Canadian Investors: Recreate Warren Buffett’s 90/10 Portfolio With These 2 BMO ETFs

Warren Buffett endorses this portfolio. Here’s how Canadian investors can recreate it.

| More on:
data analytics, chart and graph icons with female hands typing on laptop in background

Image source: Getty Images

I don’t think Warren Buffett needs any introduction. Quite simply, he is arguably the most successful value investor and stock picker in history, with a long track record of outperforming the market handily.

However, rather than trying to find undervalued stocks, Buffett has advised that the masses keep it simple and just invest passively in an S&P 500 index fund. Buffett loves the index as a hands-off, low-cost method for building wealth.

Buffett’s strategy

In a 2013 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Buffett indicated that upon his passing, the trustee of his estate will invest 90% of his wife’s inheritance in a low-cost Vanguard S&P 500 Index Fund, and the other 10% in short-term U.S. treasury bonds. That’s quite a departure from Berkshire’s portfolio of hand-picked value stocks!

Make no mistake, this is a risky portfolio that can have volatile movements along with the rest of the market. Most of the risk here is still being contributed by the 90% stocks, with the 10% bonds not doing much to offset volatility. I think Buffett sees that 10% as a safer parking garage for his massive cash fortune — his wife could live off that alone indefinitely.

However, the portfolio does quite well for investors with a long time horizon and even holds up during the retirement withdrawal phase. Javier Estrada, professor of finance at the IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain, found that Buffett’s 90/10 asset allocation works well with a 4% withdrawal rule. Looking at rolling 30-year intervals, Estrada found that Buffett’s portfolio had a low failure rate of 2.3%, which was comparable to the traditional 60/40 portfolio.

Which ETFs should you use?

Investors looking to implement Buffett’s 90/10 portfolio can convert currency and buy USD-listed ETFs in their RRSPs. This grants access to the funds of his choice and saves you 15% on the foreign withholding tax imposed on non-Canadian dividends.

However, if you’re looking for a simple solution without the hassle of currency conversion, using Canadian-listed ETFs is fine too. You’re sacrificing a smidgen of tax efficiency for simplicity, which I think is always worth it. Don’t let the tax tail wag the dog, as they say.

For the equity portion, investors can buy BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (TSX:ZSP), which costs a low management expense ratio (MER) of 0.09%. For the bond portion, investors can buy BMO Short-Term Federal Bond Index ETF (TSX:ZFS) as a substitute for short-term U.S. Treasuries for a 0.22% MER.

To make a Canadian version of Buffett’s portfolio, hold these two ETFs in a 90/10 allocation with dividends reinvested and annual rebalancing. ZSP will be driving most of your returns, allowing you to match 90% of the S&P 500’s total return, while VSB reduces volatility slightly and allows you to park some cash to buy dips with.

The Foolish takeaway

The Warren Buffett 90/10 portfolio is an extremely simple, low-cost, and easy to implement investment strategy. I expect it to outperform the majority of stock pickers and actively managed funds out there.

However, it could be optimized further. Personally, I would prefer more of an allocation to long-term U.S. Treasuries, small-cap value stocks, and international stocks for lowered volatility and improved risk-adjusted returns.

Then again, who am I to argue against Buffett’s advice?

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Tony Dong has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

A man smiles while playing a video game.
Retirement

Retired Canadians: The Smartest Income Stocks to Buy With $5,000

TD Bank (TSX:TD) stock stands out as a dividend stock steal at these prices.

Read more »

Target. Stand out from the crowd
Investing

3 Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next 10 Years

These Canadian stocks have potential to deliver significant returns over the next 10 years and diversify your portfolio.

Read more »

Pile of Canadian dollar bills in various denominations
Dividend Stocks

How to Use Your TFSA to Earn $5,000 Per Year in Tax-Free Income

Are you looking for ways to earn $5,000 in TFSA passive income? Consider rebalancing your portfolio, shifting $20,000 to these…

Read more »

money cash dividends
Dividend Stocks

Dividend Powerhouses: Top Canadian Stocks to Enhance Your Portfolio

Three TSX dividend powerhouses are the top options for Canadians looking to enhance their investment portfolios.

Read more »

HIGH VOLTAGE ELECRICITY TOWERS
Investing

1 Safe Canadian Utility Stock Offering a Secure Yield

Hydro One (TSX:H) stock looks like a worthy bet as the tides get somewhat rougher in Q4 2024.

Read more »

edit Person using calculator next to charts and graphs
Dividend Stocks

The Best Stocks to Invest $2,000 in Right Now

Do you have some extra cash to invest this month? Here are two value-priced dividend stocks to buy for a…

Read more »

Shopping card with boxes labelled REITs, ETFs, Bonds, Stocks
Dividend Stocks

TFSA: Can You Really Invest $95,000 Tax-Free?

You can, in fact, hold TSX stocks like Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc (TSX:ATD) tax-free in a TFSA. But can you hold…

Read more »

young woman celebrating a victory while working with mobile phone in the office
Investing

TFSA: 4 Canadian Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever

TFSA investors can expect to generate above-average capital gains from these fundamentally strong Canadian stocks.

Read more »