Could Canada Build Too Many Oil Pipelines?

TransCanada Corporation’s (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) decision to reapply for permission to build the Keystone XL pipeline could lead to a glut of pipeline capacity in the country if it builds all of the pipelines currently under consideration.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

After years of opposition and uncertainty, Canada appears poised to break ground on two major oil-export pipelines in the very near future. In addition, another long-delayed pipeline project could eventually break ground after TransCanada Corporation (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) recently submitted a Presidential Permit application for approval of its highly controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

That possible project restart comes on top of the company’s continued efforts to construct the Energy East pipeline in Canada. What’s worth noting about these projects is that they could result in Canada building more pipeline capacity than it needs, especially given that oil producers are sanctioning far fewer projects these days due to lower oil prices.

From a shortfall to a glut

Canada currently has enough pipeline takeaway capacity to move more than four million barrels of oil per day. That leaves it with adequate capacity given that the country produces slightly less than four million barrels per day. However, oil sands output will expand sharply over the next few years, reaching roughly 4.5 million barrels per day by 2019 as several major oil sands expansion projects come online.

These developments include Suncor Energy Inc.’s Fort Hills project and additional phases of Canadian Natural Resources Limited‘s Horizon facility, which will combine to add more than 300,000 barrels per day of output by 2019.

As these and other projects ramp up, the output will quickly outstrip the country’s pipeline capacity, which is expected to cause a widening shortfall until 2019 when Kinder Morgan Inc. (NYSE:KMI) and Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB)(NYSE:ENB) expect to complete their recently approved expansion projects.

In Kinder Morgan’s case, its Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion will boost that pipeline’s capacity from 300,000 barrels per day up to 890,000 barrels per day. Meanwhile, Enbridge’s Line 3 Replacement will restore the line to its original capacity of 760,000 barrels per day — up from its current capacity of 390,000 barrels per day.

Once complete, these projects should push Canada’s oil sands takeaway capacity to more than five million barrels per day. Under current projections, the country’s oil output is not expected to exceed that capacity until sometime in the latter half of next decade.

Trying to cut back in line

TransCanada had hoped to capture some of Canada’s growing demand for pipeline capacity by proposing to build the Keystone XL pipeline, which would move Canadian oil to the U.S. Gulf Coast. However, that project faced intense opposition from environmentalists, which eventually led the company to propose the larger Energy East pipeline across Canada.

That decision to focus on another project that didn’t require U.S. approval seemed like a prudent move, especially after former U.S. President Obama officially rejected the proposed 830,000 barrel per day Keystone XL pipeline in 2015.

However, the Trump Administration recently invited TransCanada to reapply for a permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline, which it quickly did. As a result, the company could conceivably construct both Keystone XL and Energy East, which would boost Canada’s oil sands takeaway capacity to more than six million barrels per day by early next decade.

The problem with that scenario is that production from the oil sands is not expected to be much more than 4.5 million barrels per day by the time those projects could go into service. For perspective, that is just enough oil to fill existing capacity plus Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline without needing even to use the capacity of Enbridge’s Line 3 expansion.

In fact, even if Canada’s oil producers accelerate the country’s production later next decade, the country would still only need less than half of TransCanada’s proposed pipeline capacity.

This projection suggests that the company does not need to build both projects anytime soon. As such, it is possible that TransCanada will hold off on its equally controversial Energy East project and instead focus on taking advantage of the opportunity to build Keystone XL before that door shuts again. It could then attempt to move forward with Energy East once producers begin work on a new slate of oil sands growth projects.

Investor takeaway

While Canada clearly needs more oil pipeline capacity, it does not yet need all the projects currently under consideration. That likely means TransCanada will need to shelve one of its projects with Energy East the likely candidate because the company appears to have an easier path to building the Keystone XL at the moment.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo owns shares of Kinder Morgan and has the following options: short January 2018 $30 puts on Kinder Morgan and long January 2018 $30 calls on Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool owns shares of Kinder Morgan.

More on Dividend Stocks

Businessman holding tablet and showing a growing virtual hologram of statistics, graph and chart with arrow up on dark background. Stock market. Business growth, planning and strategy concept
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Magic: Earn Enormous Passive Income That the CRA Can’t Touch

If you're seeking out passive income, with zero taxes involved, then get on board with a TFSA and this portfolio…

Read more »

Man with no money. Businessman holding empty wallet
Dividend Stocks

2 Stocks Under $50 New Investors Can Confidently Buy

There are some great stocks under $50 that every investor needs to know about. Here’s a look at two great…

Read more »

think thought consider
Dividend Stocks

Down 10.88%: Is ATD Stock a Good Buy After Earnings?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX:ATD) stock might not be the easy buy-case it once was. Here’s a look at what happened.

Read more »

money cash dividends
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Dividend Stocks: Earn $1,200/Year Tax-Free

Canadian stocks like Fortis are a must-have in your portfolio to earn tax-free yields for decades.

Read more »

sale discount best price
Dividend Stocks

1 Dividend Stock Down 11 Percent to Buy Right Now

Do you want a great dividend stock down 11% that can provide years of growth potential? Here's one heavily discounted…

Read more »

Growth from coins
Dividend Stocks

1 Grade A Dividend Stock Down 11% to Buy and Hold Forever 

If you're looking for the right dividend stock at the right price, you're going to want to consider this insurance…

Read more »

Target. Stand out from the crowd
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Stocks to Double Up on Right Now

Are you looking for dividend stocks to buy right now? Here are two top picks!

Read more »

edit Taxes CRA
Dividend Stocks

Tax Time: How to Keep More of Your Money

Nearly everyone hates paying taxes, although Canadians can lessen the financial pain with the right tax strategies.

Read more »