New Investors: Why You Shouldn’t Care How Much a Stock Costs

While stocks like Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG) may have high price tags, that really shouldn’t matter to investors.

I’m a bit dumbfounded sometimes when I see articles that talk about good stocks that are under $10 or $5, or when my friends say that a stock is too expensive, referring only to its absolute price. Instead, you’d be better of looking at a stock’s price relative to its earnings.

I can understand why price might be an issue if you’re trying to buy Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its nearly $300,000 price tag. After all, to own even one share of that company is out of reach for most investors.

However, when it comes to most of the stocks out there, it really shouldn’t even be a consideration.

Number of shares just doesn’t matter

Whether I buy 50 shares of Snap Inc. (NYSE:SNAP) or just one share of Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG), my total investment will be roughly about the same, and in the end, that’s all that really matters. A 5% increase is still a 5% increase in your portfolio’s value, regardless of what the stock price is.

All that the stock price tells you is the number of shares you’ll be able to buy for the amount you plan to invest, but it really has no significance. You won’t earn any more in dividends, and you won’t turn more of a profit simply by having more shares.

I’m sure most investors would rather have one share of Alphabet rather than 500 of Snap, if for no other reason than that Alphabet is a much better stock that actually makes money and has a lot of upside to it. Factoring in the number of shares you own is pointless, and I find it baffling that people would even consider it.

Investing low dollars isn’t worthwhile

I suppose one argument could be made that investors can’t afford to invest in Alphabet because its stock is over $1,000. However, I’d suggest that if you’re investing less than $2,000 at a time, it’s likely not worth the effort. On most exchanges, you’ll be charged a total commission of ~$20 to buy and to sell, so on a $1,000 investment, you’ll need to earn 2% just to break even. The lower your investment, the higher your breakeven price will be.

In some scenarios, you may be able to avoid fees with certain brokerages, but with a low-dollar investment, the amount of profit you could earn might make you wonder if it’s worth the effort. Consider a scenario where you do research, find a good stock, and buy $1,000 worth of shares. If the stock has a great return and increases 10%, you’ve only made $100 on all that effort, and that’s under a very good scenario. The old adage of needing money to make money still rings true.

Penny stocks aren’t worth the risk

One way investors will try to maximize their returns and justify making small investments is by buying penny stocks, since the upside could be tremendous. Even a one-cent change in price can be significant and produce large returns for your portfolio. However, a lot of these investments are built off hype and speculation, and the swings that happen with penny stocks can easily eclipse what we’ve seen happen to Aphria Inc. (TSX:APH) and other pot stocks recently.

Everyone hopes and believes that their penny stock is going to be the next Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and will strike it rich when the share price takes off. Unfortunately, in most cases, it won’t follow Amazon’s path, and investors will be lucky if it just doesn’t end up being another Southridge Enterprises Inc.

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), and Amazon. Tom Gardner owns shares of Alphabet (A shares) and Alphabet (C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, and Berkshire Hathaway (B shares).

More on Stocks for Beginners

top TSX stocks to buy
Stocks for Beginners

Top Canadian Stocks to Buy With $5,000 in 2026

If you are looking to invest $5,000 in 2026, these top Canadian stocks stand out for their solid momentum, financial…

Read more »

money goes up and down in balance
Tech Stocks

1 Magnificent Canadian Stock Down 26% to Buy and Hold Forever

Lightspeed isn’t the pandemic high-flyer anymore and that reset may be exactly what gives patient investors a better-risk, better-price entry…

Read more »

man touches brain to show a good idea
Stocks for Beginners

The No-Brainer Canadian Stocks I’d Buy With $5,000 Right Now

Explore promising Canadian stocks to buy now. Invest $5,000 wisely for new opportunities and growth in 2027.

Read more »

stocks climbing green bull market
Stocks for Beginners

3 TSX Stocks That Could Triple in 5 Years 

Learn about the critical factors affecting stocks in the second half of the 2020s, including government strategies and market shifts.

Read more »

a person watches stock market trades
Dividend Stocks

Analysts Are Bullish on These Canadian Stocks: Here’s My Take

Canada’s “boring” stocks are getting interesting again, and these three steady businesses could benefit if rates ease and patience returns.

Read more »

Lights glow in a cityscape at night.
Stocks for Beginners

Is Royal Bank of Canada a Buy for Its 2.9% Dividend Yield?

Royal Bank is the “default” dividend pick, but National Bank may offer more income and upside if you’re willing to…

Read more »

A woman shops in a grocery store while pushing a stroller with a child
Dividend Stocks

5.8% Dividend Yield: I’m Loading Up on This Monthly Passive Income Stock

This grocery-anchored REIT won’t wow you with excitement, but its steady tenants and monthly payout could make it a practical…

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing Canada's Tax Free Savings Account
Stocks for Beginners

Canadian Investors: The Best $14,000 TFSA Approach

Here's how every Canadian investor should use their TFSA to maximize its long-term growth potential without taking unnecessary risks.

Read more »