Better REIT: RioCan vs Choice Properties?

If you’re looking for income, the two largest REITs out there are a good place to start. But which edges out the other?

| More on:

RioCan REIT (TSX:REI.UN) and Choice Properties REIT (TSX:CHP.UN) are two of the most prominent real estate investment trusts (REIT) on the TSX, making them popular choices for Canadian investors looking to build long-term passive income. Both offer solid dividend yields, diverse property portfolios, and strong management. But which one stands out as the better buy today? Let’s take a closer look at their recent earnings, financial health, and future outlook.

a person looks out a window into a cityscape

Image source: Getty Images

The basics

RioCan recently announced its fourth-quarter and year-end results for 2024, showing an uptick in earnings and an impressive 4.3% increase in its monthly distribution. This bumped its payout from $0.0925 to $0.0965 per unit, translating to an annual yield of 5.92% at writing. This move reflects the REIT’s confidence in its ongoing operations and its commitment to rewarding unitholders. Choice Properties, meanwhile, declared a monthly distribution of $0.063333 per unit, or $0.76 annually, providing a slightly lower forward yield of 5.57%.

In terms of performance, RioCan’s stock is currently trading at $19.77 at writing, giving it a market capitalization of $5.81 billion. Its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio sits at 12.38, while its price-to-book ratio is an attractive 0.77, suggesting the stock might be undervalued. Choice Properties trades at $13.73, with a larger market cap of $9.87 billion. However, its trailing P/E ratio is slightly higher at 12.58, and its price-to-book ratio stands at 2.01, reflecting a higher premium for its assets.

The books

Financially, both REITs are on solid ground, but their debt levels tell different stories. RioCan holds $7.35 billion in total debt, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 97.27%. While that’s significant, it’s relatively manageable given the REIT’s strong cash flow. Choice Properties, on the other hand, carries $11.97 billion in debt, pushing its debt-to-equity ratio to a much higher 244.33%. This elevated leverage reflects the scale of Choice’s portfolio but could become a concern if interest rates remain high.

Looking ahead, RioCan is aiming for funds from operations (FFO) per unit of $1.89 to $1.92 in 2025, supported by expected same-property net operating income (NOI) growth of 3.5%. The REIT also expects to book $70 million to $80 million in gains from condo sales, particularly from its UC Towers 2 and 3 projects. This forward-looking guidance suggests strong earnings momentum and potential further dividend increases. Choice Properties remains focused on high-quality retail and residential developments. Particularly properties anchored by Loblaw, its largest tenant. While its strategy is conservative, it ensures consistent rental income and long-term stability.

Bottom line

In terms of profitability, Choice Properties holds an edge with a profit margin of 53.36% compared to RioCan’s 35.38%. However, RioCan’s operating margin of 52.17% is close to Choice’s 69.48%, showing both REITs run efficient operations. When it comes to dividends, RioCan’s recent hike gives it an advantage, offering a higher yield while maintaining a healthy payout ratio of 70.09%. Choice Properties’s payout ratio is nearly identical at 69.96%, indicating both REITs are balancing returns with sustainability.

Ultimately, the decision comes down to what type of investor you are. If you prefer a higher yield with more growth potential, RioCan seems like the better bet. Its lower valuation, rising distributions, and ambitious development plans make it appealing to those seeking both income and capital appreciation. However, if stability and conservative growth are your priorities, Choice Properties’s strong tenant base and consistent payouts might make it the safer choice.

Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

More on Dividend Stocks

Canadian Red maple leaves seamless wallpaper pattern
Dividend Stocks

The Canadian Stocks I’d Be Most Comfortable Buying and Holding in a TFSA Forever

I'd be most comfortable buying and holding blue-chip Canadian dividend stocks in a TFSA forever.

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

This Is the Average TFSA Balance for Canadians at Age 60

Turning 60 puts your TFSA in the spotlight, and this senior-housing dividend payer aims to deliver tax-free income plus long-term…

Read more »

Middle aged man drinks coffee
Dividend Stocks

1 Magnificent TSX Dividend Stock Down 12% to Buy and Hold for Decades

This TSX dividend stock is down 12%, giving long‑term investors a chance to lock in reliable income and steady growth…

Read more »

woman considering the future
Retirement

How Much Canadians Typically Have in a TFSA by Age 50

Here is the average TFSA balance if you are 50-years old. Use tax-free compounding to build substantive wealth for retirement.

Read more »

dividend growth for passive income
Dividend Stocks

The Best TSX Stocks Right Now for Income and Growth Combined

Buy Enbridge (TSX:ENB) and another stock for income and appreciation this year.

Read more »

heavy construction machines needed for infrastructure buildout
Dividend Stocks

These Stocks Will Power Canada’s Nation-Building Push in 2026

Canada's $1T nation-building boom targets infrastructure, housing, AI power, and resilience. These 2 surging TSX stocks are set to cash…

Read more »

crisis concept, falling stairs
Dividend Stocks

1 Practically Perfect Canadian Stock Down 19% to Buy and Hold Forever

Brookfield is down about 23% from its high, but its global real-asset machine still looks built to grow for decades.

Read more »

Couple working on laptops at home and fist bumping
Dividend Stocks

A Year Later: The Dividend Stock That Still Pays Like Clockwork

This monthly dividend stock keeps paying investors through tough consumer cycles by collecting royalties instead of running restaurants.

Read more »