Canadian DIY investors with an extra $50,000 or so in new money to put to work have plenty of options. And while the TSX Index is coming into 2026 hot, I wouldn’t hit the panic button over the next stock market correction. Undoubtedly, one should always be prepared in any given year, and the key isn’t timing when it’ll start, but having a game plan for how to react once stocks inevitably do start putting together nasty losing streaks.
When it comes to a considerable sum (let’s say in the five figures), I’m an advocate of dollar-cost avereraging (or incremental buying through the course of a year), rather than putting everything to work at one instance in time, especially if the broad equity markets are close to a new all-time high and we’re fresh off one of the best return years in recent memory. Of course, dollar-cost averaging isn’t a magic formula for good returns. In fact, if stocks continue to roar higher with this kind of momentum, putting a lump sum into stocks at once might outpace an incremental buying approach.
Indeed, there are trade-offs to consider. For investors who don’t have liquidity beyond the amount they’re looking to invest, though, I’d view the dollar-cost averaging approach as a way to calm one’s nerves if the perception of a correction is high or if one doesn’t have liquidity to be a net buyer on such a dip. Of course, it all comes down to one’s comfort level.
Source: Getty Images
Incremental buying could make more sense when dealing with large sums
For a relatively new investor, the pros (less panic) of incremental buying, I think, outweigh the potential negatives. That said, if 2025 wasn’t a red-hot year for the TSX Index and we’re in the midst of a bear market, perhaps the lump-sum approach would have proven better. In any case, investors keen on formulating a passive income stream may wish to steadily add to their holdings over time.
If you’re looking to average a 4% yield, a $50,000 portfolio would payout $2,000 before taxes. Of course, if you’re in a TFSA, that’d be tax-free income. Either way, backing up the truck on a 4%-yielder at one instance may be the best way to lock in that yield. However, incremental buyers willing to average up their yield may wish to build such a passive income stream over time.
As you may know, the yield goes higher when share prices move lower, so when it comes to an income stream, a dollar-cost averaging approach could prove wise, especially if the market is expensive and some froth needs to come off the top of some of the names (most notably the big Canadian banks, which have endured yield compression in the past year as a result of big capital gains in 2025).
What about Telus’ huge yield?
For investors seeking higher yields, a name like Telus (TSX: T) could be a worthy option, given its yield is around 9.3%. And with a dividend growth pause and plenty of efforts to improve the cash flows, I do find the battered telecom to be intriguing for those risk-takers who prioritize income over growth, even if it means tackling serious volatility.
Either way, Telus shares have been gaining in recent sessions, and if the dividend does survive, nibbling on the stock while the yield’s still above 9% could make sense. Given the annual income from $50,000, the stock could work out to more than $4,500 in annual income.
That’s a great deal, but investors should be cautious about putting too much to work at any given time, as there are dividend cut risks and capital downside to be concerned about. Either way, for stability, I’d be an incremental buyer of Telus’ diversified dividend (in small doses) with yields in the 3–4% range.
