Could Canada Build Too Many Oil Pipelines?

TransCanada Corporation’s (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) decision to reapply for permission to build the Keystone XL pipeline could lead to a glut of pipeline capacity in the country if it builds all of the pipelines currently under consideration.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

After years of opposition and uncertainty, Canada appears poised to break ground on two major oil-export pipelines in the very near future. In addition, another long-delayed pipeline project could eventually break ground after TransCanada Corporation (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) recently submitted a Presidential Permit application for approval of its highly controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

That possible project restart comes on top of the company’s continued efforts to construct the Energy East pipeline in Canada. What’s worth noting about these projects is that they could result in Canada building more pipeline capacity than it needs, especially given that oil producers are sanctioning far fewer projects these days due to lower oil prices.

From a shortfall to a glut

Canada currently has enough pipeline takeaway capacity to move more than four million barrels of oil per day. That leaves it with adequate capacity given that the country produces slightly less than four million barrels per day. However, oil sands output will expand sharply over the next few years, reaching roughly 4.5 million barrels per day by 2019 as several major oil sands expansion projects come online.

These developments include Suncor Energy Inc.’s Fort Hills project and additional phases of Canadian Natural Resources Limited‘s Horizon facility, which will combine to add more than 300,000 barrels per day of output by 2019.

As these and other projects ramp up, the output will quickly outstrip the country’s pipeline capacity, which is expected to cause a widening shortfall until 2019 when Kinder Morgan Inc. (NYSE:KMI) and Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB)(NYSE:ENB) expect to complete their recently approved expansion projects.

In Kinder Morgan’s case, its Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion will boost that pipeline’s capacity from 300,000 barrels per day up to 890,000 barrels per day. Meanwhile, Enbridge’s Line 3 Replacement will restore the line to its original capacity of 760,000 barrels per day — up from its current capacity of 390,000 barrels per day.

Once complete, these projects should push Canada’s oil sands takeaway capacity to more than five million barrels per day. Under current projections, the country’s oil output is not expected to exceed that capacity until sometime in the latter half of next decade.

Trying to cut back in line

TransCanada had hoped to capture some of Canada’s growing demand for pipeline capacity by proposing to build the Keystone XL pipeline, which would move Canadian oil to the U.S. Gulf Coast. However, that project faced intense opposition from environmentalists, which eventually led the company to propose the larger Energy East pipeline across Canada.

That decision to focus on another project that didn’t require U.S. approval seemed like a prudent move, especially after former U.S. President Obama officially rejected the proposed 830,000 barrel per day Keystone XL pipeline in 2015.

However, the Trump Administration recently invited TransCanada to reapply for a permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline, which it quickly did. As a result, the company could conceivably construct both Keystone XL and Energy East, which would boost Canada’s oil sands takeaway capacity to more than six million barrels per day by early next decade.

The problem with that scenario is that production from the oil sands is not expected to be much more than 4.5 million barrels per day by the time those projects could go into service. For perspective, that is just enough oil to fill existing capacity plus Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline without needing even to use the capacity of Enbridge’s Line 3 expansion.

In fact, even if Canada’s oil producers accelerate the country’s production later next decade, the country would still only need less than half of TransCanada’s proposed pipeline capacity.

This projection suggests that the company does not need to build both projects anytime soon. As such, it is possible that TransCanada will hold off on its equally controversial Energy East project and instead focus on taking advantage of the opportunity to build Keystone XL before that door shuts again. It could then attempt to move forward with Energy East once producers begin work on a new slate of oil sands growth projects.

Investor takeaway

While Canada clearly needs more oil pipeline capacity, it does not yet need all the projects currently under consideration. That likely means TransCanada will need to shelve one of its projects with Energy East the likely candidate because the company appears to have an easier path to building the Keystone XL at the moment.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo owns shares of Kinder Morgan and has the following options: short January 2018 $30 puts on Kinder Morgan and long January 2018 $30 calls on Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool owns shares of Kinder Morgan.

More on Dividend Stocks

Construction work on a site
Dividend Stocks

Canadian Infrastructure Stocks: Building the Future and Your Wealth

These two Canadian infrastructure stocks are highly defensive and offer excellent long-term potential, making them ideal for this uncertain market.

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

Dividend Investors: Top Canadian Utility Stocks for June 2023

These three top utility stocks could be excellent buys for income-seeking investors.

Read more »

A tractor harvests lentils.
Dividend Stocks

Why Nutrien Stock Is Still a Great Buy on the TSX Today

Nutrien (TSX:NTR) stock has gone through major ups and downs thanks to outside influences, but its bottom line remains incredibly…

Read more »

Businessperson's Hand Putting Coin In Piggybank
Dividend Stocks

Build Your Retirement Fortune With These Top TFSA Stocks

Here are two top Canadian dividend stocks you can add to your TFSA to build wealth for retirement.

Read more »

Path to retirement
Dividend Stocks

Invest in These Stocks for a Worry-free Retirement Income Stream

Are you looking for an income stream that can pay you throughout your retirement? Then invest a portion of your…

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

Is BCE Stock Still a Top Telecom Investment in Canada?

Canada’s telecoms can provide growth and income in a defensive shell. Let’s see if BCE is still a top telecom…

Read more »

Dollar symbol and Canadian flag on keyboard
Dividend Stocks

2 Canadian Dividend Stocks I’ll Be Buying Hand Over Fist in June 2023

These two beaten-down Canadian dividend stocks could help you earn handsome returns on your investment in the long term if…

Read more »

edit Close-up Of A Piggybank With Eyeglasses And Calculator On Desk
Dividend Stocks

If You’d Invested $10,000 in Loblaw Stock in 2012, Here’s How Much You’d Have Today

Loblaw stock had a crazy decade, with many huge moves. This could have created wealth from a $10,000 investment, but…

Read more »