Which Is a Better Buy Today: Manulife Financial Corp. or Sun Life Financial Inc.?

Why have Manulife Financial Corp.’s (TSX:MFC)(NYSE:MFC) shares remained depressed, while Sun Life Financial Inc.’s (TSX:SLF)(NYSE:SLF) shares have stayed strong?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Manulife Financial Corp. (TSX:MFC)(NYSE:MFC) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (TSX:SLF)(NYSE:SLF) are two of the three biggest life insurers in Canada, but that’s not all. They also provide insurance and wealth-management products and services in the United States and Asia.

Sun Life has been a stronger performer recently. Its shares are 1.5% higher than they were a year ago and 55% higher than they were five years ago. Comparatively, Manulife is 23% lower than it was a year ago and 11% higher than it was five years ago.

Does this mean Sun Life is a better buy?

Let’s first look at the recent business performance of Sun Life and Manulife.

First-quarter results

In the first quarter, Manulife reported core earnings of $905 million, net income of $1,045 million (44.5% higher than the first quarter of 2015), and a return on equity (ROE) of 10.8%. The strong U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar benefited Manulife by boosting its core earnings by about 9% ($75 million).

Manulife also experienced strong top-line growth. Specifically, premiums and deposits for insurance products were $8.2 billion for the quarter, which was a growth of 8% on a constant-currency basis compared with the first quarter of 2015.

On the other hand, Sun Life’s net income was $540 million, which was 22.4% higher than the same period in 2015. It also achieved a ROE of 12.4%.

Both companies continue to be profitable; Manulife has a higher net income growth and Sun Life has a higher ROE.

Comparing the two

Valuation: At under $18 per share, Manulife trades at about 9.9 times its earnings and at a discount of about 7% from its book value. With the potential to trade at 15 times its earnings in favourable times, Manulife could be worth about $26.80 per share, indicating a discount of up to 30%.

On the other hand, Sun Life trades at about 11.3 times its earnings and 1.4 times its book value. Sun Life is fairly valued compared to its normal multiple in the last few years.

Dividend: Manulife yields 4.2% with a payout ratio of 41%. Its dividend is 8.8% higher than it was a year ago.

On the other hand, Sun Life yields 3.8% with a payout ratio of 43%. This aligns with its target payout ratio of 40-50%. Its dividend is 6.6% higher than it was a year ago.

Why Manulife trades at a discount

From a valuation perspective, Manulife seems to be a better buy because it trades at a lower multiple. However, Manulife’s depressed shares stem from its significant exposure to market and interest rate risks.

At the end of the first quarter Manulife’s policy liabilities, established for variable annuity and segregated fund guarantees, were $9,584 million.

On the other hand, in the last few years Sun Life has made efforts to reduce the impact of market and interest rates on its business by building a more diversified business and focusing on growth and higher ROE with less volatility. This is reflected in Sun Life’s stronger performance.

Conclusion

If Manulife’s multiple only expands to 13.5 (not to 15) in the next three to five years, supported by an estimated earnings growth rate of about 9%, investors can get an estimated annualized rate of return of 18-23%. However, it comes with higher exposure to market and interest rate risks, which could continue to weigh down the shares.

On the other hand, although Sun Life is fairly valued, it’s less risky and should offer a smoother ride for investors. In the medium term, it aims to increase its earnings per share by 8-10% per year on average and targets a ROE of 12-14%.

According to Sun Life’s earnings growth estimate, an investment in it today offers an estimated annualized return of 11.8-13.8%, which includes its dividend.

Investors should ask themselves if they want to take on more risk with Manulife and hope for a higher return or if they want less risk and accept a likely lower return but a smoother ride from Sun Life.

Fool contributor Kay Ng has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

Concept of multiple streams of income
Dividend Stocks

Top Stocks to Double Up on Right Now

Investors can double up their positions in three top stocks that continue to outperform amid heightened volatility.

Read more »

middle-aged couple work together on laptop
Dividend Stocks

3 Stocks Worth a Serious Look for Long-Term Canadian Investors

Long-term Canadian investors can anchor their portfolio on three stocks that can preserve capital and help build serious wealth.

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing Canada's Tax Free Savings Account
Dividend Stocks

A Simple Way for Canadians to Earn $500 a Month Tax-Free From a TFSA

Canadians can earn $500 a month tax-free from a TFSA using a methodical approach and multi-stock portfolio.

Read more »

Abstract technology background image with standing businessman
Dividend Stocks

3 Canadian Stocks That Could Win From More Power Demand

Rising electricity demand is creating winners across generators, grid tech, and long-term infrastructure builders on the TSX.

Read more »

chart reflected in eyeglass lenses
Dividend Stocks

2 Canadian Dividend Stocks That Look Reasonably Priced Right Now

These top TSX dividend stocks are off their 2026 highs.

Read more »

boy in bowtie and glasses gives positive thumbs up
Dividend Stocks

A Year Later: 2 Stocks I’d Buy Again Without Hesitating

Brookfield and WSP have already had a strong year, but their earnings momentum and long runways still make them look…

Read more »

Income and growth financial chart
Dividend Stocks

1 Canadian Stock That Could Be Set Up for a Big Comeback in 2026

CN remains well below the 2024 highs. Is this the right time to buy?

Read more »

Retirees sip their morning coffee outside.
Dividend Stocks

Retiring? $1 Million Isn’t Enough Anymore

$1,000,000 invested in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index Fund (TSX:XIU) doesn't provide enough income to retire on.

Read more »