Evergrande Collapse Sparks Global Economic Fear

The ongoing implosion of Evergrande (SEHK:3333) has investors around the world freaking out.

| More on:

The world is in the midst of an economic panic, and it’s all because of a company few had heard of until just days ago.

China Evergrande (SEHK:3333) is a Chinese property development firm that is carrying about $300 billion in debt on its balance sheet. It is the second-largest developer in China and the most indebted developer in the world.

Evergrande does not have enough cash flow to pay its upcoming bills. It has a $83 million interest payment due this week that it has told creditors it won’t be able to make. Looking further ahead, Evergrande has multi-billion-dollar maturities to pay for. For example, it has $7.4 billion worth of principal repayments coming up in 2022. While Evergrande had ¥196 billion in cash (approximately US$25 billion) as of June 30, the amount had been shrinking over the course of several years. Today, the company says it doesn’t have enough money to pay back its creditors.

Why people are worried

It would be one thing if Evergrande simply defaulted, and that was the end of it. Big companies have defaulted in the past — life went on. But the complicating factor with Evergrande is the sheer amount of debt on its balance sheet. With $300 billion in total liabilities, the company owes money to many creditors. The biggest ones are Chinese banks. After that, there are several major U.S. and European financial institutions. Canada’s very own Royal Bank of Canada is among the institutions holding Evergrande bonds.

If Evergrande defaults on the full $300 billion worth of liabilities it has, the ripple effects in the financial system could be felt worldwide. Certainly, Chinese banks will lose out on enormous sums of money — Western banks, too, to an extent. It has been well publicized that banks all around the world own Evergrande debt. What’s sometimes missed is the fact that the foreign banks owning Evergrande bonds don’t have that much exposure. Most of their holdings are in the hundreds of millions, not billions, and these are institutions with trillions in assets. Still, the default of a company as large as Evergrande could push China into a recession, and that could have effects felt around the world.

What’s the worst-case scenario?

Having assessed the amount of money on the line in the Evergrande implosion, we can move on to another question: what’s the worst that could happen?

Evergrande has been compared to Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns in the 2008 and 2009 financial crisis. Those were banks whose enormous losses on mortgage backed securities contributed to the global recession of the late 2000s. These banks’ problems started when borrowers began defaulting on high-interest, sub-prime loans. Lenders began losing money on those loans immediately. The problem was compounded when $3.7 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac couldn’t be serviced. Ultimately, the two received about $200 billion in bailout money to meet their obligations.

According to the Chicago fed, there were 3.8 million foreclosures between 2007 and 2010. The average price of a U.S. house at that time was about $205,000. So, that was approximately $780 billion worth of mortgage debt that couldn’t be serviced.

The total for Evergrande comes in at around $300 billion. Estimates range from $305 billion to $313 billion (it depends on the exchange rate). That amount puts the Evergrande debt in the same league as the mortgage debt that kicked off the financial crisis. It’s certainly not as high, but it’s up there — a little less than half. This suggests that the Evergrande debt has the magnitude needed to start a financial crisis.

However, the mortgages involved in the Great Financial Crisis impacted a full $3.7 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities. That’s more than 10 times Evergrande’s total debt. So, it’s not quite clear the scale of the crisis Evergrande could trigger. Its debts aren’t as large as the debts that triggered the 2008/2009 crisis, but the indirect effects of default could be significant.

Fool contributor Andrew Button has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Tech Stocks

concept of growth
Tech Stocks

BlackBerry Stock Already Rallied: Here’s Why the Best Gains May Still Be Ahead

BlackBerry just ripped nearly 20% higher on a strong quarter, but investors still need proof the turnaround can last.

Read more »

man looks worried about something on his phone
Dividend Stocks

The Market Has Punished This Dividend Giant Enough: I’d Buy Before Sentiment Turns

BCE’s dividend cut scared investors away, but the smaller payout may now be safer and leave room to repair the…

Read more »

Data center woman holding laptop
Dividend Stocks

Canada’s Data-Centre Buildout Has Already Begun: These Stocks Could Be Next

Canada’s AI data-centre buildout is creating investable demand for electricity and electrical equipment, not just chips.

Read more »

dividends grow over time
Tech Stocks

If You Missed Shopify’s First Run, Don’t Ignore These 2 Canadian Growth Stocks

Two Canadian growth stocks may be building the kind of compounding “flywheel” that once made Shopify a legend.

Read more »

technology moves fast
Tech Stocks

This Stock Is Still Deep in the Red, but the Business Has Already Turned

Lightspeed’s stock is still down 90% from its peak, but the business is starting to look like a real turnaround.

Read more »

young adult uses credit card to shop online
Tech Stocks

A $7,000 TFSA Contribution Could Become $70,000: Here’s Why I’d Invest It Now

Waiting for the “perfect” TFSA buying moment can cost you years of compounding, especially with a long-run growth stock like…

Read more »

chip glows with a blue AI
Tech Stocks

Celestica by the Numbers: 62% Revenue Growth and Real Strong Margins

Celestica (TSX:CLS) is growing fast and its recent dip might not signal the end.

Read more »

A worker gives a business presentation.
Dividend Stocks

Your Dividend Income Is Falling Behind Inflation: Here’s How I’d Fix It

Inflation quietly cuts the spending power of “steady” dividends, so income investors need dividend growth, not just yield.

Read more »