Better Buy: Renewable Energy or Uranium Stocks?

The world is shifting towards clean energy sources, creating investment opportunities in the renewables sector. What’s a better bet: environmental or uranium stocks?

Renewable energy is the future. There’s simply no way around it. But which type of renewable energy? After all, if we look at where investors have placed their bets in the past, one or another type of energy source always came out on top.

First it was coal, then oil and gas. Now that we’ve finally come around to moving towards a new type of energy production, namely renewable energy, which type will come out on top? Today, I’m going to look at whether it could be uranium or environmental power.

Uranium stocks

Uranium stocks are a solid choice for investors seeking growth in the next decade. Nuclear power creates clean energy that we can continue to use for years to come. These stocks are already being pushed higher as the world attempts to shift away from oil and gas production. This is evident in the United States where about 20% of power now comes from nuclear plants.

These stocks will continue to climb as the rest of the world comes on board. India, China, Russia among other countries have already signed on to develop more nuclear power plants. Currently, 445 nuclear reactors are operational globally, and 52 are under construction. Moreover, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has prompted Europe to consider accelerating investment in nuclear, wind, and solar to reduce dependence on Russian natural gas. These factors combined with supply uncertainty have boosted uranium prices in 2022.

The question is, for how long? Demand is rising for nuclear power, and we simply don’t have the stored uranium to support it. Companies like Cameco (TSX: CCO)(NYSE: CCJ) will do well in the near-term with the surging price of uranium, sure. But uranium stocks could then be set up for an eventual crash when we run out of uranium or realize it’s not something we can continuously mine for.

So, while uranium stocks should be a great purchase in the next decade, it’s more of a transitionary power source. Long-term investors may want to look elsewhere.

Environmental sources

Renewable energy is eco-friendly; unlike fossil fuels and other types of energy sources, retrieving renewable energy doesn’t damage our environment. And that’s what you get with environmental sources. These power sources come from air, water, and solar, which will always exist. That’s what makes them the perfect power source.

The problem here is that we have a long way to go before we can store this energy in large amounts. So, while it looks like we will eventually move towards these renewable energy sources, over the next decade there will be a lot of problem-solving to do.

When that problem is eventually solved, there’s bound to be a huge shift towards renewable energy. And there are certainly ways to get in on the action today for the patient investor.

One way would be to invest in a company like Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (TSX: BEP.UN)(NYSE: BEP), which invests in all of these power sources. The company continues to sign on more European countries and demonstrates significant promise in the decades to come. Plus, you can lock in a juicy 4.03% dividend yield!

I would also recommend Lithium Americas (TSX: LAC)(NYSE: LAC) if you want in on lithium battery power which is the go-to energy storage source that is already in high demand for electric vehicles. The company recently announced that early-works construction is on track for its large-scale Thacker Pass project that will have a life of mine of over 40 years. This project is forecast to achieve average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) of $520 million. There are strong tailwinds at the back of the electric vehicle industry that are leading growth investors to consider stocks like Lithium Americas.

Bottom line

While uranium stocks should continue performing well over the next decade, there will eventually be a time when we move away from nuclear energy. So, I would instead choose the safety and security of renewable energy from environmental sources and seek stocks that are set up for growth in this sector.

Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has positions in Brookfield Renewable Partners. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

More on Energy Stocks

runner checks her biodata on smartwatch
Energy Stocks

1 Canadian Stock Down 14% to Buy for Lifelong Passive Income

This stock now offers a dividend yield above 5.5%.

Read more »

how to save money
Energy Stocks

This Dividend Stock Pays Monthly and Yields 6%: Here’s What $7,000 Could Pay You

Freehold Royalties pairs a 6%-plus monthly dividend with an asset-light royalty model that can keep cash flowing without drilling wells.

Read more »

Dam of hydroelectric power plant in Canadian Rockies
Energy Stocks

Here Are the Canadian Stocks I’d Feel Safest Holding Forever

Given their regulated asset base, low-risk operations, consistent dividend growth, and visible growth prospects, these two defensive stocks are ideal…

Read more »

Aerial view of a wind farm
Energy Stocks

Cautious Investors: 2 Safer High-Yield Dividend Stocks for Canadians

Canadians should add Enbridge and Brookfield Renewable Partners on their watchlist for potential buy-the-dip opportunities on market corrections.

Read more »

golden sunset in crude oil refinery with pipeline system
Energy Stocks

Enbridge Stock: Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold It Right Now?

Enbridge just reaffirmed 2026 guidance and grew its project backlog to $50 billion. Here's what it means for the TSX…

Read more »

boy in bowtie and glasses gives positive thumbs up
Energy Stocks

Down 12% From Its All-Time High: Is This 5.5% Dividend Stock Now a Buy?

This TSX giant might be getting oversold.

Read more »

a man relaxes with his feet on a pile of books
Energy Stocks

2 TFSA Investing Tactics Used by Wealthy Canadians

These strategies can help build retirement wealth while reducing potential taxes.

Read more »

A glass jar resting on its side with Canadian banknotes and change inside.
Energy Stocks

Waiting Until 45 Instead of 35 to Invest $500 a Month Could Cost You $450,000 by 65

Starting with $500 a month at 35 instead of 45 could mean hundreds of thousands more at 65, even with…

Read more »