Better Buy: Barrick Gold Corp. vs. Goldcorp Inc.

Gold stocks tend to perform well following an interest rate hike, so it’s time to invest in the gold sector.

Barrick Gold Corp. (TSX:ABX)(NYSE:ABX) is the world’s largest gold mining company, and Goldcorp Inc. (TSX:G)(NYSE:GG) is the fourth-largest.

The two companies released their 2017 second-quarter results on July 26. You may wonder which company is a better buy. Let’s find out by comparing the two gold giants.

Barrick Gold Corp.

The biggest gold producer reported a 2017 second-quarter profit of $1.08 billion, or $0.93 per share.

Earnings, adjusted for non-recurring gains, were $261 million, or $0.22 per share. This is up 65.2% from $158 million, or $0.14 per share, in last year’s second quarter. Analysts had expected Barrick Gold to earn $0.18 per share. Year over year, Barrick Gold’s EPS has grown by 675%.

The Toronto-based company posted revenue of $2.16 billion for the quarter. This is up 7.5% from $2.01 billion last year.

Gold production in the second quarter was 1.43 million ounces — up 6.9% year over year. All-in sustaining costs, the industry benchmark, were $710 per ounce — down 9.2% and below estimates of $720-770. Those costs are among the lowest in the industry.

Barrick Gold was able to reduce its total debt by $309 million to $7.44 million. The company expects a full-year production of 5.3-5.6 million ounces and all-in sustaining costs of $720-770 per ounce.

Barrick Gold currently has a return on equity of 27.83%, a return on invested capital of 16.33%, and a net profit margin of 31.74%.

A few days ago, we learned that Tanzania’s government and Barrick Gold have started talks to resolve a tax dispute involving Acacia Mining. The government accused Acacia, in which Barrick holds a majority stake, of evading taxes over the years by under-declaring exports. Acacia denies the accusations and has been hit by a $190 billion tax bill.

Barrick Gold shares are down nearly 2% since the beginning of the year.

Goldcorp Inc.

Canadian gold producer Goldcorp reported better-than-expected earnings on July 26, helped by lower costs.

The world’s fourth-biggest gold producer by market value reported net earnings of $135 million, or $0.16 per share, for its 2017 second quarter, which ended June 30.

A year ago, the company reported a loss of $78 million, or $0.09. This loss was mostly due to a reduction in production at Penasquito, its biggest mine, following a maintenance shutdown and a slow restart.

Adjusted for one-off items, earnings were $0.12 per share, beating analysts’ estimate of $0.09 per share, on average, according to Thomson Reuters.

The Vancouver-based company produced 635,000 ounces of gold in the second quarter at a cost of $800 an ounce. This represents production that’s 4% larger than the 613,000 ounces of gold it produced at a cost of $1,067 per ounce in the second quarter of 2016.

Goldcorp left its 2017 gold production forecast unchanged at approximately 2.5 million ounces. However, it lowered its forecast for all-in sustaining costs to $825 an ounce from a previous $850, reflecting progress on its cost-reduction program.

Goldcorp currently has a return on equity of 3.48%, a return on invested capital of 3.51%, and a net profit margin of 13.22%.

Goldcorp’s share price is down more than 12% since the beginning of the year and is trading very near its 52-week low.

Which gold producer should you invest in?

By comparing the two gold giants, one is standing out from the other, even if the two have had a better-than-expected second quarter.

With continued profitability and net debt reduction, Barrick Gold is well in advance of Goldcorp. It also benefits from low cash costs and solid free cash flows. I bet that Barrick Gold is going to do better than Goldcorp in the months to come.

The Next Canadian Superbrand You’ve Never Heard of...

This small-cap stock is “Hidden in Plain Sight!” It’s flying under the radar and is being touted as a “royalty collector” by several of our top Canadian analysts.

Right now you aren’t on the list to receive our formal “buy recommendation”, so don’t delay – simply click here to enter your email address and discover how you can access the exclusive report.

Fool contributor Stephanie Bedard-Chateauneuf has no position in any stocks mentioned.

I consent to receiving information from The Motley Fool via email, direct mail, and occasional special offer phone calls. I understand I can unsubscribe from these updates at any time. Please read the Privacy Statement and Terms of Service for more information.