Which Is the Better Opportunity: Penn West Petroleum Ltd. or Husky Energy Inc.?

Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (TSX:PWT)(NYSE:PWE) and Husky Energy Inc. (TSX:HSE) are two very different ways to play crude’s recovery. Which should you choose?

The Motley Fool

Value investors have been waiting on the edge of their seats for months now, looking for the flashing neon sign telling them the bottom has arrived in the crude market.

As we all know, the world of investing doesn’t quite work that way. In fact, the bottom might even be past us. Rig counts are down, the price of crude has stabilized, and the shouts of upcoming debt defaults have been silenced—at least for now. This could very well be the beginning of the next bull market in oil.

But nobody can say that with any certainty, which is why I employ a simple strategy when it comes to the sector and my portfolio. If I can find cheap assets accompanied with a reasonable balance sheet, I’m going to buy in for the long term. I don’t know where crude will be next week or next year, but I’m pretty confident it’ll be up a whole lot at some point in the future.

Both Husky Energy Inc. (TSX:HSE) and Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (TSX:PWT)(NYSE:PWE) meet my qualifications. Is there one I should prefer over the other? Let’s have a closer look.

Outlook

Thanks to a recent $321 million asset sale, the short-term outlook for Penn West looks a lot better than it did a few months ago.

Although Penn West’s new management team has done a nice job turning the ship around after years of mismanagement, Penn West still isn’t in the greatest of spots. The balance sheet still has almost $2 billion worth of debt, and additional asset sales will be needed if oil continues to languish between $50 and $55 per barrel. At least the weakness in the Canadian dollar is helping.

Husky, meanwhile, is a much more stable producer. It has large oil sands projects that are less sensitive to the price of crude, since most of the costs are borne up front. It also has downstream operations that include a handful of refineries and more than 500 fuel stations located mainly in the west, which act as a hedge against crude.

Although the two companies are in the same sector, they experience different challenges. Husky is a safer investment than Penn West, but the latter will likely see much more upside when the sector recovers.

Dividends

As part of the agreement it signed with lenders back in March, Penn West will only be paying a quarterly dividend of a penny per share. That’s a yield of a little over 1%.

Husky’s dividend is much more attractive. Shares currently yield 4.3%, a dividend that looks to be pretty safe. The company is sitting on a stockpile of cash, and has the balance sheet strength to borrow more if needed. Obviously, borrowing to sustain the dividend isn’t a smart long-term choice, but for a few quarters it should be fine—providing the price of crude goes higher.

Price per flowing barrel

An important metric of value in the energy patch is the price per flowing barrel. Essentially, it’s a measurement of how much investors are paying per barrel of production.

Penn West’s number is one of the best in the sector. Investors are paying just $33,600 per flowing barrel based on 2014 production, compared with Husky, where they are paying $92,970. It’s clear Penn West is the better value, even if production is scheduled to fall off a little in 2015.

Which is best?

To determine which one of these companies to buy, you have to figure out how much risk you’re willing to take.

Husky is the safe choice. It has a great balance sheet, a billionaire backer who owns the majority of shares, and downstream operations to shield it from volatility in crude. Plus, you’ll get a pretty nice dividend to wait.

But it’s obvious Penn West has more upside. If the company can sort out its problems, sell some more assets, and get cooperation from the price of crude, there could be serious gains. Yes, it’s riskier, but at least for my portfolio, it’s a risk I’m comfortable taking.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Nelson Smith owns shares of PENN WEST PETROLEUM LTD..

More on Energy Stocks

oil and gas pipeline
Energy Stocks

Is TC Energy Stock a Good Buy?

TC Energy stock has a lot going for it, but there are also a few red flags to consider before…

Read more »

Canadian energy stocks are rising with oil prices
Energy Stocks

Is Canadian Natural Resources Stock a Good Buy?

CNRL is an energy giant with a market capitalization near $100 billion.

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Is Baytex Energy Stock a Good Buy?

Baytex Energy is a TSX stock that has massively underperformed the broader markets in the past decade, but it trades…

Read more »

Pumpjack in Alberta Canada
Energy Stocks

Is Suncor a Buy for its 4.2% Dividend?

Suncor Energy (TSX:SU) has a 4.2% yield. Is it a buy?

Read more »

engineer at wind farm
Energy Stocks

Energy Stocks to Buy Now: Top Picks for Canadian Investors

These companies have a solid business model and growing cash flows to support higher dividend payments and share prices.

Read more »

Trans Alaska Pipeline with Autumn Colors
Energy Stocks

Is Enbridge Stock a Good Buy?

Enbridge provides a 6.5% dividend yield right now.

Read more »

Oil industry worker works in oilfield
Energy Stocks

Is Suncor Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Suncor stock looks undervalued as the company continues to increases cash flows, earnings, and shareholder returns.

Read more »

construction workers talk on the job site
Energy Stocks

Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Baytex vs Suncor?

Suncor and Baytex stocks both look like solid companies offering growth and dividends. But which is the better buy?

Read more »