Why Crescent Point Energy’s High Yield Isn’t Worth the Risks

Crescent Point Energy (TSX:CPG)(NYSE:CPG) currently has one of the highest yields on the TSX, but this yield brings with it numerous risks.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Crescent Point Energy (TSX:CPG)(NYSE:CPG) has been pursuing a strategy based around attracting investors with its 9.52% yield. This strategy has come under criticism, since it has resulted in Crescent Point needing to use most of its cash flow to fund its huge dividend, resulting in the company needing to issue large amounts of equity to pay for its string of acquisitions.

The question investors may be asking is: what are the consequences of this dividend focused strategy? I think there are two main concerns, and with a share price that has shown minimal growth over the past three years, the following risks simply aren’t worth the high yield.

Low oil prices are putting dividend growth and sustainability at risk

Crescent Point is paying a dividend beyond its means. If the recent 10% decline in WTI prices since the start of November alone persists, it will almost definitely prevent a future increase, and possibly result in either a cut to the dividend, or a reduction in capital expenditures, both of which are bad for investors. Since Crescent Point is focused on its yield to attract investors (especially U.S. investors), a cut would be very detrimental to share price.

Why is Crescent Point paying a dividend beyond its means? Currently its payout ratio based on its earnings is around 540%. Based on cash flow from operations though, it is a much more reasonable 48%.

The problem? When capital expenditures are subtracted from cash flow from operations, Crescent Point is only left with $451 million of free cash flow for the past four quarters, which is not nearly enough to fund the $1.1 billion in dividends it paid out for the previous four quarters.

To cover the gap, Crescent Point has been paying for about 40% of those dividends with stock, which only adds to the dilution concerns shareholders already have.

Crescent Point has seen its net debt grow approximately 47% since 2012, and with WTI currently sitting at US $82.68, far below the US$100 forecasted by Crescent Point in its 2013 Annual Information Form, Crescent Point is putting shareholders at risk, especially in these oil price conditions, by paying such a high dividend. This is not a position shareholders want to be in.

The focus on yield leaves little cash flow, and risks shareholder dilution

Since Crescent Point is spending so much of its cash flow on paying its yield, it has to rely on equity to pay for its expensive acquisitions. The result? Crescent Points share count has increased 140% since 2009. This affects EPS. For example, between 2012 and 2013, Crescent Point observed a 24% drop in net income, but a 35% drop in EPS. This is because shares outstanding increased 16% during the same period.

With all the equity issues, if cash flow from the acquired assets does not reflect the  new amount of issued shares, EPS will drop, and put downward pressure on share prices.

This is again not a position shareholders want to be in, as it is always preferable that a company pays for its acquisitions and production growth using cash flow, which creates value for current shareholders and is immediately accretive.

To make matters worse for Crescent Point, its high yield has been ineffective in attracting the U.S. investors it desperately needs to move its share price, with U.S. investment actually dropping 24% from 43% two years ago.

Crescent Point Energy may offer a fantastic yield, but with share price growth severely lagging the Standard & Poor’s/TSX Energy Index, it has not been worth it. And with low oil prices, and a dividend that is already stretched, it continues not to be.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Adam Mancini has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

oil and gas pipeline
Energy Stocks

Where Will Enbridge Stock Be in 3 Years?

Despite its recent sharp gains, Enbridge (TSX:ENB) stock has the potential to continue inching up in the years to come…

Read more »

Nuclear power station cooling tower
Energy Stocks

Is Cameco Stock the Best Renewable Energy Stock for You?

While it's true that Cameco stock (TSX:CCO) looks like a strong clean energy solution, it's not actually even a renewable…

Read more »

Target. Stand out from the crowd
Energy Stocks

Here’s Why I Think Brookfield Renewable Stock Is 1 of the Best Deals on the TSX Today

Brookfield Renewable (TSX:BEP.UN) stock saw shares rise by about 35% since earnings, but even more is on the way.

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

How Baytex Energy Lost 12% Last Month

Baytex Energy (TSX:BTE) stock fell 12% last month.

Read more »

bulb idea thinking
Energy Stocks

This Stock Is Miles Ahead of Its Industry: Is It a Buy Now?

This stock has proven to be well worth the investment, especially at a time with increasing demand for clean energy…

Read more »

Oil pumps against sunset
Energy Stocks

Is Suncor Energy Stock a Buy in 2024? 

Let's dive into whether Suncor Energy (TSX:SU) is a stock that's worth buying in this current environment or if investors…

Read more »

oil tank at night
Energy Stocks

Is CNQ a Buy Before its Upcoming Stock Split?

CNQ stock is a high-dividend TSX energy giant with a growing dividend yield. Is CNQ stock a good buy right…

Read more »

Solar panels and windmills
Energy Stocks

How Brookfield Renewable Stock Gained 40% in a Month

Brookfield Renewable stock (TSX:BEP.UN) surged in share price from a landmark deal and strong earnings, leading to a 40% jump.

Read more »