Surprise! Dividend Stocks Performed Better Over 92 Years

There is proof! Between 1930 and 2022, a study found that dividend stocks did better than the S&P 500, but only certain ones.

| More on:
Female raising hands enjoying vacation, standing on background of blue cloudless sky.

Source: Getty Images

It’s true, and it’s science. When it comes to investing, dividend stocks have been shown to grow more year after year after year. That’s compared to the average of the S&P 500, and not just over the last 20 years — not even the last 50. No, between 1930 and 2022, a study by Hartford Funds found that dividend income contributed 41% of total return to the S&P 500 Index.

So, let’s get into what’s going on here and how investors can take advantage in the long term.

Some history

The study, as mentioned, looks at the period between 1930 and 2022. During this time, it found that dividends played a larger role in contributing to total returns during the 1940s, 1960s, and 1970s. These were decades where total returns were below 10%. This also saw dividends see lower returns during the 1950s, 1980s, and 1990s, when returns hit double digits.

The 1990s, it found, were when dividends were de-emphasized. Instead, companies focused on reinvesting in the business. So, 2000 to 2009 was referred to as the “lost decade,” where the S&P 500 Index produced a negative return.

The study then found that during these past decades, there were five groupings of dividend stocks that increased their dividends. The first increased by the most each year, and the fifth the lowest amount each year. What they found was that the second highest beat the S&P 500 Index eight times out of the 10 decades. Further, the first and third levels tied for second, with those increasing their dividend by the lowest, also saw these stocks lag behind the S&P 500.

What this means

What investors can take away from this is that dividend stocks that fall within the top 60% to 80% of dividend increasers could see the best results in growth. That also means not necessarily looking for the dividend stocks with the highest dividend yield.

Instead, the study recommended looking at the payout ratio. It found that dividend stocks offering the highest dividend increases may not be sustainable. These stocks averaged a payout ratio of 74% during the period. Meanwhile, the second-highest level remained around 40%.

What this means is that dividend stocks need to put more of their cash towards dividends on a regular basis. Over time, and in times of trouble, this could cause dividend stocks to need to cut the dividend. And a cut can be seen as a sign of weakness, causing shares to drop. Meanwhile, the second-highest dividend stocks would have enough cash saved to keep dividends coming.

An option to consider

A stock that ticks a lot of these boxes is Lundin Mining (TSX:LUN). Of course, no stock is absolutely perfect, but Lundin stock is pretty close. The dividend stock offers a 58% payout ratio, averaging around 40% over the last decade. During that time, it increased its dividend by 110%, so not a huge amount but not low either.

Furthermore, the company has seen returns of 142% in the last decade alone. That’s compared to the 50% seen by the TSX during that same period. So, now you can grab a 3.22% dividend yield and, based on its history, likely continue to see strong returns as well as continue seeing a dividend come through!

Of course, there are a lot of other factors to consider, and you should always do your own research. But the point here is that if you want strong returns, don’t just rush to the first growth stock you see. For long-term growth, consider finding dividends with a long history of strong dividend increases. They’ll have enough cash to move forward while still paying you to hold on tight.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

More on Dividend Stocks

financial freedom sign
Dividend Stocks

RRSP Secrets: 3 Millionaire Strategies Revealed

The RRSP helps Canadians save for retirement and proper utilization can make you a millionaire over time or when you…

Read more »

dividends grow over time
Dividend Stocks

3 Fabulous Dividend Stocks to Buy in April

If you're looking to boost your passive income while interest rates are elevated, here are three of the best dividend…

Read more »

calculate and analyze stock
Dividend Stocks

2 Top TSX Dividend Stocks That Still Look Oversold

These top TSX dividend-growth stocks now offer very high yields.

Read more »

Dollar symbol and Canadian flag on keyboard
Dividend Stocks

Beginner Investors: 5 Top Canadian Stocks for 2024

New to the stock market? Here are five Canadian companies to build a portfolio around.

Read more »

Increasing yield
Dividend Stocks

Want to Gain $1,000 in Annual Dividend Income? Invest $16,675 in These 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks

Are you looking for cash right now? These are likely your best options to make over $1,000 in annual dividend…

Read more »

TELECOM TOWERS
Dividend Stocks

Passive-Income Investors: The Best Telecom Bargain to Buy in May

BCE (TSX:BCE) stock may be entering deep-value mode, as the multi-year selloff continues through 2024.

Read more »

edit Safe pig, protect money
Dividend Stocks

3 Safe Dividend Stocks to Own for the Next 10 Years

These Canadian dividend gems could help you earn worry-free passive income over the next decade.

Read more »

A plant grows from coins.
Dividend Stocks

Dividend Stocks: What’s Better? Growth or Consistency?

Are you trying to invest in dividend stocks? What’s better, growth or consistency? Here’s my take.

Read more »