Is the 4% Retirement Rule Dead?

The retirement rule might be higher than 4% today, but the rate shouldn’t matter for as long as the rule helps you maintain financial discipline. If you need a safety net, only the Fortis stock has bond-like features to reduce market risks.

| More on:
Happy Retirement” on a road

Image source: Getty Images

Retirement studies, as well as financial gurus, peg the withdrawal rate at 4%. It’s the long-standing gold standard for retirees who fear outliving their retirement savings. In Canada, most retirees are still sticking to the 4% retirement rule, although it appears dead in other countries.

The norm might not be useful anymore, and Canadian retirees are facing a big challenge. Usually, a retirement portfolio consists of stocks for money growth and bonds for risk reduction. However, the record low bond yields destroy the formula. Retirees would need more savings and seek higher returns to fund retirement needs.

Deepening concern

Pensions from the retirement system will not provide an adequate financial cushion to retirees. Thus, Canadian seniors might need to be aggressive and make 7% as the withdrawal rate. The super-low interest rate environment is affecting long-term bond yields. As a result, it becomes exceeding challenging for retirement planners.

A new report published by CIBC World Markets estimates the market-weighted Canadian bonds (two, five, 10, and 30 years) to produce a compound annual return of only 0.6% over the next decade. If the inflation rate is 2%, the real return for 10 years is negative.

Not a cyclical bump in the road

The reality of low yields will hurt income investors, particularly retirees. It would mean taking on high-risk investments to meet financial objectives over the long-run. For risk-averse investors, it implies saving more money to compensate for lower or weaker returns.

If you were to save cash and not invest, it would compound at a slower pace. Long-term savers require more assets to achieve a reasonable retirement income. The scenario is problematic if you push the numbers. Assuming the long-term bond yield is 1%, you would need $2.2 million in savings to realize $100,000 annual spending for 25 years.

Most defensive, but a profitable asset

High-risk assets won’t cut it for retirees. You have a greater risk of seeing the value of investment dissipate sharply when the market turns. The logical move is to play defensive, earn adequately, and mitigate the risk. Fortis (TSX:FTS)(NYSE:FTS) is the hands-down choice if you’re seeking a safety net.

The business of this $24.24 billion electric and gas utility company is pandemic-proof and recession-resistant. It could replace bonds because it boasts of the same characteristics, but deliver higher returns. With its 3.65% dividend, you would need only $1,020,500 to grow the money to $2.5 million in 25 years. You achieve your target of $100,000 annual spending.

Bonds don’t have much upside potential these days, while Fortis promises to raise dividends by 6.5% annually through 2024. The business model is low-risk as 99% of revenues are regulated. Management will spend $18.3 billion on its regulated assets from now until 2024. Its growing renewable energy assets are the next growth drivers.

A rule is better than none

The 4% retirement rule can work for others and fall short for some. However, it will help to practice withdrawing $4,000 for every $100,000 you hold in your portfolio. At least you have a guide to enable you to estimate the amount of investment you would need as you go along. You have a decent chance at success with a rule rather than not embracing one.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Christopher Liew has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends FORTIS INC.

More on Dividend Stocks

Businessman holding tablet and showing a growing virtual hologram of statistics, graph and chart with arrow up on dark background. Stock market. Business growth, planning and strategy concept
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Magic: Earn Enormous Passive Income That the CRA Can’t Touch

If you're seeking out passive income, with zero taxes involved, then get on board with a TFSA and this portfolio…

Read more »

Man with no money. Businessman holding empty wallet
Dividend Stocks

2 Stocks Under $50 New Investors Can Confidently Buy

There are some great stocks under $50 that every investor needs to know about. Here’s a look at two great…

Read more »

think thought consider
Dividend Stocks

Down 10.88%: Is ATD Stock a Good Buy After Earnings?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX:ATD) stock might not be the easy buy-case it once was. Here’s a look at what happened.

Read more »

money cash dividends
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Dividend Stocks: Earn $1,200/Year Tax-Free

Canadian stocks like Fortis are a must-have in your portfolio to earn tax-free yields for decades.

Read more »

sale discount best price
Dividend Stocks

1 Dividend Stock Down 11 Percent to Buy Right Now

Do you want a great dividend stock down 11% that can provide years of growth potential? Here's one heavily discounted…

Read more »

Growth from coins
Dividend Stocks

1 Grade A Dividend Stock Down 11% to Buy and Hold Forever 

If you're looking for the right dividend stock at the right price, you're going to want to consider this insurance…

Read more »

Target. Stand out from the crowd
Dividend Stocks

2 Dividend Stocks to Double Up on Right Now

Are you looking for dividend stocks to buy right now? Here are two top picks!

Read more »

edit Taxes CRA
Dividend Stocks

Tax Time: How to Keep More of Your Money

Nearly everyone hates paying taxes, although Canadians can lessen the financial pain with the right tax strategies.

Read more »