taxman cometh

Cameco is also embroiled in a tax-avoidance dispute with the Canadian government. The Canadian Revenue Agency believes that — thanks to some clever Swiss accounting — Cameco has circumvented declaring $5.7 billion in taxable income attributable to Canada.

In 1999, Cameco created Cameco Europe in Zug, Switzerland. The new entity was created to be a reseller, but is accused of being nothing more than a rented office at the law firm representing Cameco in Europe. Cameco would sell uranium to Cameco Europe for US$10 per pound. Cameco Europe would in turn sell it to Cameco’s customers.

The issue is that while US$10 per pound was the market rate in 1999, things have changed; in 2007, uranium was priced at US$140 per pound. This difference of $130 per pound became taxable at Switzerland’s 10% tax rate instead of Canada’s 27% tax rate.

While the CRA case is not resolved, Cameco is still required to submit $650 million to the CRA, which equals half of the proposed amount, until the matter is settled. It is believed that Cameco has handed over only about 10% of the charge, and if found guilty, this would cripple the company’s cash flow.

What hope remains?

While 2014 revenues are expected to drop by 5%, Cameco still has over 31 million pounds of U3O8 already contracted between 2014 and 2028. This appears impressive at first, but Cameco is expected to produce 22.8 million pounds this year alone, down from earlier estimates of 23.3 million.

The capital budget has also been slashed from $550 million to $490 million. But on the bright side, the long-awaited Cigar Lake mine is finally producing.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Cameron Conway has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

Beat the TSX With This Cash-Gushing Dividend Stock

Canadian Natural Resources stock is well set up to beat the TSX as it continues to generate strong cash flows…

Read more »

energy industry
Energy Stocks

2 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist Now

These two rallying TSX energy stocks can continue delivering robust returns to investors in the long term.

Read more »

green energy
Energy Stocks

1 Magnificent TSX Dividend Stock Down 37% to Buy and Hold Forever

This dividend stock has fallen significantly from poor results, but zoom in and there are some major improvements happening.

Read more »

oil tank at night
Energy Stocks

3 Energy Stocks Already Worth Your While

Here's why blue-chip TSX energy stocks such as Enbridge should be part of your equity portfolio in 2024.

Read more »

Solar panels and windmills
Energy Stocks

1 Beaten-Down Stock That Could Be the Best Bet in the TSX

This renewable energy stock could be one of the best buys you make this year, as the company starts to…

Read more »

Dice engraved with the words buy and sell
Energy Stocks

Is Enbridge Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?

Here's why Enbridge (TSX:ENB) remains a top dividend stock long-term investors may want to consider, despite current risks.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

If You Had Invested $5,000 in Enbridge Stock in 2018, This Is How Much You Would Have Today

Enbridge's high dividend yield hasn't made up for its dismal total returns.

Read more »

Bad apple with good apples
Energy Stocks

Avoid at All Costs: This Stock Is Portfolio Poison

A mid-cap stock commits to return more to shareholders, but some investors remember the suspension of dividends a few years…

Read more »