What Is Home Capital Group Inc. Worth?

Is beaten-down Home Capital Group Inc. (TSX:HCG) attractively valued and a worthwhile investment?

| More on:

With the shareholder vote to approve Warren Buffett’s purchase of an almost additional 24 million shares in Home Capital Group Inc. (TSX:HCG) looming, investors are asking themselves if the alternative mortgage lender is a worthwhile investment. This is especially the case when second-quarter 2017 results assign a book value of $21.63 per share, which is a 55% premium to Home Capital’s price at the time of writing.

This has led to some pundits claiming that Home Capital is significantly undervalued and is a very attractive investment. While there is certainly some truth to those claims, it is clear that Home Capital’s tangible book value is nowhere near as high as the book value stated in its second-quarter results.

Let me explain. 

Now what?

Tangible book value is one of the best tools available to investors for identifying whether or not a company is undervalued. Essentially, it takes the sum of the value of all assets less goodwill, intangible assets, and liabilities. After conducting this calculation using the numbers on Home Capital’s second-quarter balance sheet, I have identified a tangible book value of $20.23 per share, which is a 6.5% discount to the its book value of $21.63 per share.

The elephant in the room is the upcoming shareholder vote to approve Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B) proposed $267 million investment to acquire an additional 23,955,420 common shares at $10.30 each. This will have a significant dilutive effect on existing shareholders; according to Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., the dilution could be as great as 30%, and if that is the case, it would mean that Home Capital’s tangible book value is closer to $14.16 per share.

After conducting my own calculations, I’ve identified that if the deal is approved, it would dilute Home Capital’s value by about 23%. Such a significant dilution of value would cause its tangible book value to fall to $15.56 per share. While that would be a big hit for many existing investors, it represents a 11% premium to Home Capital’s price at the time of writing.

You see, the dilutive effect of Buffett’s deal coupled with the market remaining jittery over the outlook for the business because of its near collapse leaves it trading at a significant discount to its fair value.

Nonetheless, there are clear indications that Home Capital’s business has turned the corner and has stabilized.

One promising development from the crisis was that it highlighted that credit quality was not an issue for the alternative lender, and it battled to stay afloat by selling tranches of its mortgages. By the end of the second quarter, Home Capital had an impressive non-performing-loan ratio of a mere 0.23% — one of the lowest in its industry. That coupled with a loan-to-value ratio for its uninsured mortgages of 59% highlights just how prudently Home Capital has been managing its mortgage book.

Importantly, the lender has been able to boost its deposit-taking activities to pre-crisis levels; along with aggregate liquidity of $3.94 billion and a notable capital ratio of 17.54%, this underscores the strength of its business.

So what?

The dilutive impact of Buffett’s planned acquisition of a further 24 million shares at a considerable discount to its book value and market price is weighing heavily on its stock price. While there are both merits and disadvantages associated with this deal for stockholders, what is increasingly clear is that Home Capital is attractively valued, even if the deal proceeds.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway (B shares).

More on Bank Stocks

You Should Know This
Bank Stocks

3 Game-Changers at Canadian Western Bank: How They Impact CWB Stock

Canadian Western Bank’s business profile is changing, and CWB stock investors could witness positive developments going forward.

Read more »

A worker uses a double monitor computer screen in an office.
Stocks for Beginners

Better Buy: TD Bank or Scotiabank?

If you want dividends, bank stocks can be the best. But which is the better buy depends on your risk…

Read more »

STACKED COINS DEPICTING MONEY GROWTH
Stocks for Beginners

1 Magnificent Dividend Stock That’s Down 21% and Trading at a Once-in-a-Decade Valuation

This dividend stock is near 52-week highs, but still down from all-time highs, with a highly valuable P/E ratio you…

Read more »

Man making notes on graphs and charts
Bank Stocks

Better Buy: Royal Bank Stock or CIBC Stock?

Both of these banks have provided investors with long-term rewards, but which is the better buy to get out of…

Read more »

Bank Stocks

Better Bank Buy: Scotiabank Stock or CIBC?

One big Canadian bank has obviously outperformed the other, which makes it likely a better buy today as well.

Read more »

Dice engraved with the words buy and sell
Bank Stocks

Scotiabank Stock Has a High Yield, But Is it a Buy?

The Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS) stock is very cheap and high yielding, but faces a lot of currency risk.

Read more »

Bank sign on traditional europe building facade
Bank Stocks

JPMorgan vs. Royal Bank of Canada: Which Bank Stock Is Better Buy?

Blue-chip bank stocks such as JPMorgan and Royal Bank of Canada are solid long-term bets for shareholders in 2024.

Read more »

Bank sign on traditional europe building facade
Stocks for Beginners

1 Magnificent TSX Dividend Stock Down 22% to Buy and Hold Forever

This dividend stock may be down 22% from all-time highs, but is up 17% in the last year alone. And…

Read more »