I’m a bit dumbfounded sometimes when I see articles that talk about good stocks that are under $10 or $5, or when my friends say that a stock is too expensive, referring only to its absolute price. Instead, you’d be better of looking at a stock’s price relative to its earnings. I can understand why price might be an issue if you’re trying to buy Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its nearly $300,000 price tag. After all, to own even one share of that company is out of reach for most investors. However, when it comes to most of the stocks out there,…
To keep reading, enter your email address or login below.
I’m a bit dumbfounded sometimes when I see articles that talk about good stocks that are under $10 or $5, or when my friends say that a stock is too expensive, referring only to its absolute price. Instead, you’d be better of looking at a stock’s price relative to its earnings.
I can understand why price might be an issue if you’re trying to buy Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its nearly $300,000 price tag. After all, to own even one share of that company is out of reach for most investors.
However, when it comes to most of the stocks out there, it really shouldn’t even be a consideration.
Number of shares just doesn’t matter
Whether I buy 50 shares of Snap Inc. (NYSE:SNAP) or just one share of Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG), my total investment will be roughly about the same, and in the end, that’s all that really matters. A 5% increase is still a 5% increase in your portfolio’s value, regardless of what the stock price is.
All that the stock price tells you is the number of shares you’ll be able to buy for the amount you plan to invest, but it really has no significance. You won’t earn any more in dividends, and you won’t turn more of a profit simply by having more shares.
I’m sure most investors would rather have one share of Alphabet rather than 500 of Snap, if for no other reason than that Alphabet is a much better stock that actually makes money and has a lot of upside to it. Factoring in the number of shares you own is pointless, and I find it baffling that people would even consider it.
Investing low dollars isn’t worthwhile
I suppose one argument could be made that investors can’t afford to invest in Alphabet because its stock is over $1,000. However, I’d suggest that if you’re investing less than $2,000 at a time, it’s likely not worth the effort. On most exchanges, you’ll be charged a total commission of ~$20 to buy and to sell, so on a $1,000 investment, you’ll need to earn 2% just to break even. The lower your investment, the higher your breakeven price will be.
In some scenarios, you may be able to avoid fees with certain brokerages, but with a low-dollar investment, the amount of profit you could earn might make you wonder if it’s worth the effort. Consider a scenario where you do research, find a good stock, and buy $1,000 worth of shares. If the stock has a great return and increases 10%, you’ve only made $100 on all that effort, and that’s under a very good scenario. The old adage of needing money to make money still rings true.
Penny stocks aren’t worth the risk
One way investors will try to maximize their returns and justify making small investments is by buying penny stocks, since the upside could be tremendous. Even a one-cent change in price can be significant and produce large returns for your portfolio. However, a lot of these investments are built off hype and speculation, and the swings that happen with penny stocks can easily eclipse what we’ve seen happen to Aphria Inc. (TSX:APH) and other pot stocks recently.
Everyone hopes and believes that their penny stock is going to be the next Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and will strike it rich when the share price takes off. Unfortunately, in most cases, it won’t follow Amazon’s path, and investors will be lucky if it just doesn’t end up being another Southridge Enterprises Inc.
You've probably never even heard of this up-and-coming e-commerce powerhouse headquartered in Eastern Ontario...
But, despite coming public just last year, it’s already helping the likes of Budweiser... Tesla... Subway... and Red Bull move $9.9 BILLION (and counting) worth of goods online each year.
And now it’s caught the eye of the legendary investor who got behind Amazon.com in 1997 -- just before it shot up over 23,000% and made investors like you and me rich beyond their wildest dreams.
Click here to discover why this investor says it’s time to buy.
John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), and Amazon. Tom Gardner owns shares of Alphabet (A shares) and Alphabet (C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, and Berkshire Hathaway (B shares).